2021 Player X vs. Player Y

[bunyips]

Ridley v Dusty

Dusty

[bunyips]

If danger gets more than three weeks I’m torn between these guys:

Mills vs Zorko

Trading Mills obviously means I’m shuffling players

[Colliwobblers]

Mills looked GREAT.

Zorko had 114 with 6 clangers and 5 free kicks against,  that's 44 points off his score so 158.

That doesn't really help you does it :)

Can't go wrong.

[Ringo]

Can not go wrong with either. Zorko benefited from the work Swans out into Neale and this may not be always the case.

Zorko needs to control his aggression especially as already been fined this year to avoid suspension.

Mills looked great in new role and in saying that Lions defence was pathetic so would like to see another week from Mills for true gauge but unfortunately do not have that option.

That is a little bit of the contra for both but as been said toss a coin.

[Samsturmfels]

Ridley v Dusty

Dusty

Thanks mate. I'm still undecided what I'm gonna do I could do the following
-Danger/Rowell to
1) Walsh and Dusty
2) Walsh and Ridley
3) Titch and Taranto (plus about 50k in bank instead of 25k).

[Wanderer]

Ridley v Dusty

Dusty

Thanks mate. I'm still undecided what I'm gonna do I could do the following
-Danger/Rowell to
1) Walsh and Dusty
2) Walsh and Ridley
3) Titch and Taranto (plus about 50k in bank instead of 25k).

Have you looked into which option is best for your bye structure?

[Bully]

Ridley v Dusty

Dusty

Thanks mate. I'm still undecided what I'm gonna do I could do the following
-Danger/Rowell to
1) Walsh and Dusty
2) Walsh and Ridley
3) Titch and Taranto (plus about 50k in bank instead of 25k).

I like option 3, you get a top10 mid & a guy who should crack the ton & be suitable for M8. The cash will be handy for rookie corrections.

Walsh & Dusty still great picks but I suspect Dusty will have his days where he spends most of the time forward, hence more obtainable.

Ridley does look good but one season doesn't maketh the man.

[Samsturmfels]

Ridley v Dusty

Dusty

Thanks mate. I'm still undecided what I'm gonna do I could do the following
-Danger/Rowell to
1) Walsh and Dusty
2) Walsh and Ridley
3) Titch and Taranto (plus about 50k in bank instead of 25k).

Have you looked into which option is best for your bye structure?

to be honest atm im more focused on which picks will score the most points for me. Bye structure will change quite alot before the byes.

[Samsturmfels]

Ridley v Dusty

Dusty

Thanks mate. I'm still undecided what I'm gonna do I could do the following
-Danger/Rowell to
1) Walsh and Dusty
2) Walsh and Ridley
3) Titch and Taranto (plus about 50k in bank instead of 25k).

I like option 3, you get a top10 mid & a guy who should crack the ton & be suitable for M8. The cash will be handy for rookie corrections.

Walsh & Dusty still great picks but I suspect Dusty will have his days where he spends most of the time forward, hence more obtainable.

Ridley does look good but one season doesn't maketh the man.

Thanks mate. I do like option 2 because it gives me Titch, however i am worried that Taranto will spend too much time forward.

[Bully]

Ridley v Dusty

Dusty

Thanks mate. I'm still undecided what I'm gonna do I could do the following
-Danger/Rowell to
1) Walsh and Dusty
2) Walsh and Ridley
3) Titch and Taranto (plus about 50k in bank instead of 25k).

I like option 3, you get a top10 mid & a guy who should crack the ton & be suitable for M8. The cash will be handy for rookie corrections.

Walsh & Dusty still great picks but I suspect Dusty will have his days where he spends most of the time forward, hence more obtainable.

Ridley does look good but one season doesn't maketh the man.

Thanks mate. I do like option 2 because it gives me Titch, however i am worried that Taranto will spend too much time forward.

Taranto could actually benefit from being forward but I suppose we need to see that on the scoreboard.

The other option is Titch/Zorko, do you have the funds for this?

[Wanderer]

Ridley v Dusty

Dusty

Thanks mate. I'm still undecided what I'm gonna do I could do the following
-Danger/Rowell to
1) Walsh and Dusty
2) Walsh and Ridley
3) Titch and Taranto (plus about 50k in bank instead of 25k).

How about Titch and Zac Williams (or Hunter Clark)?

[Bully]

Ridley v Dusty

Dusty

Thanks mate. I'm still undecided what I'm gonna do I could do the following
-Danger/Rowell to
1) Walsh and Dusty
2) Walsh and Ridley
3) Titch and Taranto (plus about 50k in bank instead of 25k).

How about Titch and Zac Williams (or Hunter Clark)?

Don't mind that suggestion either.

I think the goal here should be getting two keepers who are vying for top 10 in their respective lines. I'd even entertain going Sidebottom/Dusty as I think there's a strong chance they finish top 6 forwards.

[Wanderer]

Ridley v Dusty

Dusty

Thanks mate. I'm still undecided what I'm gonna do I could do the following
-Danger/Rowell to
1) Walsh and Dusty
2) Walsh and Ridley
3) Titch and Taranto (plus about 50k in bank instead of 25k).

How about Titch and Zac Williams (or Hunter Clark)?

Don't mind that suggestion either.

I think the goal here should be getting two keepers who are vying for top 10 in their respective lines. I'd even entertain going Sidebottom/Dusty as I think there's a strong chance they finish top 6 forwards.

If Sidey can stay on the park, he will be top 6-8 forward easily, and we all know Dusty is going to be one of the best.

[whynot102]

Heppell/Dusty or McGrath Stephenson

[Bully]

Heppell/Dusty or McGrath Stephenson

Heppell/Dusty

Less risk, 1 absolute keeper & a really nice stepping stone to a Neale or Oliver.