Round 13 Trades

[EA100]

Bit torn on trades this week..

DEF: Laird, Ryan, Hurn, Williams, Hore, Duursma (Gardiner, Answerth)
MID: Cripps, Neale, Fyfe, Crouch, Macrae, Cunnington, Oliver, Liberatore (Atkins, Stocker, Scott)
RUC: Grundy, Gawn (Bines)
FWD: Dunkley, Danger, Daniel, Heeney, Worpel, Balta (Begley, Young)

14 trades left + 101k

I feel like i need to get rid of Balta. Has a high B/E and with Astbury still out i'm afraid he's going to play a similar role to last week, which keeps him out of his rucking role and in defence constantly. If i get rid of Atkins and go down to Clark i can upgrade Balta to Boak and complete my forward line for now until i eventually get kelly in with a luxury trade later on. Or i could go Balta to Gray and then go atkins down to clarke and upgrade duursma. Unfortunately i only have 16 this week if Young doesn't play so going atkins to clarke helps..

[kilbluff1985]

Bit torn on trades this week..

DEF: Laird, Ryan, Hurn, Williams, Hore, Duursma (Gardiner, Answerth)
MID: Cripps, Neale, Fyfe, Crouch, Macrae, Cunnington, Oliver, Liberatore (Atkins, Stocker, Scott)
RUC: Grundy, Gawn (Bines)
FWD: Dunkley, Danger, Daniel, Heeney, Worpel, Balta (Begley, Young)

14 trades left + 101k

I feel like i need to get rid of Balta. Has a high B/E and with Astbury still out i'm afraid he's going to play a similar role to last week, which keeps him out of his rucking role and in defence constantly. If i get rid of Atkins and go down to Clark i can upgrade Balta to Boak and complete my forward line for now until i eventually get kelly in with a luxury trade later on. Or i could go Balta to Gray and then go atkins down to clarke and upgrade duursma. Unfortunately i only have 16 this week if Young doesn't play so going atkins to clarke helps..

yeah id be doing atkins/balta to clarke/boak maybe stocker to bewley if he plays to

[Samsturmfels]

Have gone: Clark, Hayes, Baker to Gardner, Clarke and Boak (99k in bank)

Would i be better off getting Brewley instead of Clarke?

Also at this current moment ill only have 17 playing after those trades. To fix this i could trade answerth instead of baker, howerver i would still be a few thousand short still for getting boak.

[tkringle]

If all of Bewley, Young, Corbett and Burgess get named, I might hold off on bringing in a 1 game rookie as I will have 18 playing.. well 17 + Corbett..

Looking to go

B Smith - Ryan
Hayes - Bewley

[Hazza09]

So ive come down to these 3 trade options...for now!

Pett - Dunkley is 100% locked in!

1. I can go Answerth - Naish & Stocker - Clarke (127K in bank)
or
2. I can go Answerth - Naish & Atkins - Clarke (246K in bank)
or
3. I can miss out on Naish so i can bring him in after his Bye
and go Atkins - Clarke & Stocker - Hately ( if named ) or Bewley (195K OR 226K in bank)

[Samsturmfels]

So ive come down to these 3 trade options...for now!

Pett - Dunkley is 100% locked in!

1. I can go Answerth - Naish & Stocker - Clarke (127K in bank)
or
2. I can go Answerth - Naish & Atkins - Clarke (246K in bank)
or
3. I can miss out on Naish so i can bring him in after his Bye
and go Atkins - Clarke & Stocker - Hately ( if named ) or Bewley (195K OR 226K in bank)

Id go 1 or 2 if you have enough players for next week. 2 if you need cash and 1 if you want to keep/use atkins as an emergency.

now what should i do ^^^^

[RaisyDaisy]

Have gone: Clark, Hayes, Baker to Gardner, Clarke and Boak (99k in bank)

Would i be better off getting Brewley instead of Clarke?

Also at this current moment ill only have 17 playing after those trades. To fix this i could trade answerth instead of baker, howerver i would still be a few thousand short still for getting boak.

Trade Answerth instead of Baker to field 18

Grab Bewley or Hind instead of Clark, which allows you to still get Boak

[AN1611]

Sad state of events but...trade Crisp or Hore out?

[HoleMeal]

Sad state of events but...trade Crisp or Hore out?

Really?

Prob Crisp. Not good enough for a keeper. And hore will make a little bit more coin.

[Hazza09]

Worth trading out Burgess instead of Answerth for Naish seeing as Gold Coast and Richmond have the same bye?

[tkringle]

screw it. taking a risk and bringing in the hoff for cover. My forward cover post byes is non existent (Young + Corbett) and gives me ruck cover for the year. he can be my F7/Ruck cover post byes..

Corbett - Hoff
Hayes - Bewley

Means i can get 16 on the field at least..

[Mat0369]

I have to make three trades to get 18. Right now I have Stocker>Bewley and Answerth>Gardner

If Hately is named I'll do a Hayes>Hately trade, otherwise I'll do an upgrade.

[Carn]

Playing 16 this week with rocky/corbett/Burguess out

[batt]

Just a reminder that squeezing so hard for an 18th player is usually not worth the extra 50 odd points you'll get out of it.

With that warning to myself, I'm squeezing to get to 18 so Corbett > Naish has just been locked in.  I hadn't considered Naish really at all this week but now is coming in out of necessity given there are absolutely 0 FWD rookies (already have Gardner).

Other 2 trades are still being thought about but will likely be Clark > DEF premo, Scott > Bewley/Hind.

[Samsturmfels]

Have gone: Clark, Hayes, Baker to Gardner, Clarke and Boak (99k in bank)

Would i be better off getting Brewley instead of Clarke?

Also at this current moment ill only have 17 playing after those trades. To fix this i could trade answerth instead of baker, howerver i would still be a few thousand short still for getting boak.

Trade Answerth instead of Baker to field 18

Grab Bewley or Hind instead of Clark, which allows you to still get Boak

ended up going answerth, clark, corbett to gardner, Clarke, Daniel. I was $100 short even if i went to brewley/hind to get boak which is highly disapointing. Will look to get Boak as my last fwd upgrade next week.