Bottomed out mids

[addysstuff]

Bring in Merrett this week or wait a week for Crouch??? Can't decide.

[jfitty]

Yeah I’m looking at bringing in one of these guys myself.

Merrett/JPK this week or Crouch next week. Can only grab one though..

[EA100]

If I had the money and opportunity to wait a week for crouch, I’d definitely do it. Proven scorer and was doing so this year as well before he got injured. B/E of 182, so should drop a decent amount as well.

[GoSaints3]

Im waiting for Crouch, already have 6 premos and a spot waiting for Titch (don’t want to discuss why I didn’t start him :() Crouch should average more than both Zerrett and JPK

[iZander]

Bring in JPK, i dare you :P

[GCSkiwi]

I'm pretty tempted by Zerrett, But I already have Dusty, Titch, Fyfe, Conigs, Cripps and JKelly, Money there to grab Danger probably next week, so I really ony have one spot to fill. With Billings killing my fwd line taking a slightly cheap punt on Zerrett seems appealing, but I can probably do better if I wait for Crouch...

[smashbox]

What about lachie neale? Wont cop the tag with fyfe in the team and also has a couple seasons history of 110+
Is he a better option than Merett and Crouch?

[_wato]

Grabbing Neale this week, then grabbing Crouch next week and will have 8 prem mids but still not sure on all of them.

Will have

Titch, Fyfe, MCrouch, Neale, Bont, Beams, Oliver, Cogs

Danger will come in and probably at the expense of my worst performing mid. Danger and Dusty are spending a lot of time up forward and more than I’d like which is concerning. If they don’t kick goals they are scoring 90’s and that isn’t really that amazing.
So thinking I can afford to wait to see what the role will be for both of them. Should both be good for 110 but as seen with Dusty, should be able to pick them up between 550-600k so will wait for that drop to occur.

[Ricochet]

Danger will be bottomed out soon, but I might go early if Walters is out for a while

[jfitty]

Danger will be bottomed out soon, but I might go early if Walters is out for a while

That's what I'll do this week I think.. Danger will lose some more money, but might as well make the most of Walters' price tag

[Ringo]

Treloar anyone had the slow start with an 87 and 2 low 100s but last 3 of 120, 127 and 149.  Has a B/e of 79 this week and has an average of and has an average of 143 for last 3 against Brisbane.
Seems to be the go to mid as well with Pies.

[Brikett]

Depends on the structure of your mids.

I've already got Danger Titch Fyfe Oliver Dependlebury Coniglio so I'll be looking to fill the last two spots with Super premos.

Crouch the better player and will average more, but Zmerret you'd think will go between 105-110 for the rest of the year and for that price it'd be hard to pass up.

[jfitty]

Treloar anyone had the slow start with an 87 and 2 low 100s but last 3 of 120, 127 and 149.  Has a B/e of 79 this week and has an average of and has an average of 143 for last 3 against Brisbane.
Seems to be the go to mid as well with Pies.

I am definitely interested as of this morning.

Thinking either him or Pendles instead of a Crouch/Merrett type.

With so many midfields starting to look a little similar, one of the Collingwood boys could be a great POD ???

[Wanderer]

What about lachie neale? Wont cop the tag with fyfe in the team and also has a couple seasons history of 110+
Is he a better option than Merett and Crouch?

I've had Neale from the start and it looked as though Walters was eating into his points. Walters goes down early in the game and Neale pumps out a big score. I think Neale will score big while Walters is out, but will go back to around 100 when he returns.

[ubeaut]

What about lachie neale? Wont cop the tag with fyfe in the team and also has a couple seasons history of 110+
Is he a better option than Merett and Crouch?

I've had Neale from the start and it looked as though Walters was eating into his points. Walters goes down early in the game and Neale pumps out a big score. I think Neale will score big while Walters is out, but will go back to around 100 when he returns.

No, Walters was not eating his points.
Neale was still getting big disposal numbers, it was his disposal efficiency that let him down.