Darcy Byrne-Jones

[walloo44]

Have seen 0 to no mention of this bloke and i am really surprised. Lots of people are jumping on Dan Houston However i think DBJ is the pick.

Post Bye Round last year :

DBJ: 94 (lead Port Adelaide, AND INCLUDES a 7 (inj))
Houston 88.7 avg

Floor Last year:

DBJ: 52 (3 sub 70, 6 sub 80) (excluding injured 7)
Dan Houston: 54 (4 sub 70, 6 sub 80)


Ceiling Last Year:

DBJ: 130, with 7 Tons
Houston: 134, with 4 Tons


Price:
DBJ: 447k
Houston: $475k

AVG:
DBJ: 87.2 (91 without his 7 again)
Houston: 89.3


Top it all off, DBJ owned in just 1% of teams, and Houston 18% of teams!

[jvalles69]

I mentioned this in the defenders thread about a month ago...

[walloo44]

Brilliant, sorry I didn’t see you comment a month ago, hopefully you’ll have some good stuff to add to the discussion!

[RaisyDaisy]

I mentioned this in the defenders thread about a month ago...

Only a month ago? I mentioned him nearly 2 months ago :P

[erich1036]

Have seen 0 to no mention of this bloke and i am really surprised. Lots of people are jumping on Dan Houston However i think DBJ is the pick.

Post Bye Round last year :

DBJ: 94 (lead Port Adelaide, AND INCLUDES a 7 (inj))
Houston 88.7 avg

Floor Last year:

DBJ: 52 (3 sub 70, 6 sub 80) (excluding injured 7)
Dan Houston: 54 (4 sub 70, 6 sub 80)


Ceiling Last Year:

DBJ: 130, with 7 Tons
Houston: 134, with 4 Tons


Price:
DBJ: 447k
Houston: $475k

AVG:
DBJ: 87.2 (91 without his 7 again)
Houston: 89.3


Top it all off, DBJ owned in just 1% of teams, and Houston 18% of teams!

How was the 7 injury-affected? He played 81% TOG and played the next week? No mention of an injury anywhere.

[jvalles69]

DBJ seems like a good option on paper, but it's always a risk bringing in a player who hasn't been an elite SCer especially if you were considering him a keeper, I'll keep an eye on him though and would rather go Houston now that Wines is injured.

[shaker]

Have seen 0 to no mention of this bloke and i am really surprised. Lots of people are jumping on Dan Houston However i think DBJ is the pick.

Post Bye Round last year :

DBJ: 94 (lead Port Adelaide, AND INCLUDES a 7 (inj))
Houston 88.7 avg

Floor Last year:

DBJ: 52 (3 sub 70, 6 sub 80) (excluding injured 7)
Dan Houston: 54 (4 sub 70, 6 sub 80)


Ceiling Last Year:

DBJ: 130, with 7 Tons
Houston: 134, with 4 Tons


Price:
DBJ: 447k
Houston: $475k

AVG:
DBJ: 87.2 (91 without his 7 again)
Houston: 89.3


Top it all off, DBJ owned in just 1% of teams, and Houston 18% of teams!

How was the 7 injury-affected? He played 81% TOG and played the next week? No mention of an injury anywhere.

Yep I hunted high and low for an explanation for that 7 against the Roos and there is none a mare symbol in FF archives but the rest of his scores are good maybe he was sick would be best reason.

[Nige]

Have seen 0 to no mention of this bloke and i am really surprised. Lots of people are jumping on Dan Houston However i think DBJ is the pick.

Post Bye Round last year :

DBJ: 94 (lead Port Adelaide, AND INCLUDES a 7 (inj))
Houston 88.7 avg

Floor Last year:

DBJ: 52 (3 sub 70, 6 sub 80) (excluding injured 7)
Dan Houston: 54 (4 sub 70, 6 sub 80)


Ceiling Last Year:

DBJ: 130, with 7 Tons
Houston: 134, with 4 Tons


Price:
DBJ: 447k
Houston: $475k

AVG:
DBJ: 87.2 (91 without his 7 again)
Houston: 89.3


Top it all off, DBJ owned in just 1% of teams, and Houston 18% of teams!

How was the 7 injury-affected? He played 81% TOG and played the next week? No mention of an injury anywhere.

Yep I hunted high and low for an explanation for that 7 against the Roos and there is none a mare symbol in FF archives but the rest of his scores are good maybe he was sick would be best reason.

Brought him in late last season during his rich vein of form and he was bloody solid in the role he had for the second half of the year where his fantasy output increased a bit. As a result of having him, I watched him pretty closely. In that game where he scored 7, he literally just couldn’t get near it, it was the most ridiculous performance I’ve ever seen when factoring how prolific he’d been prior. So yeah, there was no injury issue, it was just one of those days where he couldn’t get a touch even if he was the only bloke out there.

[Holz]

Yep I hunted high and low for an explanation for that 7 against the Roos and there is none a mare symbol in FF archives but the rest of his scores are good maybe he was sick would be best reason.

North pumped them

Darcy Byrne-Jones   7
Matthew Broadbent   46   
Riley Bonner   40   
Ryan Burton   53   
Justin Westhoff   72   
Tom Clurey   72

from the defenders.

[eaglesman]

No mention due to the fact not worth picking

[frenzy]

I like Nick Haynes GWS aswell and atm starting both Houston and DB-J. All three should give 90 ish a shake. 90's probably the bench mark for defenders, hell Simmo ave'd 90 for 20 years there.

[RaisyDaisy]

No mention due to the fact not worth picking

102avg after the bye, he's worth mentioning

He'll be their main man rebounding out of the back half too especially with Houston moving to the mids

[erich1036]

No mention due to the fact not worth picking

102avg after the bye, he's worth mentioning

He'll be their main man rebounding out of the back half too especially with Houston moving to the mids

Where'd you pull 102 from? He averaged 94 after the bye.

[js19]

No mention due to the fact not worth picking

102avg after the bye, he's worth mentioning

He'll be their main man rebounding out of the back half too especially with Houston moving to the mids

Where'd you pull 102 from? He averaged 94 after the bye.

I'd say by erroneusly removing that 7 as an injury game. Still a good output

[RaisyDaisy]

No mention due to the fact not worth picking

102avg after the bye, he's worth mentioning

He'll be their main man rebounding out of the back half too especially with Houston moving to the mids

Where'd you pull 102 from? He averaged 94 after the bye.

I'd say by erroneusly removing that 7 as an injury game. Still a good output

Yeah, that 7 is a once in a career type outlier - I'm disregarding that

It was actually longer than the bye too - Round 9 to 23 (minus the 7 score round) was 13 games at 102avg

That's extremely good, and definitely worth considering