Main Menu

From the Pavilion

Started by reesbr, April 09, 2010, 02:27:11 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Nails

Greater fielding at times also can mean you tend to get more chances but not take them all

i.e. a team with 15K fielding might get 15 wicket chances and pass 9 but the team with 10K will get 5 and pass 4

But the team with better fielding can generate more chances, even if they don't pass a higher percent.

This is seen as like a team with better fielders a player can run to a ball to produce a catch chance whereas a team with shower fielders/slow fielders the player wouldn't reach the ball in time and it'd fall short, therefore not resulting in a wicket check

You should look at it as a positive. Look how many more checks you produced!

chrisuzz

Won my match last night against HP but being 12 points behind CF at this point in the season gives me quite slim chances of defending my titl really.


Got challenged to a youth friendly on sunday by some random so accepted it.
Match Ratings
   Pineapple Panthers   chrisuzz
Batting - Top Order   5,223   5,919
Batting - Middle Order   3,828   5,641
Batting - Tail   2,981   3,755
Bowling - Seam   4,562 (16)   6,479 (24)
Bowling - Spin   4,779 (24)   7,257 (16)
Fielding/Keeping   5,306   6,456
Overall   84,528   110,827

Ratings for next season are going to be great with only 1 19year old playing in that match things will look good for my side next season :)

Also if anyone is up for an under 18 friendly ill be free whenever :) have all slots free




Nails

Croughton Corinthians   New Jersey Devils
Batting - Top Order   11,774   11,785
Batting - Middle Order   10,300   9,084
Batting - Tail   4,950   4,205
Bowling - Seam   10,683 (40)   11,657 (30)
Bowling - Spin   12,763 (10)   12,442 (20)
Fielding/Keeping   11,686   13,758
Overall   193,701   197,224

Best win I have had in ages.

J. Jackman 8.1-0-30-0, J. Friel 65 (92b), A. Raja 34 (41b)
End of over 36 (6 runs) - New Jersey Devils(140-3) RR 3.89
35.1 6 Jackman to Raja

Needed 2 runs to win, Raja his a 6 off the 1st delivery of the 36th over. He was 2nd and we were 4th so an important win to help prevent demotion as 4th to 7th all on 2 wins each.

Bowled him out after 40.4 overs on sunny/uneven for 135 and then chased it down without issue. Surprised just how easy that was.

Nails

cbf edit...

Shows what happens when fielding goes well

10/12 wicket checks for my boys. All wickets coming from fielding.

Also 13/16 general fielding checks passed.

His team:

2/3 wicket checks passed
5/18 general fielding checks passed.

PowerBug

So i played Nails' affiliate today in a friendly, because according to him his affiliate is much better (H2H matches prove that) and I told him any pitch, any time, I'd beat him. So when he chose a Windy/Slow, my worst pitch (The only one that his main beat me on in the 8shes) I was worried.

Match Ratings
  New Jersey Devils PowerBugCC
Batting - Top Order 12,360 10,410
Batting - Middle Order 9,267 10,129
Batting - Tail 4,258 5,181
Bowling - Seam 11,730 (30) 11,356 (20)
Bowling - Spin 12,903 (20) 11,314 (30)
Fielding/Keeping 13,963 13,850
Overall 202,169 195,905

PowerBugCC won by 15 runs.

A team where EVERY player is outs/outs (Except Aronstam who is outs/expert) beat a cocky manager who has a heap of spect/spect players and some even better.

Yet he still refuses to admit that my team is better. ::)

Anyone, Anywhere, Any pitch, Anytime.
Leader of the King Karl Amon fan club
Coach of WXV side Rio De Janeiro Jaguars
2023 SC: Rank 126

Nails

You won 1 match against my affiliate, doesn't make them "better"

PowerBug

Well, I beat your affiliate on my worst which is also one of it not your best pitch. That makes a pretty strong arguement, as does the 6-2 H2H.
Leader of the King Karl Amon fan club
Coach of WXV side Rio De Janeiro Jaguars
2023 SC: Rank 126

Nails

5-6 of those matches are on a dry. Any team with 3 spinners vs. 2 spinners are better on a dry

Also on a spinner's pitch today you had 3 spinners vs. 2...

Only because you had an extra spinner today.

PowerBug

#54128
Better management skills. You can't use that as an excuse, toherwise you can use it every time even though it's your own fault. On a Windy/Slow i have  2 mediums and 3 spinners, on a Humid/Uneven i have 2 fasties, a fm and two mediums, on a Hot/Hard i have a 2xf, m, fs, ws.

You could use the same excuse everytime when the truth is it's your fautl for not having the extra players to accomodate for those pitch types.
Leader of the King Karl Amon fan club
Coach of WXV side Rio De Janeiro Jaguars
2023 SC: Rank 126

Nails

Well I could do what you do and buy a squad of 100 players and only ever amount to being a mediocre team

or establish a team with future gun potential. Only average age of like 24-25 and rating 202K

Unlike your team which is pretty much as good as peaked. If I was to have such a range of players I'd have to have a lesser standard of player across the board.

PowerBug

Right, well i have a squad of 19.

At 28 is when the super fast power training stops, so I assume you mean 28yo when you say "peaked". Of my 19,
Tonge is 32, and he is a reserve to Aronstam now.
Mukund is 30, and I have a 22yo replacement which will be playing ahead of him next season.
Craig is 30, the current replacement is only 20, so he'll probably play on through next season but Byrd will be right to the season after.
Oldfield is 28. I have a rfm and rfs (AR) which are both 20 and are being trained up in my superior SA.
The rest of my side hasn't peaked yet and I didn't rate too much under you.

Not to mention the 19 youths that i have in my lavish YA.
Leader of the King Karl Amon fan club
Coach of WXV side Rio De Janeiro Jaguars
2023 SC: Rank 126

Nails

30 > 22 = huge drop in your side.

PowerBug

If that's the only negative you have then I think I'm doing a fair effort, especially since I'm winning our matches.

Fact is, I'm beating you, fact is, my club is more successful than both of yours. fact is, I'm better right now.
Leader of the King Karl Amon fan club
Coach of WXV side Rio De Janeiro Jaguars
2023 SC: Rank 126

Cookie311993

Quote from: Nails on September 01, 2013, 03:58:25 PM
Well I could do what you do and buy a squad of 100 players and only ever amount to being a mediocre team

or establish a team with future gun potential. Only average age of like 24-25 and rating 202K

Unlike your team which is pretty much as good as peaked. If I was to have such a range of players I'd have to have a lesser standard of player across the board.
Stop saying you have a gun side because you don't. You don't have anyone that's a real standout in skills

The real reason you are losing is tactics.

Nails