Round 13 Trades

[Bones Bombers]

Trade 1: Simpson to Foot.
Trade 2: Georgiades to Big O or Sturt to Woodcock just to have a forward emg available. And some cash generation.

Which way should I go?

Simpson to Foot is my first trade too.
Georgiades out, Brander to FWD, Rivers to DEF, Parker in.

Big O I think is a 50/50 proposition, perhaps cash in the bank for a proven scorer next week is a better option?

I could go up to Greenwood but there really isn’t much to be excited about in the forwards is there?
Have Martin, Whitfield, Petracca and Simpkin.

[backpocket]

Goldy & greenwood
Or
Marshall & Martin?

[Bones Bombers]

Goldy & greenwood
Or
Marshall & Martin?

I’d say Goldy and Greenwood

[tkringle]

Keeping Gawn.

Have to deal with Sicily and Simpson. Got Draper as cover so figure I should be better score wise by getting a rookie like Wicks/Bytel/Schoenberg off field for Fyfe.

Means having Fyfe + Draper on field instead of Wicks/Bytel + NicNat/Goldstein AND still got Gawn for (hopefully) next week.

[Samsturmfels]

JPK will be close to 400k in two weeks

[backpocket]

Goldy & greenwood
Or
Marshall & Martin?

I’d say Goldy and Greenwood

What about
Goldy and greenwood
Vs
Nic nat and dusty?

[Blues Blues Blues]

Goldy & greenwood
Or
Marshall & Martin?

I’d say Goldy and Greenwood

What about
Goldy and greenwood
Vs
Nic nat and dusty?

Nic Nat surely gets rested

[backpocket]

Goldy & greenwood
Or
Marshall & Martin?

I’d say Goldy and Greenwood

What about
Goldy and greenwood
Vs
Nic nat and dusty?

Nic Nat surely gets rested

This week?

[Rusty00]

Trading Sicily > Z Williams, but really struggling to choose a second defender to bring in for Houston?

Have $509k to spend and already have Docherty, Ridley, Stewart.

Don’t want anyone with Rd.15 bye, so rules out Daniel.
Would probably prefer not the Rd.16 bye as well. Maynard is the only 1 I’d consider, as I’m wary of Houli’s return affecting Short.
Round 14 bye I only have Neale, so would consider. Witherden’s JS makes me wary though?
Thurlow is surely a trap, and will be hard to upgrade again later due to lack of trades. Extra money would be handy though?
Mills average was boosted with a couple of large scores playing loose in defence. His role week-to-week seems uncertain?
Saad is solid but doesn’t have a big ceiling for the Best 18 rounds?

[Samsturmfels]

Trading Sicily > Z Williams, but really struggling to choose a second defender to bring in for Houston?

Have $509k to spend and already have Docherty, Ridley, Stewart.

Don’t want anyone with Rd.15 bye, so rules out Daniel.
Would probably prefer not the Rd.16 bye as well. Maynard is the only 1 I’d consider, as I’m wary of Houli’s return affecting Short.
Round 14 bye I only have Neale, so would consider. Witherden’s JS makes me wary though?
Thurlow is surely a trap, and will be hard to upgrade again later due to lack of trades. Extra money would be handy though?
Mills average was boosted with a couple of large scores playing loose in defence. His role week-to-week seems uncertain?
Saad is solid but doesn’t have a big ceiling for the Best 18 rounds?

id get Saad, at least he doesnt have a bye.

[Sepcialone]

Trying to bring in a Sicily replacement
Finding luke ryan at 580 abit overpriced and the best pick that screams out is Zac williams
I had my eyes on Hayes aswell and waited till next round to pick him up at his cheapest.
My dilemma is Is having Williams, Hayes, Whitfield and J. kelly way too many GWS players?

[whynot102]

I am in the same situation however thinking of bringing in Kelly is four GWS players to much

Trying to bring in a Sicily replacement
Finding luke ryan at 580 abit overpriced and the best pick that screams out is Zac williams
I had my eyes on Hayes aswell and waited till next round to pick him up at his cheapest.
My dilemma is Is having Williams, Hayes, Whitfield and J. kelly way too many GWS players?

[RaisyDaisy]

This whole "too many players from the same side" thing makes no sense (Only for byes, but not relevant as GWS has had theirs)

If you were looking to have 4 GWS mids, then sure, but you're talking about guys on different lines so it's more than fine having 4 of them

If you think they're the best pick for your side, then that's all that matters :)

[Wanderer]

This whole "too many players from the same side" thing makes no sense (Only for byes, but not relevant as GWS has had theirs)

If you were looking to have 4 GWS mids, then sure, but you're talking about guys on different lines so it's more than fine having 4 of them

If you think they're the best pick for your side, then that's all that matters :)

The one slight risk (byes excluded) is if the team loses by a big margin, less of the total scoring generally goes to the losing team. I'm talking about big losses. Not sure if there is a risk of GWS losing by a very big margin though.

[Sabretooth Tigers]

 :)

Was taking Lloyd a couple of weeks ago but went Zerrett instead. So this week have gone   out  Sicily  and  M Pickett
in   Lloyd  and  Fyfe.

;)