Mid Price Options 2019

[SilverLion]

Cousins looks alright and should get games, but he just scraped over 100 in a side that literally had not a single best 22 hawk mid in it, so once they all return I don't think he will be scoring as much ;)

You can tell I went and checked, Lol. But Sicily says Hi.  ;D

That was my immediate reaction but after re-reading RD’s post he does say best 22 hawk mid ;)

;)

Harsh on Worpel.

[RaisyDaisy]

Cousins looks alright and should get games, but he just scraped over 100 in a side that literally had not a single best 22 hawk mid in it, so once they all return I don't think he will be scoring as much ;)

You can tell I went and checked, Lol. But Sicily says Hi.  ;D

That was my immediate reaction but after re-reading RD’s post he does say best 22 hawk mid ;)

;)

Harsh on Worpel.

I was waiting for someone to mention him :P

You get the point though - There was literally two best 22 Hawks (Sicily and Worp) and that is it. Not sure Cousins gets as much pill when the cavalry returns

[frenzy]

Cousins looks alright and should get games, but he just scraped over 100 in a side that literally had not a single best 22 hawk mid in it, so once they all return I don't think he will be scoring as much ;)

You can tell I went and checked, Lol. But Sicily says Hi.  ;D

That was my immediate reaction but after re-reading RD’s post he does say best 22 hawk mid ;)

;)

Harsh on Worpel.

I was waiting for someone to mention him :P

You get the point though - There was literally two best 22 Hawks (Sicily and Worp) and that is it. Not sure Cousins gets as much pill when the cavalry returns

maybe he gets less attention and let off the hook. Not sure we can read anything into the team put out there.

[Mat0369]

Cousins isn't all that much more than Walsh. I wouldn't really chuck him into mid price territory. You're basically picking him as an expensive rookie and from everything he has shown through the pre-season (practice game against us with O'Meara playing) he seems like he could be a ball winner for them and decent option to generate cash.

[SilverLion]

Cousins looks alright and should get games, but he just scraped over 100 in a side that literally had not a single best 22 hawk mid in it, so once they all return I don't think he will be scoring as much ;)

You can tell I went and checked, Lol. But Sicily says Hi.  ;D

That was my immediate reaction but after re-reading RD’s post he does say best 22 hawk mid ;)

;)

Harsh on Worpel.

I was waiting for someone to mention him :P

You get the point though - There was literally two best 22 Hawks (Sicily and Worp) and that is it. Not sure Cousins gets as much pill when the cavalry returns

Agreed, but at his price he only needs a 70ish average to justify the pick, which is possible, and a spot is definitely up for grabs.

Also harsh on Impey haha

[RaisyDaisy]

Cousins looks alright and should get games, but he just scraped over 100 in a side that literally had not a single best 22 hawk mid in it, so once they all return I don't think he will be scoring as much ;)

You can tell I went and checked, Lol. But Sicily says Hi.  ;D

That was my immediate reaction but after re-reading RD’s post he does say best 22 hawk mid ;)

;)

Harsh on Worpel.

I was waiting for someone to mention him :P

You get the point though - There was literally two best 22 Hawks (Sicily and Worp) and that is it. Not sure Cousins gets as much pill when the cavalry returns

Agreed, but at his price he only needs a 70ish average to justify the pick, which is possible, and a spot is definitely up for grabs.

Also harsh on Impey haha

If Cousins averages 70, you'd be lucky to make 80k by the byes

David Swallow averaged 80 in his debut season - He averaged 81 over his first 7 games and went up 130k or there abouts. He started at 189k

Cousins at 219k and a 70 avg would be woeful, which is why I've all but ruled him out.

As per the Swallow comparison you need them to go 80+ to make coin, and that's possible for Walsh making him the only guy in that price range I would consider. After Walsh, it's down to Butters/Caldwell/Hately imo. LDU I can't see going 80 so he's out too

Anyway, they're all rookies and this is Mid Price talk, so I'll get things back on track  ;D

I hate every other forward besides Danger and Heeney, so I'm going YOLO and Greene is my F3 now. Feels good not having to waste anymore time trying to figure out who to make F3

[SilverLion]

Cousins looks alright and should get games, but he just scraped over 100 in a side that literally had not a single best 22 hawk mid in it, so once they all return I don't think he will be scoring as much ;)

You can tell I went and checked, Lol. But Sicily says Hi.  ;D

That was my immediate reaction but after re-reading RD’s post he does say best 22 hawk mid ;)

;)

Harsh on Worpel.

