Seaby

[steje008]

Just checked my dream team and saw Seaby is on 1....can someone tell me what happened and if his serously injured?

[BGK]

Rolled an ankle, didnt come back. It didnt look to serious.

[Flame]

YES..I'd like to thank Seaby for my 1 point tonight!!!! >:(

[BratPack]

Ditto. After I had him the first two weeks he's gone shower. I almost hope it IS serious so I have an excuse to trade his ass. The Pack are ANGRY!  >:(

[Flame]

I with you on that!!!Although he's dropped so much in price it almost isn't worth it!! Shower!!

[Jugganauts]

He rolled his ankle in the first quarter had some ice on it for a bit then they went to re strap it must have done it too tight and he had ice on it for the rest of the game

THANK YOU MARK SEABY 1 POINT IS BETTER THEN A DONUT

[HellYeah]

Zero is better.  As I understand it zero is treated as +"did not play" ie no price movement

[Jugganauts]

Zero is better.  As I understand it zero is treated as +"did not play" ie no price movement

No if they are selected in the final team that runs out on the field and they get a zero the scores from ur bench players do not count

[AndyJ]

ooooo I went Seaby -> Cox this week......... hopefully he can do better than 1.

[wipz]

I wish I had done that trade insted of gray -> didak  :'(

[numberwang]

shower...he'll drop $23,000...more cash to trade him now.
damn i hate this...the should be an under 10points rule if injured that selects your emergency instead. could screw me this week.

[Boomz]

Glad i dont have him almost went for him but went hille instead which has turned out to be a lot better!

[HellYeah]

Zero is better.  As I understand it zero is treated as +"did not play" ie no price movement

No if they are selected in the final team that runs out on the field and they get a zero the scores from ur bench players do not count

I can't recall how it works with bench players, but last year a zero certainly resulted in no price movement.  I don't know whether that anomoly has been corrected for 2010 or not.

[Boomz]

Zero is better.  As I understand it zero is treated as +"did not play" ie no price movement

No if they are selected in the final team that runs out on the field and they get a zero the scores from ur bench players do not count

I can't recall how it works with bench players, but last year a zero certainly resulted in no price movement.  I don't know whether that anomoly has been corrected for 2010 or not.

Im pretty sure i read somewhere that this had changed and his price will still go down.

[valkorum]

YES..I'd like to thank Seaby for my 1 point tonight!!!! >:(

My DT just gets better and better