WXV Rules Discussion 2018

[RaisyDaisy]

Ah OK

I thought we were talking about rule change voting, not trading

This is the rule change thread after all, so just naturally assumed that

[Purple 77]

Oh, that's a good point actually.

I wasn't considering trade voting in that scenario. I don't see why trade voting would change at all.

This suggestion would only be for rule change voting.

[Ringo]

If going down this track I would be classifying "the do not care" as a vote against.

Do not really like the change at all though as committed coaches should be able to express an opinion one way or the other on rule changes.

[Purple 77]

If going down this track I would be classifying "the do not care" as a vote against.

Do not really like the change at all though as committed coaches should be able to express an opinion one way or the other on rule changes.

Excellent point.

[Torpedo10]

If going down this track I would be classifying "the do not care" as a vote against.

Do not really like the change at all though as committed coaches should be able to express an opinion one way or the other on rule changes.

Excellent point.

Didn't I just mention this yesterday?  :P

I always thought the general consensus was if you're a fence sitter, you vote to stay with what is already in place?

[Toga]

Well done Torp!

[Torpedo10]

Well done Torp!

Thank you 2018 WXVs Premier.

;)

[Toga]

Well done Torp!

Thank you 2018 WXVs Premier.

;)

Haha if only. Think we've left a bit too much to do today unfortunately :(

[Purple 77]

So, rule severity votes are in...

Vote Severity 
Should we introduce vote severity in our vote responses - as explained in the rule thread - instead of our current Yes/No system?

A) Yes - it will give a bigger voice to those whom are passionate about future rule changes over those whom don't mind as much.
B) No - keep it as is, you shouldn't be allowed to determine how far from the fence you are.


A - 6 votes
B - 12 votes



Ironically, under both formats B wins! So keep an eye out for the first lot of rules soon, and respond to them as quick as you can :)

[Holz]

I regret voting for rule changes

[meow meow]

I think I voted to change about 5

[Nige]

24 rules to vote on. Goodness me.

[meow meow]

Get over it you sooks. It's not difficult.

[Levi434]

Get over it you sooks. It's not difficult.

24 rule changes? 23 superlatives? I wonder if either will ever be fully voted on?

[Levi434]

Rule Proposal:

It's pretty clear that most coaches in here are too lazy to do stuff when required of them. The most telling example being the superlatives. :P

In all seriousness though, I propose a subcommittee of 4 elected representatives in which they will discuss all the rule proposals PRIOR to them being sent to a vote. We'll call this the "Rules Committee."

The 4 members will be:
Chair: Levi434
Vice-Chair: Purple 77
Elected Member:
Elected Member:

I believe that Purp definitely should be on the committee but shouldn't have to chair it. That leaves the only other person capable (Levi) to run the show. The other 2 spots will be open to any coach who would like to nominate. Also this will only apply to rule proposals NOT trades!