Player X vs Player Y - 2019

Started by PassivePenguin, December 23, 2018, 11:44:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

SilverLion

Quote from: jvalles69 on March 01, 2019, 12:28:41 PM
Zerrett vs Sloane

Will these guys really be that far apart in scoring?  Sloane has multiple years of 100+ SC scoring, has the tag moved onto M. Crouch now?  Thinking I can save some money for relatively the same thing here.
Zerrett. Sloane still too easily tagged and too inconsistent imo.

jvalles69

Quote from: SilverLion on March 01, 2019, 12:29:30 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 01, 2019, 12:28:41 PM
Zerrett vs Sloane

Will these guys really be that far apart in scoring?  Sloane has multiple years of 100+ SC scoring, has the tag moved onto M. Crouch now?  Thinking I can save some money for relatively the same thing here.
Zerrett. Sloane still too easily tagged and too inconsistent imo.

Think I'm going to avoid both and have a 5th uber premium out of Macrae vs Oliver.  Macrae's ceiling is hard to ignore, Oliver's is pretty good too.  Will leave me with a mid line of Cripps, Macrae/Oliver, Fyfe, Neale, Dusty.

hawkers65

Quote from: SilverLion on March 01, 2019, 12:29:30 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 01, 2019, 12:28:41 PM
Zerrett vs Sloane

Will these guys really be that far apart in scoring?  Sloane has multiple years of 100+ SC scoring, has the tag moved onto M. Crouch now?  Thinking I can save some money for relatively the same thing here.
Zerrett. Sloane still too easily tagged and too inconsistent imo.

I cant split them so i'm taking both

Woppa15

I don’t understand the attraction to Matt Crouch. Yeah he gets a lot of contested ball and yeah he may be overpriced but the years I’ve had him and watched pretty closely he needs to get huge possession numbers to even go 105+

Maybe I’ve just got M Crouch PTSD.....

hawkers65

Quote from: Woppa15 on March 01, 2019, 02:26:54 PM
I don’t understand the attraction to Matt Crouch. Yeah he gets a lot of contested ball and yeah he may be overpriced but the years I’ve had him and watched pretty closely he needs to get huge possession numbers to even go 105+

Maybe I’ve just got M Crouch PTSD.....

I agree, like look at last year 41, 36, 38 and 40 touches for 105, 106, 101 and 112...? Thats fkn yuck. Just a frustrating pick

HappyDEZ

Quote from: hawkers65 on March 01, 2019, 02:29:45 PM
Quote from: Woppa15 on March 01, 2019, 02:26:54 PM
I don’t understand the attraction to Matt Crouch. Yeah he gets a lot of contested ball and yeah he may be overpriced but the years I’ve had him and watched pretty closely he needs to get huge possession numbers to even go 105+

Maybe I’ve just got M Crouch PTSD.....

I agree, like look at last year 41, 36, 38 and 40 touches for 105, 106, 101 and 112...? Thats fkn yuck. Just a frustrating pick
Did go 109.9 post bye last year. I think he can go around that mark in 2019. That puts him right on the fringe of the top 8 MIDS in the comp (not counting Danger) so I can see why people have got him seeing he is ranked 27th MID in price (once again not counting Danger). I only have him AF & RDT atm but I wouldn't mind him in my SC side.

_wato

The reason you pick Matt Crouch is the fact that post bye 2017 until now he has scored

132, 131, 116, 104, 134, 120, 139, 139, 91, 146, 126, 119, 125, 105, 51 (injured 5 mins into the second quarter), 100, 122, 92, 100, 106, 68, 95, 126, 101, 85, 112, 112, 127, 107, 131, 88

Excluding the injury game he has 24/30 100+ games, five scores between 85 and 95 (95, 92, 91, 88, 85) and only one real stinker of 68.

Absolute model of consistency. Average of 113 over his past 30 games. And he's priced at 100.

Also the injury definitely impeded his season. Would've gone 130+ in Round 2, so would've been on track for an easy 110+ year and hence priced at 600k plus.

hawkers65

Quote from: _wato on March 01, 2019, 04:49:06 PM
The reason you pick Matt Crouch is the fact that post bye 2017 until now he has scored

132, 131, 116, 104, 134, 120, 139, 139, 91, 146, 126, 119, 125, 105, 51 (injured 5 mins into the second quarter), 100, 122, 92, 100, 106, 68, 95, 126, 101, 85, 112, 112, 127, 107, 131, 88

Excluding the injury game he has 24/30 100+ games, five scores between 85 and 95 (95, 92, 91, 88, 85) and only one real stinker of 68.

Absolute model of consistency. Average of 113 over his past 30 games. And he's priced at 100.

Also the injury definitely impeded his season. Would've gone 130+ in Round 2, so would've been on track for an easy 110+ year and hence priced at 600k plus.

I cant justify spending extra money on M.Crouch when Sloane is there cheaper. Just so many eh scores for a mid premium

dmac07

J.Elliot vs J.Daniher vs D.Moore vs S.Weideman

jvalles69

Quote from: dmac07 on March 01, 2019, 08:02:35 PM
J.Elliot vs J.Daniher vs D.Moore vs S.Weideman

Gross x 4. Go with a rookie instead.

crowls


Sabretooth Tigers

Quote from: crowls on March 01, 2019, 11:08:27 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 01, 2019, 10:58:00 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 01, 2019, 08:02:35 PM
J.Elliot vs J.Daniher vs D.Moore vs S.Weideman

Gross x 4. Go with a rookie instead.
this.   

Agree with this, but if I had to pick one I'd go with Daniher.

D Roberton  +  R Sloane    V    L Ryan  +  A Miles  On SCGold projected scores for Rd.1 it is  156  v  192 but that's only Rd.1 and ?   

Ricochet

Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 02, 2019, 03:24:40 AM
Quote from: crowls on March 01, 2019, 11:08:27 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 01, 2019, 10:58:00 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 01, 2019, 08:02:35 PM
J.Elliot vs J.Daniher vs D.Moore vs S.Weideman

Gross x 4. Go with a rookie instead.
this.   

Agree with this, but if I had to pick one I'd go with Daniher.

D Roberton  +  R Sloane    V    L Ryan  +  A Miles  On SCGold projected scores for Rd.1 it is  156  v  192 but that's only Rd.1 and ?   
Sloane and Roberton

Best case you get two keepers. And at very least Roberton will make a bit of cash for you

RaisyDaisy

SC Gold Predictions are absolute rubbish - don't consider them

Anyone can look over a few previous scores and make an assumption, because that's all they are

frenzy

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 03, 2019, 10:51:42 AM
SC Gold Predictions are absolute rubbish - don't consider them

Anyone can look over a few previous scores and make an assumption, because that's all they are

???