Jack Henry VS Mitch Crowden

Started by waldorfs wizards, April 11, 2018, 09:36:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

sammy123

Got crowden his dP is too valuable

tor01doc


MontyJnr

Found this thread really helpful :)

I'd love to see more dedicated "Player v Player" threads like this to encourage detailed discussion.

The "Player X v Player Y" megathread really isn't that helpful when you often get a 1 word answer from 1 person before everyone moves to the next comparison.

Nige

Quote from: Bully on April 12, 2018, 10:47:55 PM
Quote from: ubeaut on April 12, 2018, 10:15:03 PM
Yeah no Higgins flowers things up.
Are people with Ryan now thinking either Crowden or Henry have to come in now given no other fwd rookies on immediate horizon?
If so which one and why?

Matt Guelfi is a good option so I'll just wait and see how he goes. No need to panic.
Yep, exactly.

And if what Leon Cameron said holds true, we could see ZGL back next week potentially which is great for those of us who still have him.

SilverLion

Quote from: MontyJnr on April 13, 2018, 12:10:22 AM
Found this thread really helpful :)

I'd love to see more dedicated "Player v Player" threads like this to encourage detailed discussion.

The "Player X v Player Y" megathread really isn't that helpful when you often get a 1 word answer from 1 person before everyone moves to the next comparison.
It has its niche I think. These threads are good for situations like this where a lot of people are going to be making a similar comparison.

For individual ones that are unique to a person's team I would say the megathread is better, just keeps the forum tidier.

MontyJnr

#50
Quote from: SilverLion on April 13, 2018, 12:19:33 AM
Quote from: MontyJnr on April 13, 2018, 12:10:22 AM
Found this thread really helpful :)

I'd love to see more dedicated "Player v Player" threads like this to encourage detailed discussion.

The "Player X v Player Y" megathread really isn't that helpful when you often get a 1 word answer from 1 person before everyone moves to the next comparison.
It has its niche I think. These threads are good for situations like this where a lot of people are going to be making a similar comparison.

For individual ones that are unique to a person's team I would say the megathread is better, just keeps the forum tidier.

The reason I started coming here a few years ago was because it was relatively "un-moderated" and it excelled at having a heap of well-answered topics tailored to particular scenarios/comparisons. It was unique and provided a refreshing point of difference to "tidy" forums like BigFooty, Supercoach Coach, Supercoach Scores & Too Serious. Now it is pretty much the same as all these sites unfortunately.

I found the search function really helpful to find discussion before starting a thread too. Even if you started a thread and it got lost behind all the others, just bump it and you would always get a few responses at the very least. Fan Footy's glory days IMO :)

Nige

Quote from: MontyJnr on April 13, 2018, 12:36:36 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on April 13, 2018, 12:19:33 AM
Quote from: MontyJnr on April 13, 2018, 12:10:22 AM
Found this thread really helpful :)

I'd love to see more dedicated "Player v Player" threads like this to encourage detailed discussion.

The "Player X v Player Y" megathread really isn't that helpful when you often get a 1 word answer from 1 person before everyone moves to the next comparison.
It has its niche I think. These threads are good for situations like this where a lot of people are going to be making a similar comparison.

For individual ones that are unique to a person's team I would say the megathread is better, just keeps the forum tidier.

The reason I started coming here a few years ago was because it was relatively "un-moderated" and it excelled at having a heap of well-answered topics tailored to particular scenarios/comparisons. It was unique and provided a refreshing point of difference to "tidy" forums like BigFooty, Supercoach Coach, Supercoach Scores & Too Serious. Now it is pretty much the same as all these sites unfortunately.

I found the search function really helpful to find discussion before starting a thread too. Even if you started a thread and it got lost behind all the others, just bump it and you would always get a few responses at the very least. Fan Footy's glory days IMO :)
The latter is still very much the case.

Hogan17

Henry only 39% game time first game then pumps out a score in the 90's. JS probably better than Crowden. I'm picking the better JS and better scoring player over DPP personally.

PowerBug

Quote from: MontyJnr on April 13, 2018, 12:36:36 AM
The reason I started coming here a few years ago was because it was relatively "un-moderated" and it excelled at having a heap of well-answered topics tailored to particular scenarios/comparisons. It was unique and provided a refreshing point of difference to "tidy" forums like BigFooty, Supercoach Coach, Supercoach Scores & Too Serious. Now it is pretty much the same as all these sites unfortunately.

