Player X vs Player Y - 2019

Started by PassivePenguin, December 23, 2018, 11:44:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

quinny88

Quote from: ben_020285 on February 21, 2019, 12:46:26 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on February 20, 2019, 11:56:55 PM
Quote from: TableKing on February 17, 2019, 04:26:40 PM
Tossing up Worpel v Merritt
Player for player im sure all agree Merritt is well established and proven. Reason i have put it up...Worpel has been killing it in training and he will be having increased Mid minutes.
Merritt is a gun but when tagged can go missing. Not sure if Shiel coming over will make a difference. I would still expect the tag to head to Merritt.

Anyways they are my thoughts...would love to know yours

Merret by an absolute mile.

I can't understand the Worpel hype at all. The kids played 12 games. Getting extra midfield time won't automatically turn him into a premium. Will average 90 at absolute best where as Merrett will average 100 at worst

The same could be said about Oliver at the start of 2017.

It’s rare that a player does it in his second year but the scene is set for Worpel as the way he plays suits SC plus obviously the injury to Mitchell helps a great deal.

Not expecting a 110 average like Clarry the GOAT did in his second year but I can see him going 95+

I suppose Oliver did do something very few have ever done in their 2nd season but the chances of Worpel doing it are very very slim. 95 is fair but stil doesn't compare to Merrett who should go 105-115. They shouldn't really be compared anyway though as you would only ever pick Worpel as a forward

quinny88

Worpel was also just about worst on ground in both finals and scored 37 and 54 to go with a 33 and 32 in 2 of his other 9 games. It's asking a hell of a lot for him to even go 90. I just don't see it

ben_020285

Quote from: quinny88 on February 21, 2019, 02:38:08 AM
Quote from: ben_020285 on February 21, 2019, 12:46:26 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on February 20, 2019, 11:56:55 PM
Quote from: TableKing on February 17, 2019, 04:26:40 PM
Tossing up Worpel v Merritt
Player for player im sure all agree Merritt is well established and proven. Reason i have put it up...Worpel has been killing it in training and he will be having increased Mid minutes.
Merritt is a gun but when tagged can go missing. Not sure if Shiel coming over will make a difference. I would still expect the tag to head to Merritt.

Anyways they are my thoughts...would love to know yours

Merret by an absolute mile.

I can't understand the Worpel hype at all. The kids played 12 games. Getting extra midfield time won't automatically turn him into a premium. Will average 90 at absolute best where as Merrett will average 100 at worst

The same could be said about Oliver at the start of 2017.

It’s rare that a player does it in his second year but the scene is set for Worpel as the way he plays suits SC plus obviously the injury to Mitchell helps a great deal.

Not expecting a 110 average like Clarry the GOAT did in his second year but I can see him going 95+

I suppose Oliver did do something very few have ever done in their 2nd season but the chances of Worpel doing it are very very slim. 95 is fair but stil doesn't compare to Merrett who should go 105-115. They shouldn't really be compared anyway though as you would only ever pick Worpel as a forward

Yeah not trying to compare them at all. I’m just saying I think that Worpel could be a good pick.

TommyC

Quote from: quinny88 on February 21, 2019, 02:43:59 AM
Worpel was also just about worst on ground in both finals and scored 37 and 54 to go with a 33 and 32 in 2 of his other 9 games. It's asking a hell of a lot for him to even go 90. I just don't see it
This.
Maybe in a few years he will, but not just yet.

js19

Fork out for top talent, or load up on value/keepers?

Lloyd, Laird, Macrae, Walsh and English

vs

Ryan, Mills, Zorko, Walters and Goldy

Keeper27

Quote from: js19 on February 23, 2019, 04:31:32 AM
Fork out for top talent, or load up on value/keepers?

Lloyd, Laird, Macrae, Walsh and English

vs

Ryan, Mills, Zorko, Walters and Goldy

B

GoldDigger


Ricochet

Quote from: GoldDigger on February 23, 2019, 06:11:56 PM
Sicily or Simpson?
I'd go Sicily personally, but can't go wrong with either mate

SilverLion

Quote from: GoldDigger on February 23, 2019, 06:11:56 PM
Sicily or Simpson?
Simpson has consistency and longevity, Sicily has upside and the potential for more higher games. I'd go Simpson only because he should play more games out of the two.




Witherden vs. Whitfield, ignore price difference

GoldDigger

Quote from: SilverLion on February 23, 2019, 06:14:41 PM




Witherden vs. Whitfield, ignore price difference
Whitfield for mine, longer in the system and proven elite performance.

crowls

Quote from: GoldDigger on February 23, 2019, 06:22:10 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on February 23, 2019, 06:14:41 PM




Witherden vs. Whitfield, ignore price difference
Whitfield for mine, longer in the system and proven elite performance.
this

Colley Dogs


crowls

Both.   Flip of coin for me.  First team had both, then I traded crouch down to Mundy for a cash grab.

tommy10


jvalles69

Zerrett vs Sloane

Will these guys really be that far apart in scoring?  Sloane has multiple years of 100+ SC scoring, has the tag moved onto M. Crouch now?  Thinking I can save some money for relatively the same thing here.