structure vs structure

[kilbluff1985]

just showing this to show why i think 3 mid rookies on field works best

i atleast much prefer the 2nd team

now you could go Roberton to Collins then get Walsh in etc but u get the idea

[crowls]

couple of interesting teams kb.  prefer team 1

[TommyC]

couple of interesting teams kb.  prefer team 1

+1

[Holz]

certainly prefer team 1.Sticking in a beast like Zerrett over these meh solid but not premo guys in Worpel Smith certainly looks the way to go.

If you could do Logue to Quaynor and then Rozee to Walsh via moving drew forward then the team would look amazing.

[kilbluff1985]

i like 2nd team because i think Smith/Worpel both can go 90+ and McHenry will outscore Rozee/Logue/Quaynor etc

[Holz]

i like 2nd team because i think Smith/Worpel both can go 90+ and McHenry will outscore Rozee/Logue/Quaynor etc

if you think Mchnery will outscore Rozee then why didnt you pick him in option 1. You could do that and then have 50k in the bank.

If you feel Smith will go 90+ (good luck with that)

then why dont you drop LLoyd down to Smith in option 1, turn Rozee into Mchenry and then turn Burges into Worpel.

[kilbluff1985]

because option 1 is a common structure not a team im going with

was posting this to show ppl the differences