Who to Field this round,

[tor01doc]

butters vs contstable

+1.

I think I will go with The Constable given his average and him having had a rest however his opposition is tougher.

Plus a higher high and a higher low

[Goosey]

butters vs contstable

+1.

I think I will go with The Constable given his average and him having had a rest however his opposition is tougher.

Plus a higher high and a higher low

Looping Butters with Setterfield on the mids bench. Will need at least 90 for me to not play Constable I reckon.

[erich1036]

LDU vs Duursma?

[Mat0369]

Can you loophole Duursma at all using someone? I think Duursma gives you at least 70 tonight, LDU has shown he can go larger

[erich1036]

Can you loophole Duursma at all using someone? I think Duursma gives you at least 70 tonight, LDU has shown he can go larger

Nah unfortunately not, only got Bailey Scott not playing who plays in the same game. Think I'll just play it 'safe' with Duursma...

[Money Shot]

Drew got 65ish tonight and I’m able to loophole him with Petrucelle. May as well... hopefully The Cult Hero doesn’t spud it up.

[Bully]

I've been tossing up bewteen Duursma & Collins all week but have decided to go Duursma. My reasoning? It makes tonight's game more interesting to watch.  ;D

I traded Collins but expecting him to clean up against our long bombs inside 50 aha

So you reckon Collins is the go?

Its a tough one. I cant see Duursma pulling a 40 or anything, but i think Collins has the scope to go much larger, especially this week. Duursma the safe bet.

Hmmm, I'm stumped on this one, probably should go for upside I guess, Collins it is.

84 for Duursma, reckon I've bungled this.

[tkringle]

I've been tossing up bewteen Duursma & Collins all week but have decided to go Duursma. My reasoning? It makes tonight's game more interesting to watch.  ;D

I traded Collins but expecting him to clean up against our long bombs inside 50 aha

So you reckon Collins is the go?

Its a tough one. I cant see Duursma pulling a 40 or anything, but i think Collins has the scope to go much larger, especially this week. Duursma the safe bet.

Hmmm, I'm stumped on this one, probably should go for upside I guess, Collins it is.

84 for Duursma, reckon I've bungled this.

I expect Collins to get about that so shouldn’t be a major difference

[Bully]

I've been tossing up bewteen Duursma & Collins all week but have decided to go Duursma. My reasoning? It makes tonight's game more interesting to watch.  ;D

I traded Collins but expecting him to clean up against our long bombs inside 50 aha

So you reckon Collins is the go?

Its a tough one. I cant see Duursma pulling a 40 or anything, but i think Collins has the scope to go much larger, especially this week. Duursma the safe bet.

Hmmm, I'm stumped on this one, probably should go for upside I guess, Collins it is.

84 for Duursma, reckon I've bungled this.

I expect Collins to get about that so shouldn’t be a major difference

Just as long as he doesn't throw up a 30, that would knock the mojo out of me.

[tkringle]

Drew got 65ish tonight and I’m able to loophole him with Petrucelle. May as well... hopefully The Cult Hero doesn’t spud it up.

Pet has only gotten more than Drew’s score once out of 5 attempts. Might stick with Drew’s 62. Especially against the Cats in Geelong.

[Ringo]

Drew got 65ish tonight and I’m able to loophole him with Petrucelle. May as well... hopefully The Cult Hero doesn’t spud it up.

Pet has only gotten more than Drew’s score once out of 5 attempts. Might stick with Drew’s 62. Especially against the Cats in Geelong.

Had the same decision with Bines C to take Gawns VC. Opted for e on Drew whilst not happy with Drews 62 at least he will still increase in  value given his -16 B/e, There will not be a real loss of points even Petra shines.

[Samsturmfels]

wilkie v scrimshaw

[tommy10]

wilkie v scrimshaw

Tough one but I’d back in scrimshaw against the Blues.

[Carn]

Take 63 or play Petruccelle?

[Mongoose528]

Take 63 or play Petruccelle?

63, without a doubt, Pet will find it tough against Geelong.