Finish Off Mids

Started by david17, July 02, 2018, 01:35:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Judd Magic

Quote from: david17 on July 04, 2018, 06:49:19 PM
With Fyfe and Sandi out is this gonna impact Neale scoring. He will get the tag and with Sandi out wont get palm down as easy thoughts?


Neale has scored well before with Fyfe and Sandilnds missing most of the same  season together.

Wont affect him imo.  8)

quinny88


SilverLion

Quote from: SilverLion on July 03, 2018, 09:33:20 PM
Ed Curnow?
Just going to repost this.

Not sure why this guy doesn't get any love, check out his scores this year:

95, 145, 86, 126, 126, 86, 136, 118, 110, 109, 95, 92, 102

Compares very, very similarly to Gaff imo.

Mongoose528

Quote from: SilverLion on July 05, 2018, 10:38:28 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 03, 2018, 09:33:20 PM
Ed Curnow?
Just going to repost this.

Not sure why this guy doesn't get any love, check out his scores this year:

95, 145, 86, 126, 126, 86, 136, 118, 110, 109, 95, 92, 102

Compares very, very similarly to Gaff imo.

Favourable draw to end the year as well.

HoleMeal

Quote from: Mongoose528 on July 05, 2018, 11:00:35 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 05, 2018, 10:38:28 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 03, 2018, 09:33:20 PM
Ed Curnow?
Just going to repost this.

Not sure why this guy doesn't get any love, check out his scores this year:

95, 145, 86, 126, 126, 86, 136, 118, 110, 109, 95, 92, 102

Compares very, very similarly to Gaff imo.

Favourable draw to end the year as well.
5 scores 95 or less.

Gaff only has 3 below 95.

I have Curnow and need to trade out Fyfe for someone, probably Gaff. If I had neither I would be going Gaff just over Curnow. Also believe that the Eagles have more to play for in rounds 20-23 than the Blues and less likely that Gaff gets a rest.
Blues could send players to surgery early and just pull up stumps on a horible season.
My 2 cents.

SilverLion

Quote from: HoleMeal on July 05, 2018, 11:33:26 AM
Quote from: Mongoose528 on July 05, 2018, 11:00:35 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 05, 2018, 10:38:28 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 03, 2018, 09:33:20 PM
Ed Curnow?
Just going to repost this.

Not sure why this guy doesn't get any love, check out his scores this year:

95, 145, 86, 126, 126, 86, 136, 118, 110, 109, 95, 92, 102

Compares very, very similarly to Gaff imo.

Favourable draw to end the year as well.
5 scores 95 or less.

Gaff only has 3 below 95.

I have Curnow and need to trade out Fyfe for someone, probably Gaff. If I had neither I would be going Gaff just over Curnow. Also believe that the Eagles have more to play for in rounds 20-23 than the Blues and less likely that Gaff gets a rest.
Blues could send players to surgery early and just pull up stumps on a horible season.
My 2 cents.

Scores sorted low to high (note Gaff has played an extra game):

Gaff: 74, 85, 92, 102, 103, 103, 103, 107, 114, 122, 123, 128, 135, 136 = 109.1 average
Curnow: 86, 86, 92, 95, 95, 102, 109, 110, 118, 126, 126, 136, 148 = 109.9 average

Could also say that Gaff has 7 games 103 or below, whilst Curnow has 6. The data can be biased towards either of them depending on how you want to view it ;)

I agree with most of what you said though, but my argument is that I would rate Curnow ahead of every option listed, with possibly the exception of Gaff. Would have them basically ranked about the same.

Just a bit surprised no-one else has even brought him up.

Wanderer

Quote from: SilverLion on July 05, 2018, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: HoleMeal on July 05, 2018, 11:33:26 AM
Quote from: Mongoose528 on July 05, 2018, 11:00:35 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 05, 2018, 10:38:28 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 03, 2018, 09:33:20 PM
Ed Curnow?
Just going to repost this.

Not sure why this guy doesn't get any love, check out his scores this year:

95, 145, 86, 126, 126, 86, 136, 118, 110, 109, 95, 92, 102

Compares very, very similarly to Gaff imo.

Favourable draw to end the year as well.
5 scores 95 or less.

Gaff only has 3 below 95.

I have Curnow and need to trade out Fyfe for someone, probably Gaff. If I had neither I would be going Gaff just over Curnow. Also believe that the Eagles have more to play for in rounds 20-23 than the Blues and less likely that Gaff gets a rest.
Blues could send players to surgery early and just pull up stumps on a horible season.
My 2 cents.

