Correctional trades

[RaisyDaisy]

Dusty and Greene seem to be my only issues. Happy with all the rookies I have

Probably just need to wait for more news on Greene, but fair chance I punt both of them this week, then hoping I can just sit tight for a few weeks and let the cows moo

[Bully]

Dusty and Greene seem to be my only issues. Happy with all the rookies I have

Probably just need to wait for more news on Greene, but fair chance I punt both of them this week, then hoping I can just sit tight for a few weeks and let the cows moo

Heeney my only worry but will hold if I can, might just have to field Parker for a couple of weeks,

[_wato]

Now Parker is scoring well I'm more inclined to just hold Greene even if he was to miss another week as he's a perfect sub.

We all know how good Greene's scoring is. I still think he's a keeper and is priced awesome.

[Rusty00]

I’m so annoyed at myself that I had Boak in my team most of pre-season and then switched to Mundy a couple of days before the season started >:(

This one decision has killed the start of my season. Cost me 134 points and now will have to waste a trade on Mundy this week :'(

Rest of my team is quite solid and I'd obviously be in a much higher ranking :'(

[RaisyDaisy]

Heeney my only worry but will hold if I can, might just have to field Parker for a couple of weeks,

I'm not worried about Heeney - too good a player to not turn things around - Swans are 0-2 so Horse needs to put him back on the bal

Now Parker is scoring well I'm more inclined to just hold Greene even if he was to miss another week as he's a perfect sub.

We all know how good Greene's scoring is. I still think he's a keeper and is priced awesome.

Yeah I'm happy to hold Greene too, but at the same time there's a bunch of guys like Dahl, Worpel, Gresh and Caleb that are doing well and don't cost much more, so feel like it might be costly to pass on all of them just for Greene

Will need to think about it

[_wato]

Here are my two options

Dusty > Neale
Hore > Scrim

Crisp, ZWill, Smith, Scrim, Clark, Duursma (Wilkie, Burg)
Macrae, Fyfe, Neale, Cripps, Sloane, BRouch, Walsh, Constable (Butters, Scott, Atkins)

OR

Dusty > Whitfield
Hore > LDU

Whitfield, Crisp, ZWill, Smith, Clark, Duursma (Wilkie, Burg)
Macrae, Fyfe, Cripps, Sloane, BRouch, LDU, Walsh, Constable (Butters, Scott, Atkins)

So basically

Neale + Scrimshaw v Whitfield + LDU

[Bully]

Here are my two options

Dusty > Neale
Hore > Scrim

Crisp, ZWill, Smith, Scrim, Clark, Duursma (Wilkie, Burg)
Macrae, Fyfe, Neale, Cripps, Sloane, BRouch, Walsh, Constable (Butters, Scott, Atkins)

OR

Dusty > Whitfield
Hore > LDU

Whitfield, Crisp, ZWill, Smith, Clark, Duursma (Wilkie, Burg)
Macrae, Fyfe, Cripps, Sloane, BRouch, LDU, Walsh, Constable (Butters, Scott, Atkins)

So basically

Neale + Scrimshaw v Whitfield + LDU

Both look pretty good to me but my advice is to just wait on the teams, gut says Hore comes straight back in for May. Would love Scrimshaw myself but don't see the point if Hore is playing.

So probably go Dusty to Whitfield given he's a certain top 6 backman, Neale is also prone to stinkers & may also cop some attention from here. Brisbane cannot be taken lightly anymore.

[RaisyDaisy]

Neale Scrim for me

Whitfield has started well, but things should change once Kelly and Ward return. Should still be Top 6 def, but Neale will outscore him easily I would think

Scrim and LDU are cash cows, and Scrim being cheaper should earn a little quicker, but they're both good options - Scrim gets the nod because he comes with Neale

[_wato]

Don't see how Whitfield changes much when those 2 come back, he plays a completely different role

Scrim v LDU is completely different. One guy is a half back who plays in a very balance side, one bad performance he's goneski. Averaging 66 after 2 games, played very well today for a 79. LDU is playing on ball for North and attending a hell of a lot of stoppages. 80 and 118 are awesome scores for a rookie. Should appreciate much better than Scrim and the Whitfield option means I don't have journeyman Wilkie on field.

