Hille or Naitanui?

[yeahsup]

My bias friend, a West Coast supporter, believes Nic Naitanui is a better ruckman than David Hille.
I think he is crazy, how can you say that when he has only played 10-odd games when Hille has the experience of well over 100 games?
Not to mention Hille's stellar peak that he showed to the league back in 2008.
So, tell me, who do you think is the better player?

[DWEBBY5]

i have a bias friend who goes for essendon aswell     cough* Hillhero13  *cough :P

[HillHero13]

yes i am a bombers supporter... maybe a bit bias but not fully....

[ossie85]

Every team if given the choice, would choose Nic Nat over Hille. Including Essendon. But at this moment, Hille is the better ruckmen. Nic Nat will be a far greater player

[Justin Bieber]

Hille is the better ruckmen. Nic Nat will be a far greater player

Hille for the now ruckman. Nicnat will only be chosen because they can build a team around him. he's a future player.

[yeahsup]

All im asking is who has been the better player in their careers up to now.
Nothing to do with the future.
He already believes Nic Nat has done better.

[Justin Bieber]

All im asking is who has been the better player in their careers up to now.
Nothing to do with the future.
He already believes Nic Nat has done better.

if he does, what is he on? ;D

[yeahsup]

hahaha, not so sure..  ???

[reesbr]

remember hille was rucking against the best ruckman in the comp yesterday

[Master Q]

Hille is better ATM, but if i was a coach, i would take Nic Nat.

[MissPiesFF]

Hard to tell ATM, Hille is more experienced and therefore IMO well proven. As for Nicnat. HE just throws himself all over the ground, yes he does it with style but he still has a long way to go in terms of understanding the entire game. Maybe Nicnat needs some time in defense also so he can get an understanding of how to play against it and what to look for. :)

[Blakeyboy88]

My bias friend, a West Coast supporter, believes Nic Naitanui is a better ruckman than David Hille.
I think he is crazy, how can you say that when he has only played 10-odd games when Hille has the experience of well over 100 games?
Not to mention Hille's stellar peak that he showed to the league back in 2008.
So, tell me, who do you think is the better player?

HAHAHAHA jess. :)
im guessing this bias friend is Sushi?