I found the search function really helpful to find discussion before starting a thread too. Even if you started a thread and it got lost behind all the others, just bump it and you would always get a few responses at the very least. Fan Footy's glory days IMO :)
Hey mate, what parts makes you think that we're now the same as the other sites? What is it that we (as mods) should look at doing/not doing moving forward in your opinion?

Search function is still there, not sure how good it is from the few times I've used it. Also those glory days were fantasy footballs glory days too, when the numbers were twice as big as we have now.


Quote from: Hogan17 on April 13, 2018, 02:16:01 PM
Henry only 39% game time first game then pumps out a score in the 90's. JS probably better than Crowden. I'm picking the better JS and better scoring player over DPP personally.
Aaaaaaand now I'm back to thinking Henry is better... :-\
Leader of the King Karl Amon fan club
Coach of WXV side Rio De Janeiro Jaguars
2023 SC: Rank 126

frenzy

Quote from: Hogan17 on April 13, 2018, 02:16:01 PM
Henry only 39% game time first game then pumps out a score in the 90's. JS probably better than Crowden. I'm picking the better JS and better scoring player over DPP personally.

massive rookie POD, only 400 teams last I checked.

fanTCfool

Quote from: frenzy on April 13, 2018, 03:59:11 PM
Quote from: Hogan17 on April 13, 2018, 02:16:01 PM
Henry only 39% game time first game then pumps out a score in the 90's. JS probably better than Crowden. I'm picking the better JS and better scoring player over DPP personally.

massive rookie POD, only 400 teams last I checked.

12,097 teams (and counting) have brought him in this week mate, hardly a POD.

frenzy

Quote from: fanTCfool on April 13, 2018, 04:02:19 PM
Quote from: frenzy on April 13, 2018, 03:59:11 PM
Quote from: Hogan17 on April 13, 2018, 02:16:01 PM
Henry only 39% game time first game then pumps out a score in the 90's. JS probably better than Crowden. I'm picking the better JS and better scoring player over DPP personally.

massive rookie POD, only 400 teams last I checked.

12,097 teams (and counting) have brought him in this week mate, hardly a POD.

Lol, mine still says 0.2% 297 teams, dunno whats going on there.

fanTCfool

Quote from: frenzy on April 13, 2018, 04:10:47 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on April 13, 2018, 04:02:19 PM
Quote from: frenzy on April 13, 2018, 03:59:11 PM
Quote from: Hogan17 on April 13, 2018, 02:16:01 PM
Henry only 39% game time first game then pumps out a score in the 90's. JS probably better than Crowden. I'm picking the better JS and better scoring player over DPP personally.

massive rookie POD, only 400 teams last I checked.

12,097 teams (and counting) have brought him in this week mate, hardly a POD.

Lol, mine still says 0.2% 297 teams, dunno whats going on there.

The ownership percentages are not live during the week, they don't update continually, only at the conclusion of a round.

frenzy

Quote from: fanTCfool on April 13, 2018, 04:12:43 PM
Quote from: frenzy on April 13, 2018, 04:10:47 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on April 13, 2018, 04:02:19 PM
Quote from: frenzy on April 13, 2018, 03:59:11 PM
Quote from: Hogan17 on April 13, 2018, 02:16:01 PM
Henry only 39% game time first game then pumps out a score in the 90's. JS probably better than Crowden. I'm picking the better JS and better scoring player over DPP personally.

massive rookie POD, only 400 teams last I checked.

12,097 teams (and counting) have brought him in this week mate, hardly a POD.

Lol, mine still says 0.2% 297 teams, dunno whats going on there.

The ownership percentages are not live during the week, they don't update continually, only at the conclusion of a round.

thank you, knew it must of been something like that. I should subscribe obviously, one day.

MontyJnr

Quote from: PowerBug on April 13, 2018, 02:29:41 PM
Hey mate, what parts makes you think that we're now the same as the other sites? What is it that we (as mods) should look at doing/not doing moving forward in your opinion?

Search function is still there, not sure how good it is from the few times I've used it. Also those glory days were fantasy footballs glory days too, when the numbers were twice as big as we have now.

I think merging everything into "Player X v Player Y" & "Round X Trades" threads makes it similar to other sites. I liked that Fan Footy was different in that respect.

The search function isn't as effective as it used to be because there just isn't much detailed discussion anymore. This could be a result of fantasy football's drop in popularity like you say, but I wouldn't rule out the change in forum dynamics being a factor to why people have left.