Neale is a gun don't get me wrong but the structure is what I'm trying to fix. Brisbane's run is good though, PA and Dons and then Pies- Zorko probably gets the Greenwood attention because he kills us. Then plays GC Swans and Dogs so don't see anyone slowing him down.

Whitfield (100) + LDU (80) v Neale (110) + Scrim (60) so it's a tough one.

Also re Hore he probably comes in but when May is back (don't even know what he's done) he probably gets dropped again. Dees seem like a revolving door at the moment until they work out what works. Getting embarrassed at the minute

[RaisyDaisy]

Don't see how Whitfield changes much when those 2 come back, he plays a completely different role

Scrim v LDU is completely different. One guy is a half back who plays in a very balance side, one bad performance he's goneski. Averaging 66 after 2 games, played very well today for a 79. LDU is playing on ball for North and attending a hell of a lot of stoppages. 80 and 118 are awesome scores for a rookie. Should appreciate much better than Scrim and the Whitfield option means I don't have journeyman Wilkie on field.

Neale is a gun don't get me wrong but the structure is what I'm trying to fix. Brisbane's run is good though, PA and Dons and then Pies- Zorko probably gets the Greenwood attention because he kills us. Then plays GC Swans and Dogs so don't see anyone slowing him down.

Whitfield (100) + LDU (80) v Neale (110) + Scrim (60) so it's a tough one.

Also re Hore he probably comes in but when May is back (don't even know what he's done) he probably gets dropped again. Dees seem like a revolving door at the moment until they work out what works. Getting embarrassed at the minute

Looks like Wilkie isn't on field in either option?

I've watched GWS and Whitfield is getting a lot of ball - Kelly and Ward will have some effect imo - like I said he is still a lock for Top 6 so not a bad pick at all, but I wouldn't be expecting 100+ scores every week once the others are back

What's the latest with Jed Anderson and Ben Jacobs? Not sure myself, but those two attend CBA's and could reduce LDU's numbers too

Either way, both options are solid so you can't really go wrong with either

[Mat0369]

Here are my two options

Dusty > Neale
Hore > Scrim

Crisp, ZWill, Smith, Scrim, Clark, Duursma (Wilkie, Burg)
Macrae, Fyfe, Neale, Cripps, Sloane, BRouch, Walsh, Constable (Butters, Scott, Atkins)

OR

Dusty > Whitfield
Hore > LDU

Whitfield, Crisp, ZWill, Smith, Clark, Duursma (Wilkie, Burg)
Macrae, Fyfe, Cripps, Sloane, BRouch, LDU, Walsh, Constable (Butters, Scott, Atkins)

So basically

Neale + Scrimshaw v Whitfield + LDU

I would go for LDU and Whitfield. I think LDU can generate more cash than Scrimshaw and that's essentially what you need in this trade. Both Whitfield and Neale are being picked as keepers. Look to try and grab Neale down the track.

[bkimm32]

All my rookies are right, I dont have any problems other than heeney really...

I'd usually hold premos but since im not using any other trades, heeney to Lloyd via Moore is my thoughts. Sydney's current game plan revolves heavily around Lloyd and not so much in favour of heeney, and whilst it's losing them games it's SuperCoach gold for one and shower for the other

Thoughts?

[Jalapeno]

For me this week it is:

Lyons to Sheed
Heeney to Lloyd

Thoughts?

[crowls]

did libba/ridley > worpel/wilkie last week.    too deep in mids and miss cash generation options.   strengthen fwds/defs due to poor rookie depth.      gutted essendon dropped ridley

seriously looking at heeney/bailey smith > lloyd/atkins,miers, or clark       probably last chance to get lloyd easily.     dont see how all cats rookies will keep getting games

[LaHug]

Guys, Lloyd has a BE of 98. He'll make $10k this week. He is not unobtainable going forward.