Scores sorted low to high (note Gaff has played an extra game):

Gaff: 74, 85, 92, 102, 103, 103, 103, 107, 114, 122, 123, 128, 135, 136 = 109.1 average
Curnow: 86, 86, 92, 95, 95, 102, 109, 110, 118, 126, 126, 136, 148 = 109.9 average

Could also say that Gaff has 7 games 103 or below, whilst Curnow has 6. The data can be biased towards either of them depending on how you want to view it ;)

I agree with most of what you said though, but my argument is that I would rate Curnow ahead of every option listed, with possibly the exception of Gaff. Would have them basically ranked about the same.

Just a bit surprised no-one else has even brought him up.

How does Murphy coming back into the side impact Curnow's scoring?

SilverLion

Quote from: Wanderer on July 05, 2018, 06:39:03 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 05, 2018, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: HoleMeal on July 05, 2018, 11:33:26 AM
Quote from: Mongoose528 on July 05, 2018, 11:00:35 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 05, 2018, 10:38:28 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 03, 2018, 09:33:20 PM
Ed Curnow?
Just going to repost this.

Not sure why this guy doesn't get any love, check out his scores this year:

95, 145, 86, 126, 126, 86, 136, 118, 110, 109, 95, 92, 102

Compares very, very similarly to Gaff imo.

Favourable draw to end the year as well.
5 scores 95 or less.

Gaff only has 3 below 95.

I have Curnow and need to trade out Fyfe for someone, probably Gaff. If I had neither I would be going Gaff just over Curnow. Also believe that the Eagles have more to play for in rounds 20-23 than the Blues and less likely that Gaff gets a rest.
Blues could send players to surgery early and just pull up stumps on a horible season.
My 2 cents.

Scores sorted low to high (note Gaff has played an extra game):

Gaff: 74, 85, 92, 102, 103, 103, 103, 107, 114, 122, 123, 128, 135, 136 = 109.1 average
Curnow: 86, 86, 92, 95, 95, 102, 109, 110, 118, 126, 126, 136, 148 = 109.9 average

Could also say that Gaff has 7 games 103 or below, whilst Curnow has 6. The data can be biased towards either of them depending on how you want to view it ;)

I agree with most of what you said though, but my argument is that I would rate Curnow ahead of every option listed, with possibly the exception of Gaff. Would have them basically ranked about the same.

Just a bit surprised no-one else has even brought him up.

How does Murphy coming back into the side impact Curnow's scoring?
Curnow's scores with Muprhy in the side this year:  95, 148, 86, 102

Don't think he'll really have an impact on him based off that.

Samm79


Bully


Samm79


david17

Well i got JPK last night he scored 103 was hoping for 120+ but at least he got to 100 now i gotta decide out of Neale and Gaff

fanTCfool

Quote from: SilverLion on July 05, 2018, 07:31:17 PM
Quote from: Wanderer on July 05, 2018, 06:39:03 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 05, 2018, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: HoleMeal on July 05, 2018, 11:33:26 AM
Quote from: Mongoose528 on July 05, 2018, 11:00:35 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 05, 2018, 10:38:28 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 03, 2018, 09:33:20 PM
Ed Curnow?
Just going to repost this.

Not sure why this guy doesn't get any love, check out his scores this year:

95, 145, 86, 126, 126, 86, 136, 118, 110, 109, 95, 92, 102

Compares very, very similarly to Gaff imo.

Favourable draw to end the year as well.
5 scores 95 or less.

Gaff only has 3 below 95.

I have Curnow and need to trade out Fyfe for someone, probably Gaff. If I had neither I would be going Gaff just over Curnow. Also believe that the Eagles have more to play for in rounds 20-23 than the Blues and less likely that Gaff gets a rest.
Blues could send players to surgery early and just pull up stumps on a horible season.
My 2 cents.

Scores sorted low to high (note Gaff has played an extra game):

Gaff: 74, 85, 92, 102, 103, 103, 103, 107, 114, 122, 123, 128, 135, 136 = 109.1 average
Curnow: 86, 86, 92, 95, 95, 102, 109, 110, 118, 126, 126, 136, 148 = 109.9 average

Could also say that Gaff has 7 games 103 or below, whilst Curnow has 6. The data can be biased towards either of them depending on how you want to view it ;)

I agree with most of what you said though, but my argument is that I would rate Curnow ahead of every option listed, with possibly the exception of Gaff. Would have them basically ranked about the same.

Just a bit surprised no-one else has even brought him up.

How does Murphy coming back into the side impact Curnow's scoring?
Curnow's scores with Muprhy in the side this year:  95, 148, 86, 102

Don't think he'll really have an impact on him based off that.

It appears to me as though Curnow has been lining up on the wing as opposed to being in the guts more frequently over the last few weeks, and his tackle numbers have really started to drop since earlier in the season. I think there's better options.