Correctional trades

Started by tor01doc, March 24, 2019, 06:01:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Money Shot

I also have Balta and Greene.

I’m holding Greene.

Balta I am unsure on...

Parker looks the pick of the bunch but I am worried that Brander, Schultz or Miers could come out with a really big score this week and Parker has a stinker.

I’m tempted to just wait and see and if I lose 30 points or so fielding Petrucelle over Parker so be it.

PowerBug

Who would you prioritise getting in between Wilkie, Parker, Atkins and Darcy Moore? Is it worth grabbing two of them this week? I have the flexibility and cash to be able to jump on any of these guys from Balta.
Leader of the King Karl Amon fan club
Coach of WXV side Rio De Janeiro Jaguars
2023 SC: Rank 126

LaHug

The fact that we can use Greene to loophole Parker (what's the line though...? 50, 60?) against Petrucelle makes me comfortable doing the trade now.

Money Shot

Quote from: PowerBug on March 28, 2019, 09:53:06 AM
Who would you prioritise getting in between Wilkie, Parker, Atkins and Darcy Moore? Is it worth grabbing two of them this week? I have the flexibility and cash to be able to jump on any of these guys from Balta.
Parker, Atkins then Wilkie but that order could be different in a few days time.

Money Shot

Quote from: LaHug on March 28, 2019, 09:55:23 AM
The fact that we can use Greene to loophole Parker (what's the line though...? 50, 60?) against Petrucelle makes me comfortable doing the trade now.
60 I think

ubeaut

Quote from: jfitty on March 28, 2019, 09:34:59 AM
I'm really stuck this week..

Already have Parker, and having to cop Balta, Greene and possibly Collins out..

My best option would be Balta out, Drew forward, then bring in a mid rookie, but already have Atkins, Gibbons and Scott (Constable on field with Drew).

Could also swing some DPP and get Joyce/Wilkie, but concerned on their JS? Maybe if one makes way for Nathan Brown it'll be a more obvious selection..

Ugh!
Balta > Butters let's u field all of Constable, Drew and Scott. Drew needs to be in the fwd line given scoring ability of most fwd rookies.

Mat0369

For those that have Grundy, what do you see as a trade score vs a hold score?

JonnyJJJJ

Quote from: Mat0369 on March 28, 2019, 12:24:53 PM
For those that have Grundy, what do you see as a trade score vs a hold score?
0-200 hold

jfitty

Quote from: ubeaut on March 28, 2019, 10:42:29 AM
Quote from: jfitty on March 28, 2019, 09:34:59 AM
I'm really stuck this week..

Already have Parker, and having to cop Balta, Greene and possibly Collins out..

My best option would be Balta out, Drew forward, then bring in a mid rookie, but already have Atkins, Gibbons and Scott (Constable on field with Drew).

Could also swing some DPP and get Joyce/Wilkie, but concerned on their JS? Maybe if one makes way for Nathan Brown it'll be a more obvious selection..

Ugh!
Balta > Butters let's u field all of Constable, Drew and Scott. Drew needs to be in the fwd line given scoring ability of most fwd rookies.

That's the idea scenario, just don't have the cash in the bank for it (unless I trade Collins)

Money Shot

Quote from: Mat0369 on March 28, 2019, 12:24:53 PM
For those that have Grundy, what do you see as a trade score vs a hold score?
If he scores under 100 I would consider trading him down to Mumford. I really hope he scores well though because I don’t really love the idea.

HappyDEZ

Quote from: Mat0369 on March 28, 2019, 12:24:53 PM
For those that have Grundy, what do you see as a trade score vs a hold score?
Barring injury I am holding. Although a low or sub 80 would be disturbing. I am worried about that foot too. We seen with Pendles yet another example of a lingering problem being kept under wraps by a club. That's not to say a sideways/downgrade trade is a bad move. I am thinking Angus to Rocky but mainly because I have no cash to get any of my low scoring rookies to Scott. My tight arse bench & no bank balance has burnt me on this occasion & if Scott goes 80+ he is just about a must have for cash generation + Rocky should generate too.

Mat0369

So if he puts up an awkward 105 against Nank who traditionally bleeds points you're content? I think if he scores sub 100 most will make the move. I'm curious to see what happens in the 100-105 range.

ubeaut

Quote from: Mat0369 on March 28, 2019, 12:24:53 PM
For those that have Grundy, what do you see as a trade score vs a hold score?
Depends on how he looks as well, but anything under 100 is not a good sign given how Nank leaks points to oppo rucks.

quinny88

Who do I trade Balta to when I already have Moore, Setterfield, Drew and Parker?
Just hold?

Mat0369

Quote from: quinny88 on March 28, 2019, 01:08:53 PM
Who do I trade Balta to when I already have Moore, Setterfield, Drew and Parker?
Just hold?

Hold. Unless you have someone you can swing forward and grab Duursma down back. I'd rather wait a week before making a call with Balta to be honest. Can see the best option and assese at least