Player X vs Player Y - 2019

Started by PassivePenguin, December 23, 2018, 11:44:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

frenzy

Quote from: Holz on April 03, 2019, 09:55:31 AM
going to struggle with the one all week

Macrae + Parker + 150k in the bank

LDU + Kelly + 250k in the bank

Macrae and Parker, Maca another good capt option + Parker will make good cash

HappyDEZ

Quote from: Holz on April 03, 2019, 11:07:16 AM
Quote from: HappyDEZ on April 03, 2019, 10:58:05 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on April 03, 2019, 10:12:11 AM
Quote from: Holz on April 03, 2019, 09:55:31 AM
going to struggle with the one all week

Macrae + Parker + 150k in the bank

LDU + Kelly + 250k in the bank

man that is a tough decision.
both options have keepers in their positions and have plenty of money to make too.
I'd go option A, more points from your keeper and slightly more money from your cash cow
I like Option A too. Only because I think GWS admitted the other day that they have some work to do in the medical/player management space & may err on the side of caution until they catch up a little.

Sorry i should have stated it Tim Kelly the FWD
Oh. I still like option A. Like someone else typed Macrae is a C option. In fact if I had him it would def be Danger into Macrae this week + Parker looks set to make good money. I reckon he might enjoy the hard expanses of Optus for another 70+ against Freo hopefully.

ubeaut

Quote from: Holz on April 03, 2019, 09:55:31 AM
going to struggle with the one all week

Macrae + Parker + 150k in the bank

LDU + Kelly + 250k in the bank
It's so close, maybe team structure should decide your answer, and what rookies would be fielded in each scenario.

_wato

Whitfield + LDU v Neale + Rozee

Mid and Defender positions

ubeaut

Quote from: _wato on April 03, 2019, 03:41:04 PM
Whitfield + LDU v Neale + Rozee

Mid and Defender positions
Again it depends on structure and what rookies are fielded.
Can LDU keep up the scoring? If so option 1 could be better in terms of both cash gen and scoring.
On the other hand he could drop off, and option 2 nets u more points, with maybe slightly less cash gen(depending on Rozee)

I think Neale will beast it this year, and will be harder to get in than Whitfield down the track. So option 2 for me, just.

_wato

#815
Quote from: ubeaut on April 03, 2019, 03:56:54 PM
Quote from: _wato on April 03, 2019, 03:41:04 PM
Whitfield + LDU v Neale + Rozee

Mid and Defender positions
Again it depends on structure and what rookies are fielded.
Can LDU keep up the scoring? If so option 1 could be better in terms of both cash gen and scoring.
On the other hand he could drop off, and option 2 nets u more points, with maybe slightly less cash gen(depending on Rozee)

I think Neale will beast it this year, and will be harder to get in than Whitfield down the track. So option 2 for me, just.

Exact two rookies as named. Rozee fills D4, Neale M3 or Whitfield D1, LDU M7

I agree with you 100%. Rozee probably not as safe but a 68 and 85 is still good scoring for a rookie and Neale outscores Whitfield by 10ppg+

Comes down to what LDU produces. I think he's primed and has a depleted Hawks midfield to play against this week. The 118 will be huge in his rolling average.

Other option I could do and follow the pack

Newman + Rockliff over other 2 options.

Mongoose528

Dusty -> LDU + Greene -> Boak/Worpel/Kelly (Any forward)

Vs

Dusty -> Lloyd via Duursma.

crowls

Quote from: Mongoose528 on April 03, 2019, 09:03:05 PM
Dusty -> LDU + Greene -> Boak/Worpel/Kelly (Any forward)

Vs

Dusty -> Lloyd via Duursma.
option 1 for me.    think green will be managed throughout the year.

Wanderer

Mills doesn't look like he will get mid time so want to offload him. I already have Lloyd, Williams, Smith. I can afford any defender.

Laird vs Whitfield vs Crisp vs anybody else

Or should I trade down to one of the rookies I don't have, Scrimshaw or Collins?


crowls

Quote from: Wanderer on April 03, 2019, 11:52:11 PM
Mills doesn't look like he will get mid time so want to offload him. I already have Lloyd, Williams, Smith. I can afford any defender.

Laird vs Whitfield vs Crisp vs anybody else

Or should I trade down to one of the rookies I don't have, Scrimshaw or Collins?
whitfield or crisp for me.  laird still needs watching.   more important to have mid rookies correct,  dont see scrim or collins as must haves

LaHug

Quote from: crowls on April 04, 2019, 06:22:16 AM
Quote from: Wanderer on April 03, 2019, 11:52:11 PM
Mills doesn't look like he will get mid time so want to offload him. I already have Lloyd, Williams, Smith. I can afford any defender.

Laird vs Whitfield vs Crisp vs anybody else

Or should I trade down to one of the rookies I don't have, Scrimshaw or Collins?
whitfield or crisp for me.  laird still needs watching.   more important to have mid rookies correct,  dont see scrim or collins as must haves

Whitfield is better than Crisp imo. They got smashed last week with Hutchings tagging Cogs over Whitfield (something I never thought would happen) and Whitfield scored 123. They now play the Tigers this week (the team that let Crisp score so much) at home. Whitfield will keep going big and won't get tagged going forward. Reckon he'll compete with Lloyd for best defender by year's end.

miamis_finest

Devon Dmith > Tim Kelly
Or
Heeney > Tim Kelly
Or
No trade

LaHug

Quote from: miamis_finest on April 04, 2019, 12:50:07 PM
Devon Dmith > Tim Kelly
Or
Heeney > Tim Kelly
Or
No trade

I'd trade Heeney out before I traded Smith. Heeney looks unfit, Smith's just playing with a team that doesn't care. Bombers should bounce back eventually and Smith will with them.

Gambino

Boak

v

Worpel + 80k in the bank

HappyDEZ

Quote from: Gambino on April 04, 2019, 01:30:32 PM
Boak

v

Worpel + 80k in the bank
Tough one. Personally I prefer Boak but I don't think you can go too far wrong with Worpel.