WXV Rules Discussion 2018

Started by Purple 77, August 04, 2018, 12:09:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

GoLions

How about we just get our highest scorer as captain?

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: GoLions on August 10, 2018, 03:41:34 PM
How about we just get our highest scorer as captain?

How about we don't name our sides anymore and the Top 15 scores from our entire list are our score?

GoLions

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on August 10, 2018, 03:51:03 PM
Quote from: GoLions on August 10, 2018, 03:41:34 PM
How about we just get our highest scorer as captain?

How about we don't name our sides anymore and the Top 15 scores from our entire list are our score?
Or just use our entire list instead of top 15? Although then may as well hand the premiership to Dublin with their superior depth.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: GoLions on August 10, 2018, 04:17:26 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on August 10, 2018, 03:51:03 PM
Quote from: GoLions on August 10, 2018, 03:41:34 PM
How about we just get our highest scorer as captain?

How about we don't name our sides anymore and the Top 15 scores from our entire list are our score?
Or just use our entire list instead of top 15? Although then may as well hand the premiership to Dublin with their superior depth.

Lol

WXLIV


Holz

Quote from: GoLions on August 10, 2018, 04:17:26 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on August 10, 2018, 03:51:03 PM
Quote from: GoLions on August 10, 2018, 03:41:34 PM
How about we just get our highest scorer as captain?

How about we don't name our sides anymore and the Top 15 scores from our entire list are our score?
Or just use our entire list instead of top 15? Although then may as well hand the premiership to Dublin with their superior depth.

Not sure about the entire list.

But handing the premiership to dublin. We should explore that as an option. I like your thinking

Levi434

Rule Proposal:

Based off many recent discussions; I say we do away with the SC positions as ours. Clearly the WXV Coaches are the smartest and most clued in set of individuals I've ever come across and therefore I think we are more than capable of listing and aligning our own positions.

Pretty clearly Champion Data/Supercoach are a bunch of flogs who have no idea how to allocate positions. E.g. Lobb, Gunston, Goddard. Therefore WXV coaches should be able to propose their player change position and a vote is held on it.

upthemaidens

#126
I do like the idea that top up players come at the end of all drafts, that's the penalty for poor list Management.

Also get rid of the Rookie list, doesn't really serve any purpose.
   

upthemaidens

Can we also get suggestions added to the Opening Post?
  Thread gets derailed with pages of waffle, that's it's hard to find what sensible suggestions have been put up.

meow meow

Quote from: Levi434 on August 11, 2018, 12:14:16 PM
Rule Proposal:

Based off many recent discussions; I say we do away with the SC positions as ours. Clearly the WXV Coaches are the smartest and most clued in set of individuals I've ever come across and therefore I think we are more than capable of listing and aligning our own positions.

Pretty clearly Champion Data/Supercoach are a bunch of flogs who have no idea how to allocate positions. E.g. Lobb, Gunston, Goddard. Therefore WXV coaches should be able to propose their player change position and a vote is held on it.

This should apply to ruckmen only.

GoLions

Quote from: meow meow on August 11, 2018, 01:21:01 PM
Quote from: Levi434 on August 11, 2018, 12:14:16 PM
Rule Proposal:

Based off many recent discussions; I say we do away with the SC positions as ours. Clearly the WXV Coaches are the smartest and most clued in set of individuals I've ever come across and therefore I think we are more than capable of listing and aligning our own positions.

Pretty clearly Champion Data/Supercoach are a bunch of flogs who have no idea how to allocate positions. E.g. Lobb, Gunston, Goddard. Therefore WXV coaches should be able to propose their player change position and a vote is held on it.

This should apply to ruckmen only.
Blicavs in defence would have been nice haha

iZander

Quote from: Levi434 on August 11, 2018, 12:14:16 PM
Rule Proposal:

Based off many recent discussions; I say we do away with the SC positions as ours. Clearly the WXV Coaches are the smartest and most clued in set of individuals I've ever come across and therefore I think we are more than capable of listing and aligning our own positions.

Pretty clearly Champion Data/Supercoach are a bunch of flogs who have no idea how to allocate positions. E.g. Lobb, Gunston, Goddard. Therefore WXV coaches should be able to propose their player change position and a vote is held on it.
I dont mind this for rucks only tbh

For guys like Lobb who was clearly going to be number 1 ruck to start the year but just didnt play it this year. Or an exampe for next year is Mason Cox who will be fwd only but is clearly Grundys back up if he were to go down leaving Toga with no ruck cover despite having the full set

Levi434

Quote from: upthemaidens on August 11, 2018, 12:53:58 PM
Can we also get suggestions added to the Opening Post?
  Thread gets derailed with pages of waffle, that's it's hard to find what sensible suggestions have been put up.

Why don't you collaborate the list yourself instead of relying on like 4 people who do all the work here in WXV?

upthemaidens

Quote from: Levi434 on August 11, 2018, 02:57:30 PM
Quote from: upthemaidens on August 11, 2018, 12:53:58 PM
Can we also get suggestions added to the Opening Post?
  Thread gets derailed with pages of waffle, that's it's hard to find what sensible suggestions have been put up.

Why don't you collaborate the list yourself instead of relying on like 4 people who do all the work here in WXV?
Or even easier, stop reading this thread and wait until the voting process occurs.

GoLions

Idk if this is a rule or not, but top draft picks should be worth more in the cap, similar to SC. E.g pick 1 worth 200k, then drop it by 5k per pick until you hit 100k.

GoLions

Quote from: GoLions on August 14, 2018, 12:45:45 AM
Idk if this is a rule or not, but top draft picks should be worth more in the cap, similar to SC. E.g pick 1 worth 200k, then drop it by 5k per pick until you hit 100k.
Also, this would remain as their 'base cap' for their first 3 years.
i e. Pick 7 would be worth 170k, if they don't play at all for 3 years, they hold that 170k value. But if they play and score alright then obviously they rise like they normally would have.