Round 3 Team Announcements

[kilbluff1985]

come on guys this threads not for discussions

[Rusty00]

Seriously, Darcy Moore affected? Cmon now let's not throw scare statements out there. Darcy Moore got 93 points last week almost purely off his defensive efforts. Out of every player in that Collingwood backline he was the one defender that was NOT involved in the chip to chip game. I traded him in last week so was watching closely, but if you don't want to take my word for it then the numbers do back me up.

Crisp [14 marks], Roughead [13], Howe [14], Aish [8], Langdon [9]. Then you had Sidey, Phillips and Mayne who all managed double digit marks as well. Brayden Maynard and Darcy Moore had 4 each, neither were involved. Moore had 9 kicks, Only Varcoe, Elliott and the ruckmen had less than him. Another thing that shows he's not involved.

So even if an Adams return pushes a midfielder onto the half back rotations (say Pendlebury), it should not have anything to do with Moore whose points were from him HTB free kicks, intercept marks, spoils etc, stuff that he does when the opposition has the ball.

Disclaimer: This does mean that Darcy Moore will continue to score 90+ every week, but saying he will drop because of the return of a midfielder to the team is a claim with zero evidence to back it up

I'm claiming you personally responsible if he doesn't ;)

[Jalapeno]

Seriously, Darcy Moore affected? Cmon now let's not throw scare statements out there. Darcy Moore got 93 points last week almost purely off his defensive efforts. Out of every player in that Collingwood backline he was the one defender that was NOT involved in the chip to chip game. I traded him in last week so was watching closely, but if you don't want to take my word for it then the numbers do back me up.

Crisp [14 marks], Roughead [13], Howe [14], Aish [8], Langdon [9]. Then you had Sidey, Phillips and Mayne who all managed double digit marks as well. Brayden Maynard and Darcy Moore had 4 each, neither were involved. Moore had 9 kicks, Only Varcoe, Elliott and the ruckmen had less than him. Another thing that shows he's not involved.

So even if an Adams return pushes a midfielder onto the half back rotations (say Pendlebury), it should not have anything to do with Moore whose points were from him HTB free kicks, intercept marks, spoils etc, stuff that he does when the opposition has the ball.

Disclaimer: This does mean that Darcy Moore will continue to score 90+ every week, but saying he will drop because of the return of a midfielder to the team is a claim with zero evidence to back it up

This is similar to what I was referring to above. Crisp may be affected in Pendles pushes back and becomes the link up player across HB. I know who's boot I would prefer it on out of Crisp and Pendles.

It was just food for thought. Not trying to argue or anything, or scare people off Crisp.

[Koop]

come on guys this threads not for discussions

it's a discussion forum kb you absolute helmet

[js19]

come on guys this threads not for discussions

it's a discussion forum kb you absolute helmet

It’s pretty self explanatory, regardless of any headwear fetish you may have - this is for TEAM ANNOUNCEMENTS.

Any discussions re roles, players positions etc can be discussed elsewhere. It’s a sticky so that you get just the ins and outs succinctly in one spot. Discussions means you have to search through the thread for relevant info...

[pyronerd]

come on guys this threads not for discussions

it's a discussion forum kb you absolute helmet

It’s pretty self explanatory, regardless of any headwear fetish you may have - this is for TEAM ANNOUNCEMENTS.

Any discussions re roles, players positions etc can be discussed elsewhere. It’s a sticky so that you get just the ins and outs succinctly in one spot. Discussions means you have to search through the thread for relevant info...

There is aboslutely no point in posting a thread with team announcements and not leaving leway for discussion, there are ample sources if all you want are the announcements themselves

[kilbluff1985]

yes  there is if ppl have discussions between announcements ppl wwill miss announcements and probs wont want to view the thread

[Ricochet]

Collingwood: If Taylor Adams gets through training on Thursday he'll play in Round 3 - Nathan Buckley via @WhateleySEN

Interesting who goes out?  Will it effect Moores points with sharing of points?

How will it affect Moore??

[tommy10]

It was just food for thought. Not trying to argue or anything, or scare people off Crisp.

In that case, yep it’s gonna “massively” affect Crisp  :P

[fanTCfool]

Collingwood: If Taylor Adams gets through training on Thursday he'll play in Round 3 - Nathan Buckley via @WhateleySEN

Interesting who goes out?  Will it effect Moores points with sharing of points?

How will it affect Moore??

When Taylor Adams plays CHB this week, don't say you weren't warned  ;)

[Ricochet]

AFL House @AFL_House

Round Three Teams:
ADE v GEEL

ADE
O’Brien in for Jacobs (injured).

GEE
Henderson in for Henry (injured).

[Ricochet]

Looks like no Hore for Melb.

Mitch Cleary on twitter

23 on the track for Melbourne’s Captains Run at Gosch’s Paddock. No Steven May (inj) or Tom Sparrow from last week’s side. Billy Stretch + Corey and Josh Wagner the others.

Expecting at least two changes. @AFLcomau

Nope. Hore, Sparrow, Preuss, Garlett, Lever and other listed players just arrived as the senior group left.

[PowerBug]

[HappyDEZ]

Lincoln (BRS) OUT. https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-04-04/inform-brisbane-recruit-injured-again-out-of-port-clash

[RaisyDaisy]

Richmond is set to pull a selection shock by naming rookie bolter Sydney Stack for his AFL debut against GWS.

Source: HS