Cheapest Keeper & most expensive Cash Cow

[enzedder]

Docherty (D2) - Doedee/Robertson/Hill (D3-D5)
Dunkley (M5)- Rowell (M6)
Grundy/Gawn
Smith (F4) - Rankine/King (F5-F6)

Going really cheap down back this year as there seems to be a lot of value at this stage anyways.

Yep, my thinking too.
Docherty (D2) - Doedee/Roberton/Hill (D3-D5) assume you mean Roberton.... same for me
Dunkley (M5)- Rowell (M6) ... Conigs at M5 and Rowell at M6 for me
Grundy/Gawn ... same
Smith (F4) - Rankine/King (F5-F6)... same

[jfitty]

Docherty (D2) - Doedee/Robertson/Hill (D3-D5)
Dunkley (M5)- Rowell (M6)
Grundy/Gawn
Smith (F4) - Rankine/King (F5-F6)

Going really cheap down back this year as there seems to be a lot of value at this stage anyways.

Yep, my thinking too.
Docherty (D2) - Doedee/Roberton/Hill (D3-D5) assume you mean Roberton.... same for me
Dunkley (M5)- Rowell (M6) ... Conigs at M5 and Rowell at M6 for me
Grundy/Gawn ... same
Smith (F4) - Rankine/King (F5-F6)... same

Interesting backline structure, who do you guys have at D1 if you don't mind me asking?

[enzedder]

Docherty (D2) - Doedee/Robertson/Hill (D3-D5)
Dunkley (M5)- Rowell (M6)
Grundy/Gawn
Smith (F4) - Rankine/King (F5-F6)

Going really cheap down back this year as there seems to be a lot of value at this stage anyways.

Yep, my thinking too.
Docherty (D2) - Doedee/Roberton/Hill (D3-D5) assume you mean Roberton.... same for me
Dunkley (M5)- Rowell (M6) ... Conigs at M5 and Rowell at M6 for me
Grundy/Gawn ... same
Smith (F4) - Rankine/King (F5-F6)... same

Interesting backline structure, who do you guys have at D1 if you don't mind me asking?

Sicily

[RaisyDaisy]

My only worry with starting both Doedee and Roberton is that if one of them gets injured or just doesn't score well then we've snookered ourselves as there's nobody else in their price range you'd trade them to

I'll see what happens but my preference is to just start one of them - reduce the risk whilst also having a fallback option

Robbo gets the nod for mine - Doedee coming off a major injury, plus who knows if McAsey and co will impact his scoring

[RoughRed]

My only worry with starting both Doedee and Roberton is that if one of them gets injured or just doesn't score well then we've snookered ourselves as there's nobody else in their price range you'd trade them to

I'll see what happens but my preference is to just start one of them - reduce the risk whilst also having a fallback option

Robbo gets the nod for mine - Doedee coming off a major injury, plus who knows if McAsey and co will impact his scoring

Good thoughts RD, having me thinking, thanks

[Money Shot]

Docherty (D2) - Doedee/Robertson/Hill (D3-D5)
Dunkley (M5)- Rowell (M6)
Grundy/Gawn
Smith (F4) - Rankine/King (F5-F6)

Going really cheap down back this year as there seems to be a lot of value at this stage anyways.

Yep, my thinking too.
Docherty (D2) - Doedee/Roberton/Hill (D3-D5) assume you mean Roberton.... same for me
Dunkley (M5)- Rowell (M6) ... Conigs at M5 and Rowell at M6 for me
Grundy/Gawn ... same
Smith (F4) - Rankine/King (F5-F6)... same

Interesting backline structure, who do you guys have at D1 if you don't mind me asking?

Laird for me. Super consistent and makes it look a little more stable down back.

[oh_lol]

Robbo gets the nod for mine - Doedee coming off a major injury, plus who knows if McAsey and co will impact his scoring

I agree. People getting sucked into Doedee from his first year. Also with Keath leaving, Doedee will take his role I think. Won't bode well for scores.

