Cox vs Hille vs H-Mac

Started by Robert Harvey 35, May 05, 2010, 08:07:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cox vs Hille vs H-Mac

Cox
17 (53.1%)
Hille
7 (21.9%)
H-Mac
8 (25%)

Total Members Voted: 4

Robert Harvey 35

which ruckman will be the best for the rest of the season? worried that cox may get injured or be rested due to wce not likley for finals and the emergence of naitanui.

MissPiesFF

Cos is your best bet in regards to those three. Even when WCE are on the bottom COX manages to score big time. Look at last year. WCE was sh*t and he pulled up over 100+ per round. You just can not go past premiums no matter who they play for win or lose.

BGK

I think Cox is certainly back in form, but with another dominant ruckman around in Nic Nat I dont think he will consistently get you those big scores like he used to.

Hille is still too risky IMO. Could get suspended or go down injured any time.

H Mac looks the best value to me. He is a bit cheaper and will still get you good scores pretty much every week.

Master Q


Boomz

Cox is the one to go for out of those 3...

yorgis

cox or sandi is the way to go, but if u want cash why not think about jamar[his ave is 86 which is better than ryder,leuenberger,nicnat,clarke and jolly] he's only295k

yorgis

sorry mis typed should be 76

elephants

i have hille and i always thought hille to cox but with coxxys groins i will keep hille for the season as he can really step it up IMO

CFC 1979


bundyboy

if cash is no problem, then cox.

if you want to save $40k, then hmac, as he is still likely to score consistently well.

i worry about hille....

Flame

Normally I'd say Big Cox but you can't go past Hmac for consistency...He is safer but big cox could deliver more???? I have the same dilemma??

numberwang

Dont know why people stress about Hille, he had the one jnjury and before that he was a gun. Looks like he's back his best and I won't be trading him out. HMAC looks a good option...

I do worry about cox's longevity...excuse the pun.

elxam


valkorum

Quote from: bestguykai on May 05, 2010, 08:12:01 AM
I think Cox is certainly back in form, but with another dominant ruckman around in Nic Nat I dont think he will consistently get you those big scores like he used to.

I dont consider NicNat to be a dominant ruckman.  He is a burst player who can break open a game in patches (which he didnt do against Freo :P)

I think Cox is the choice here.  Consistant and gets a lot of ball around the ground.

elxam