Correctional trades

[Money Shot]

Reckon I'll keep Greene

Frustrating as hell, but I  know how precious trades are and I can't burn them every time something goes wrong.

I knew he would miss games, but to trade him after just getting 1 game seems like an absolute waste. I'll just field Parker and cop the possible point loss, and hope Greene is back next week

Maybe I'm stubborn, but I want more than 1 bloody game from him lol

I’m also planning on holding him.

Hopefully he gets up next week but at this stage Parker looks good enough to fill the void.

[Ricochet]

Bit the bullet and traded Greene last week, this makes it worth it.

[Woppa15]

Reckon I'll keep Greene

Frustrating as hell, but I  know how precious trades are and I can't burn them every time something goes wrong.

I knew he would miss games, but to trade him after just getting 1 game seems like an absolute waste. I'll just field Parker and cop the possible point loss, and hope Greene is back next week

Maybe I'm stubborn, but I want more than 1 bloody game from him lol

I’m also planning on holding him.

Hopefully he gets up next week but at this stage Parker looks good enough to fill the void.

I agree with this somewhat. I knew at some stage he’d be missing a game or two but I certainly didn’t expect “General soreness” after 1 game. 1 game?????!!! And then for it to carry over for a second week. Sounds like porky pies to me!
I went stronger in the forwards with Greene @ F4. (Danger. Heeney. Boak. Greene.)
Going Greene > Rozee enables me to go Mills > Whitfield/Lloyd.

Forgot to mention also have Moore at D4.

[LaHug]

If I go Greene to Rozee, I can do any of the following...

Heeney to Lloyd/Whitfield (means I have all three of Rozee, Moore, Burgess forward - have to field Moore, Setterfield, Drew, Rozee, Parker with Petrucelle and Burgess on the bench but only have to field two of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins). First real upgrade would be to a forward and move one of them back but it'd be an ugly structure for now.

Heeney to Kelly/Boak (have to field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, better structure with Fwd/Def DPP across both lines, don't get Lloyd).

Witherden to Lloyd/Whitfield (have to field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, better structure with Fwd/Def DPP across both lines, have to keep Heeney who I'm very much doubting).

Witherden to Kelly/Boak (sends Moore to D3 behind Williams and Smith, still field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, have to keep Heeney who I'm very much doubting, don't get Lloyd).

Thoughts?

[imjusflexin]

I don't want to trade Heeney but I'm 5k short of Greene to Worpel, so he's the only other play on my team I'm at all comfortable trading out. So I think I'll go:

Heeney --> Kelly
Greene --> Worpel

Feels like shower doing two early sideways but I think I have to. Anyone have any concerns or doubts re: Worpel?

[LF]

Bit the bullet and traded Greene last week, this makes it worth it.

Was going to but instead used him to loop on Parkers score

[LaHug]

I don't want to trade Heeney but I'm 5k short of Greene to Worpel, so he's the only other play on my team I'm at all comfortable trading out. So I think I'll go:

Heeney --> Kelly
Greene --> Worpel

Feels like shower doing two early sideways but I think I have to. Anyone have any concerns or doubts re: Worpel?

I really like Worpel so that's probably a good move.

[LaHug]

If I go Greene to Rozee, I can do any of the following...

Heeney to Lloyd/Whitfield (means I have all three of Rozee, Moore, Burgess forward - have to field Moore, Setterfield, Drew, Rozee, Parker with Petrucelle and Burgess on the bench but only have to field two of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins). First real upgrade would be to a forward and move one of them back but it'd be an ugly structure for now.

Heeney to Kelly/Boak (have to field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, better structure with Fwd/Def DPP across both lines, don't get Lloyd).

Witherden to Lloyd/Whitfield (have to field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, better structure with Fwd/Def DPP across both lines, have to keep Heeney who I'm very much doubting).

Witherden to Kelly/Boak (sends Moore to D3 behind Williams and Smith, still field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, have to keep Heeney who I'm very much doubting, don't get Lloyd).

Thoughts?

Any thoughts on these four options? I can also go Heeney and Greene to Boak and Worpel but can't afford Kelly in that one... The other ones are more likely to get me a bonafide keeper

[GoLions]

If I go Greene to Rozee, I can do any of the following...

Heeney to Lloyd/Whitfield (means I have all three of Rozee, Moore, Burgess forward - have to field Moore, Setterfield, Drew, Rozee, Parker with Petrucelle and Burgess on the bench but only have to field two of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins). First real upgrade would be to a forward and move one of them back but it'd be an ugly structure for now.