[frenzy]

Am I the only person that thinks starting Dylan Roberton is a risk. If he turns out 70's, that is an expensive rookie and it's a fail. I would rather start another rookie and save $100K plus. With that $100k, you could turn Heeney into Danger and that's a win.

[eaglesman]

Am I the only person that thinks starting Dylan Roberton is a risk. If he turns out 70's, that is an expensive rookie and it's a fail. I would rather start another rookie and save $100K plus. With that $100k, you could turn Heeney into Danger and that's a win.

Find me the extra rookie and I’ll follow ya and dump him.

[RaisyDaisy]

Am I the only person that thinks starting Dylan Roberton is a risk. If he turns out 70's, that is an expensive rookie and it's a fail. I would rather start another rookie and save $100K plus. With that $100k, you could turn Heeney into Danger and that's a win.

Is 70's really a fail?

Darcy Moore went similar and I consider him a success

Most people starting Robbo have him at D4 - you can't start a rookie there

Seems like a pretty low risk move starting him imo

[frenzy]

Am I the only person that thinks starting Dylan Roberton is a risk. If he turns out 70's, that is an expensive rookie and it's a fail. I would rather start another rookie and save $100K plus. With that $100k, you could turn Heeney into Danger and that's a win.

Find me the extra rookie and I’ll follow ya and dump him.

Start another premos in def, plenty rookies down the ground

[frenzy]

Am I the only person that thinks starting Dylan Roberton is a risk. If he turns out 70's, that is an expensive rookie and it's a fail. I would rather start another rookie and save $100K plus. With that $100k, you could turn Heeney into Danger and that's a win.

Is 70's really a fail?

Darcy Moore went similar and I consider him a success

Most people starting Robbo have him at D4 - you can't start a rookie there

Seems like a pretty low risk move starting him imo

That's my point RD, you could of had the same success with another rookie. Only slightly better than rookie score at a premium rookie price.  The funds saved go to greatly improving another position, ie Heeney 90 ave against Danger 117 ave. If there's more and cheaper alternatives down the field so be it. We may have to start a weak line and a stronger def, all depends on  rookie availability.

[RaisyDaisy]

Am I the only person that thinks starting Dylan Roberton is a risk. If he turns out 70's, that is an expensive rookie and it's a fail. I would rather start another rookie and save $100K plus. With that $100k, you could turn Heeney into Danger and that's a win.

Is 70's really a fail?

Darcy Moore went similar and I consider him a success

Most people starting Robbo have him at D4 - you can't start a rookie there

Seems like a pretty low risk move starting him imo

That's my point RD, you could of had the same success with another rookie. Only slightly better than rookie score at a premium rookie price.  The funds saved go to greatly improving another position, ie Heeney 90 ave against Danger 117 ave. If there's more and cheaper alternatives down the field so be it. We may have to start a weak line and a stronger def, all depends on  rookie availability.

Gotta factor in the JS too though. Darcy Moore, and now Robbo, were best 22 where as all these rookies could get dropped

[eaglesman]

Am I the only person that thinks starting Dylan Roberton is a risk. If he turns out 70's, that is an expensive rookie and it's a fail. I would rather start another rookie and save $100K plus. With that $100k, you could turn Heeney into Danger and that's a win.

Is 70's really a fail?

Darcy Moore went similar and I consider him a success

Most people starting Robbo have him at D4 - you can't start a rookie there

Seems like a pretty low risk move starting him imo

That's my point RD, you could of had the same success with another rookie. Only slightly better than rookie score at a premium rookie price.  The funds saved go to greatly improving another position, ie Heeney 90 ave against Danger 117 ave. If there's more and cheaper alternatives down the field so be it. We may have to start a weak line and a stronger def, all depends on  rookie availability.

Gotta factor in the JS too though. Darcy Moore, and now Robbo, were best 22 where as all these rookies could get dropped

Do the best 22s n then tell me there’s enough safe rookies frenzy ... there isn’t

[frenzy]

Anyone, including best 22 can get dropped.,