2020 Player X v Player y

[Money Shot]

Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?

I like Coniglio and Laird. But like Olivier/Laird out of the above two.

[Bluesman]

Gawn/Jelwood/Doedee
vs
Jacobs/Zerrett/Sicily

[Bluesman]

Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?

Oliver & Laird. I'm not a huge fan of Cogs with their plethora of midfield options

[Colley Dogs]

Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?

Oliver & Laird

(Because of Oliver)

[Edgeovertherest]

Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...

Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger

Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver

Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance

Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1

[RaisyDaisy]

Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...

Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger

Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver

Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance

Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1

Option 3: Macrae, Neale, Cripps, Danger, Oliver

[Edgeovertherest]

Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...

Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger

Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver

Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance

Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1

Option 3: Macrae, Neale, Cripps, Danger, Oliver

Interesting... would like to know what you like about cripps, danger and oliver (macrae and neale I understand) vs Fyfe, Kelly, Dunkley and Titch. Injury worries maybe?

[Southstorm]

Titch has only just started running recently from what I gather and didn't take part in the match sim this week. Would not be planning for him round 1.

[jvalles69]

Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood

[tommy10]

Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood

Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.

[eaglesman]

Walters v heeney

[dylanclements]

Walters v heeney

I'm dealing with the same question. Right now I have Heeney, partly because of price. I am not at all confident this is the right decision!

I can't believe I'm saying it but Greene is worth a look for ~500k F3s too

[SilverLion]

Walters v heeney

I'm dealing with the same question. Right now I have Heeney, partly because of price. I am not at all confident this is the right decision!

I can't believe I'm saying it but Greene is worth a look for ~500k F3s too

I'd be going Greenwood ahead of those 3 personally.

[jvalles69]

Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood

Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.

Got Dev at F4 already.

[dylanclements]

I'd be going Greenwood ahead of those 3 personally.

I don't love this one personally. Greenwood has averaged 85 in his three seasons and managed to break 100 three times last season. True that more time in the guts could help him but the upside surely isn't huge and I'd be predicting pretty close to 85 again.

Greene averaged 94, finishing last season with six straight 100s, two of which were over 130.

Heeney averaged 94, finishing last season with 5 100s from his last 9.

I'm going with if I remember Holz's theory that someone who scores well staying on the park is a better gamble than someone who scores less well lifting their numbers. Even if Greenwood adds 10ppg, he is just even with Greene and Heeney.