I was waiting for someone to mention him :P

You get the point though - There was literally two best 22 Hawks (Sicily and Worp) and that is it. Not sure Cousins gets as much pill when the cavalry returns

Agreed, but at his price he only needs a 70ish average to justify the pick, which is possible, and a spot is definitely up for grabs.

Also harsh on Impey haha

If Cousins averages 70, you'd be lucky to make 80k by the byes

David Swallow averaged 80 in his debut season - He averaged 81 over his first 7 games and went up 130k or there abouts. He started at 189k

Cousins at 219k and a 70 avg would be woeful, which is why I've all but ruled him out.

As per the Swallow comparison you need them to go 80+ to make coin, and that's possible for Walsh making him the only guy in that price range I would consider. After Walsh, it's down to Butters/Caldwell/Hately imo. LDU I can't see going 80 so he's out too

Anyway, they're all rookies and this is Mid Price talk, so I'll get things back on track  ;D

I hate every other forward besides Danger and Heeney, so I'm going YOLO and Greene is my F3 now. Feels good not having to waste anymore time trying to figure out who to make F3

Well the magic number does tend change slightly each year. But yeah, even an 80 average wouldn't be asking that much from him, but with all the mid rookies to choose from I guess he's not the best option.

[crowls]

bang for buck,  buy low sell high, 

[strikeforce]

Anyone interested in Lobb? $411k and dpp with ruck.

[crowls]

was all over this last year,  fitted the structure and thought he would be great dpp ruck cover as well as possible f6.  Just was not up to it.   For me to consider it I need a dpp 102K r/f and drop greene.  not worth it.  will trade around grundy or goldy issues if I need to and hope fort or zac get games and provide r3 cover.

[GoLions]

Anyone interested in Lobb? $411k and dpp with ruck.

At his price needs to be a keeper. Once Darcy or Sandi return, i can't see him going 90+

[jvalles69]

Revisiting all the midpricers I'm looking at again and now I feel the only ones I can trust will be Libba, Williams, Greene and Roberton as I think they can become keepers.

Crouch - injury risk, still can put in average scores, doubt he'll be a keeper so downgrade to Walsh.
Newman/Smith - prone to stinkers and I want consistency in my back line so I'm willing to pay up.
Miles - Prone to stinkers, not a keeper see Crouch.
Mills/McGrath - too many doubts on their positions.

Leaning towards paying up for the rooks with better job security with the spare money.

[TomK]

Revisiting all the midpricers I'm looking at again and now I feel the only ones I can trust will be Libba, Williams, Greene and Roberton as I think they can become keepers.

Crouch - injury risk, still can put in average scores, doubt he'll be a keeper so downgrade to Walsh.
Newman/Smith - prone to stinkers and I want consistency in my back line so I'm willing to pay up.
Miles - Prone to stinkers, not a keeper see Crouch.
Mills/McGrath - too many doubts on their positions.

Leaning towards paying up for the rooks with better job security with the spare money.

Crouch > Libba

[RaisyDaisy]

Revisiting all the midpricers I'm looking at again and now I feel the only ones I can trust will be Libba, Williams, Greene and Roberton as I think they can become keepers.

Crouch - injury risk, still can put in average scores, doubt he'll be a keeper so downgrade to Walsh.
Newman/Smith - prone to stinkers and I want consistency in my back line so I'm willing to pay up.
Miles - Prone to stinkers, not a keeper see Crouch.
Mills/McGrath - too many doubts on their positions.

Leaning towards paying up for the rooks with better job security with the spare money.

Crouch > Libba

Libba + 120k > Crouch

Williams, Roberton, Libba and Greene are the only ones I am considering - all guys with proven prem history

The rest are all breakout contenders, and I'm done playing that game

[TomK]

Revisiting all the midpricers I'm looking at again and now I feel the only ones I can trust will be Libba, Williams, Greene and Roberton as I think they can become keepers.

Crouch - injury risk, still can put in average scores, doubt he'll be a keeper so downgrade to Walsh.
Newman/Smith - prone to stinkers and I want consistency in my back line so I'm willing to pay up.
Miles - Prone to stinkers, not a keeper see Crouch.
Mills/McGrath - too many doubts on their positions.

Leaning towards paying up for the rooks with better job security with the spare money.

Crouch > Libba

Libba + 120k > Crouch

Sure but that wasn't what the post was referring to, it was about keeper numbers, and Crouch is more likely to be a keeper than Libba imo.