Danger v Macrae

[TableKing]

Hi all, would love to know where we all stand on Danger and Macrae.

I think it is clear that Macrae is not only elite but he is leading the pack in consistancy and clearly a must have option.

Danger is danger and looking at recent form he is not far from getting back into his elite form of previous years.

I currently dont hold either player but Macrae has a low BE and large scores as his ongoing average so the longer you wait the more to pay. Danger i feel has hit his lowest price, can see him hitting 130 minimum if not 150 for essendon and his price will stsrt to rise.

Given the above, where do you sit on trading either in?

[BomberSam]

For me, the Macrae ship has sailed at this point.

Danger is a must have at his current price.

[Bully]

Macrae will start copping attention, nothing more certain. If he drops below 600k again then worth considering.

[_wato]

I'm loving the fact Macrae is killing it. Means Bont gets off the chain when Macrae gets the tag and can do what he does best !!

[shaker]

Macrae will start copping attention, nothing more certain. If he drops below 600k again then worth considering.

Yep nothing surer checked the archives he was never tagged once in 2016 - 2017 and this year he was given some attention by Banfield for 98 and he has some good teams with good taggers coming up so I want to see what he does when the " glove jacobs " gets hold of him and how he handles being tagged ..... Danger for me and Macrae after the byes if he is still punching out big scores.

[Woppa15]

Brought Macrae in two weeks ago and he has single handedly pocketed me almost 700 points in just two weeks and I couldn’t be happier! His HUGE ceiling will easily make up for any 90 - 110 scores he throws out with the odd tag....

[MontyJnr]

I’d like to see Danger back it up with a consecutive big score personally.

Macrae has been incredible and love having him in my side, but he did just play GC & Brisbane. Probably a post-bye target for non-owners now.

[quinny88]

Macrae the better pick this year. Danger still way too much time forward

[SilverLion]

Wouldn't be getting Macrae at his current price. Type of guy to look at after his bye when he goes back to around 600-630k.

Danger still only one sub 100 score, despite playing more forward. Would seriously consider.

[North Melbournes Finest]

Look at when North (Jacobs) play Bulldogs, and aim to pick him up about 2 weeks after the 70-80 rolls out of his b.e.

But seriously, I'm going to bring in Dangerfield, it's a no brainer for me. Whilst I love Macrae, he's more expensive by a fair bit than Danger, and I'm pretty confident that Danger will at least match or surpass what Macrae does for the rest of the year.

[tor01doc]

Look at when North (Jacobs) play Bulldogs, and aim to pick him up about 2 weeks after the 70-80 rolls out of his b.e.

But seriously, I'm going to bring in Dangerfield, it's a no brainer for me. Whilst I love Macrae, he's more expensive by a fair bit than Danger, and I'm pretty confident that Danger will at least match or surpass what Macrae does for the rest of the year.

::)

[H1bb3i2d]

Very glad I jumped on last week. Anybody know what his ownership is like now? It's gonna be tough for anybody else to jump aboard now

[tommy10]

Very glad I jumped on last week. Anybody know what his ownership is like now? It's gonna be tough for anybody else to jump aboard now

At 13% currently. But jeez he’s killing it this year!

[TableKing]

Who cares at this stage. Im not sure there is such a thing as missing the boat. He scored 177 without scoring a goal. Nobody in the comp is doing that!!!
Cant believe i keep selecting others over him.

[Ringo]

Macrae may be a bit pricey now to get in and yes I do not have him either.