Are the breakevens correct?

ossie85 · April 24, 2010, 04:51:15 AM

Hey m0nty,

Just noticing that BEs have a round lag. I.e. round 3 score, should be round 4 score, etc. Can be a bit confusing!

Justin Bieber · April 24, 2010, 06:41:04 AM

Noticed it a few rounds ago but it was pretty obvious which scores are for which round if you follow along.

Thought i saw alot of guys falling in price last round when i looked at the breakevens calculated. Am i seeing things or were those prices correct? ???

m0nty · April 24, 2010, 08:30:21 AM

Are you talking about the Breakevens page? They all say R4 as far as I can see.

I've been having a few issues with caching on the site this week, maybe do a shift-reload.

Justin Bieber · April 24, 2010, 09:10:32 AM

All fixed now with the breakeven previews.

Cheers

ossie85 · April 27, 2010, 05:05:04 AM

Take this page for example....

http://www.fanfooty.com.au/game/newprices.php?id=3434

Ryan O'Keefe says Round 4 score of 111, and Round 5 BE of 116

He scored the 111 in round 5 not round 4....

No one else get this?

Justin Bieber · April 27, 2010, 05:54:25 AM

The previews are correct but the new B/E during the weekend seem to be what Ossie says.

Says round 4 score on these pages for the other matches for me to.

Alex7089 · April 27, 2010, 05:58:45 AM

Yeah the after game 'new prices & BE's' seem to be a week behind.

m0nty · April 27, 2010, 07:20:58 AM

Ah yes, just a mislabelled column.

HintT · April 27, 2010, 11:37:47 AM

So shouldn't it be relabelled so we know what it means? :D

m0nty · April 27, 2010, 11:57:15 AM

Yes, I have done that.

Griffo1982 · April 28, 2010, 02:06:37 AM

Have noticed a few differing Breakevens on the forum between Montys & tooserious.net mainly Chris Judds which is listed as -296 on fanfooty & has been quoted as being 70 on tooserious (cant confirm this because tooserious is blocked at work).

Was wondering if anyone can confirm if there is either a problem with the breakevens on fanfooty or tooserious.net.

BratPack · April 28, 2010, 02:11:53 AM

Judd is listed as 70 for me, maybe you need to empty your cache

Resch · April 28, 2010, 03:04:06 AM

Quote from: BratPack on April 28, 2010, 02:11:53 AM
Judd is listed as 70 for me, maybe you need to empty your cache

Yep, shows 70 for me too.

tigertops · April 28, 2010, 03:42:10 AM

where are the breakevens on this site?
or is it just under the teams games on the front page.

brent007 · April 28, 2010, 04:24:50 AM

None of the BEs work for me either. Everyone is in the -200s

Are the breakevens correct?

ossie85

ossie85

Alex7089