vc/c round 17 discussion

[jfitty]

take that u grundy doubters

Grundy doubter, Danger believer here ;D

[tkringle]

Thanks Danger  8)

[Carn]

take that u grundy doubters

Grundy doubter, Danger believer here ;D

Big risk for the 26pt gain. Well played though.

[RoughRed]

Danger danger!

[tkringle]

take that u grundy doubters

Grundy doubter, Danger believer here ;D

Big risk for the 26pt gain. Well played though.

Would say Danger would have been selected only by those who did not VC Grundy (like me). No way anyone would have not taken Grundy’s VC score if they had it.

[RoughRed]

take that u grundy doubters

Grundy doubter, Danger believer here ;D

Big risk for the 26pt gain. Well played though.

Would say Danger would have been selected only by those who did not VC Grundy (like me). No way anyone would have not taken Grundy’s VC score if they had it.

I have Grundy but decided Danger VC, Macrae C
The unfailing logic of a good red wine

[igotworms]

take that u grundy doubters

Grundy doubter, Danger believer here ;D

;)

[igotworms]

Im all sorted in my classic with Danger as my VC, but have a slight conundrum in my draft and wanted the FF communities personal acumen. I'm assuming Sutcliffe goes straight to Neale today, but whats the chances of him negating Neales dominance as of late? First game back in at AFL level. My other options being taking Kreuzers 119 (and my lowest scoring bench player) or Dunkley against the Dees?

[backpocket]

So I went Sloane VC so now need to make the decision of:
Coniglio, gawn, macrae, dunks, neale... thoughts community?

[dylanclements]

So I went Sloane VC so now need to make the decision of:
Coniglio, gawn, macrae, dunks, neale... thoughts community?

I'm saying Macrae. I went Grundy VC, was going Fyfe or Macrae C if needed.

[backpocket]

So I went Sloane VC so now need to make the decision of:
Coniglio, gawn, macrae, dunks, neale... thoughts community?

I'm saying Macrae. I went Grundy VC, was going Fyfe or Macrae C if needed.

Worst part was I was always going danger vc and had it on Sloane as a throw off to my opponent then I ordered dinner at the restaurant and realised they both started at 7:25... arghhhhh

[no eye deer]

So I went Sloane VC so now need to make the decision of:
Coniglio, gawn, macrae, dunks, neale... thoughts community?

I'm saying Macrae. I went Grundy VC, was going Fyfe or Macrae C if needed.

Worst part was I was always going danger vc and had it on Sloane as a throw off to my opponent then I ordered dinner at the restaurant and realised they both started at 7:25... arghhhhh

Ah, the pitfalls of playing mind games hey?

[backpocket]

So I went Sloane VC so now need to make the decision of:
Coniglio, gawn, macrae, dunks, neale... thoughts community?

I'm saying Macrae. I went Grundy VC, was going Fyfe or Macrae C if needed.

Worst part was I was always going danger vc and had it on Sloane as a throw off to my opponent then I ordered dinner at the restaurant and realised they both started at 7:25... arghhhhh

Ah, the pitfalls of playing mind games hey?

And my only hope in coniglio goes down the drain. Going from 3rd all year to sitting nice at 9th. Love SuperCoach

[Woppa15]

No logical reason to other than a good ol’ Hail Mary but did anyone happen to through the C on Dunkley.....?

[backpocket]

No logical reason to other than a good ol’ Hail Mary but did anyone happen to through the C on Dunkley.....?

Had to pull a trigger after Coniglio gave me a pod 0... so I went a pod Dunkley as straight captain... 202... yup...