WXV Rules Discussion 2018

[GoLions]

Getting in early for the next lot of rule change votes, scrap leadership groups

[Nige]

scrap leadership groups

[Ringo]

scrap leadership groups

[meow meow]

Should reduce leadership groups to 3

[PowerBug]

Should reduce leadership groups to 3

[PowerBug]

Or we just name a C, VC, DVC, etc. and that order holds for the entire season :P

[Purple 77]

I think now is a good time for our annual review of the trade period :)

Historically, I've split the vote process into two parts. The first part will be a discussion and vote on the method of how we process trades. The second part is a vote on the specifics of the method we have vote for.

For example, the first vote will be whether we do something like...

A) Democracy - keep as is - where all coaches have a vote

B) Partial democracy - where I led a panel of coaches whom decide the outcome of each trade

C) Dictatorship - I decide every trade outcome.

And then the second vote, taking A for example, would be voting on the 'neg' levels.

Discuss... what method would you be most keen for? How did you feel the last trade period went?

[RaisyDaisy]

If it ain't broke...

[Ringo]

If it ain't broke...

[Holz]

If it ain't broke...

Agree with the above too

If it aint broke, dont fix it.

However its broke so lets fix it.

We need majority on rules and voting. Or 6 people dictating rules and trading.

We cant keep the minority winning on trades and then the majority on voting

[Ringo]

If it ain't broke...

Agree with the above too

If it aint broke, dont fix it.

However its broke so lets fix it.

We need majority on rules and voting. Or 6 people dictating rules and trading.

We cant keep the minority winning on trades and then the majority on voting

Maybe a compromise her to consider:
Admin rules on all trades
Coaches are given 72hrs (Negotiable and just suggesting for the purpose of rules).
If 4 or more coaches object to ruling then trade put to the vote of all coaches.
10 votes required to overturn decision.

Just to start discussion.

[PowerBug]

But how many that "approve" a trade are indifferent about it? Because I feel like that would be a fair few people.

I'm fine with the current trade system. It's simple.

[Holz]

But how many that "approve" a trade are indifferent about it? Because I feel like that would be a fair few people.

I'm fine with the current trade system. It's simple.

Team A wins
Neutral
Team B wins

[RaisyDaisy]

But how many that "approve" a trade are indifferent about it? Because I feel like that would be a fair few people.

I'm fine with the current trade system. It's simple.

Team A wins
Neutral
Team B wins

Is there a difference to the end result whether it's Team A or B?

Team A or B win = Neg under current system
Neutral = Pass under current system

How does identifying if it's A or B winning/losing make any difference to the result?

[GoLions]

But how many that "approve" a trade are indifferent about it? Because I feel like that would be a fair few people.

I'm fine with the current trade system. It's simple.

Team A wins
Neutral
Team B wins

Is there a difference to the end result whether it's Team A or B?

Team A or B win = Neg under current system
Neutral = Pass under current system

How does identifying if it's A or B winning/losing make any difference to the result?

8 people say team a wins
8 people say team b wins
> the perfect trade, pass

Either that or just tells us that 8 people are morons.