Heeney to Kelly/Boak (have to field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, better structure with Fwd/Def DPP across both lines, don't get Lloyd).

Witherden to Lloyd/Whitfield (have to field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, better structure with Fwd/Def DPP across both lines, have to keep Heeney who I'm very much doubting).

Witherden to Kelly/Boak (sends Moore to D3 behind Williams and Smith, still field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, have to keep Heeney who I'm very much doubting, don't get Lloyd).

Thoughts?

Any thoughts on these four options? I can also go Heeney and Greene to Boak and Worpel but can't afford Kelly in that one... The other ones are more likely to get me a bonafide keeper

Personally I'd hold off on the 2nd trade for now, but if you were set on using it then I'd look at getting Lloyd in, so 1 or 3

[jfitty]

If I go Greene to Rozee, I can do any of the following...

Heeney to Lloyd/Whitfield (means I have all three of Rozee, Moore, Burgess forward - have to field Moore, Setterfield, Drew, Rozee, Parker with Petrucelle and Burgess on the bench but only have to field two of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins). First real upgrade would be to a forward and move one of them back but it'd be an ugly structure for now.

Heeney to Kelly/Boak (have to field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, better structure with Fwd/Def DPP across both lines, don't get Lloyd).

Witherden to Lloyd/Whitfield (have to field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, better structure with Fwd/Def DPP across both lines, have to keep Heeney who I'm very much doubting).

Witherden to Kelly/Boak (sends Moore to D3 behind Williams and Smith, still field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, have to keep Heeney who I'm very much doubting, don't get Lloyd).

Thoughts?

Any thoughts on these four options? I can also go Heeney and Greene to Boak and Worpel but can't afford Kelly in that one... The other ones are more likely to get me a bonafide keeper

I'm considering the Heeney/Greene to Boak/Worpel move myself.. Feels so wrong though

[Sabretooth Tigers]

 :-\

This week is ball-biter!  May even settle on Mundy out for Parker.  And a little out of left field, going Dusty to Gaff. Gives me $456,000 fpr  the best player I've missed over the next 5 to 6 weeks, whilst some of the cash cows fatten up. Don't have patience with Mundy and very disappointed in what I've seen of Dusty and Richmond's efforts so far.

:'(

[enzedder]

Bit the bullet and traded Greene last week, this makes it worth it.

Was going to but instead used him to loop on Parkers score

Me too.
Still holding him.
Can loop Setterfield into Petruccelle this week if need be.

[Hazza09]

If I go Greene to Rozee, I can do any of the following...

Heeney to Lloyd/Whitfield (means I have all three of Rozee, Moore, Burgess forward - have to field Moore, Setterfield, Drew, Rozee, Parker with Petrucelle and Burgess on the bench but only have to field two of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins). First real upgrade would be to a forward and move one of them back but it'd be an ugly structure for now.

Heeney to Kelly/Boak (have to field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, better structure with Fwd/Def DPP across both lines, don't get Lloyd).

Witherden to Lloyd/Whitfield (have to field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, better structure with Fwd/Def DPP across both lines, have to keep Heeney who I'm very much doubting).

Witherden to Kelly/Boak (sends Moore to D3 behind Williams and Smith, still field three of Clark, Duursma, Scrimshaw, Collins, get to keep Setterfield or Parker benched, have to keep Heeney who I'm very much doubting, don't get Lloyd).

Thoughts?

Any thoughts on these four options? I can also go Heeney and Greene to Boak and Worpel but can't afford Kelly in that one... The other ones are more likely to get me a bonafide keeper

I'm considering the Heeney/Greene to Boak/Worpel move myself.. Feels so wrong though

This is also a trade which is on the cards for me too...so im not the only one thinking this!! Looks great on paper but something just doesnt feel right about it!

[imjusflexin]

Can someone talk me out of wasting two trades to ditch Greene.. I'm 10k short of Worpel so need to jump off someone else, and Heeney & Merrett are my only two choices.

Here are my options:

Merrett --> Rockliff (the only mid under 530k that I would want)
Greene --> T. Kelly (smart move but will mean my top 4 forwards all have the same bye which is why I didn't select Kelly to start with, and I don't trust Boak)

OR

Heeney --> T. Kelly
Greene --> Worpel (are we sure he's gonna keep this up?)

OR

Hold Greene and play both Setterfield & Parker on field.

I think at this point however the chance that Greene is just a bust (constantly in & out of team, not 100% healthy until finals) is very high and I don't wanna be stuck with him while the only comparably priced player (Worpel) gets too expensive.

Someone tell me what to do.

[oh_lol]

I like your first option. I have faith in Heeney, Merrett none at all.