Lachie Neale

[whynot102]

Have Neale and although avg 30 possessions hasnt cracked the ton once do i hold or luxury trade to Gibbs or alike.
Thoughts

[jbjimmyjb]

I'm in the same situation as you, but we picked him for a reason; we obviously saw him as a keeper.
Must hold.

[ubeaut]

I'm in the same situation as you, but we picked him for a reason; we obviously saw him as a keeper.
Must hold.

That's what people said to me about Zerrett and look how that turned out lol.
There's no must about it.
Seriously tho in Neales case I would be inclined to hold, getting 30 touches is a great sign, just needs to clean up DE. Fyfe more likely to cop any tag.

[nperera95]

Was in the same situation but with zorko. Ended up trading him in for Gibbs due to that fact that I've pretty been lucky with suspensions and LTIs unlike some others on this forum, even though its early days I'm doubtful zorko will perform as well as he did last year and may be a low end top 15 mid and can't really afford to lose to much cash therefore why i did the luxury trade

[RaisyDaisy]

@FantasyFreako
For those asking, Lachie Neale's kicking efficiency has dropped by 19% this year, as to his tackles to 2.7 per game, down from 4.5. There's your drop. #supercoach

[Bully]

Neale has often been a slow starter, should pick up the pace as the season progresses. Probably one to look at once he drops below 500k.

[whynot102]

Again one of the best on ground and still only 85 points over this what to do with him may survive as we’d to do Holman to Omera

[_wato]

I wouldn't be too worried. Accumulation isn't the issue, just his ball use. Would be more worried if it was the other way around.

He'll come good. Back to back 110 seasons, he's a seasoned performer. I'm heavily looking at him for around $510k next week.

[strikeforce]

I wouldn't be too worried. Accumulation isn't the issue, just his ball use. Would be more worried if it was the other way around.

He'll come good. Back to back 110 seasons, he's a seasoned performer. I'm heavily looking at him for around $510k next week.

Shhhh dont give it away. Ill look at him also for $500k. will be a ideal m8/m9 come season end. he will still average 105-110 from here

[quinny88]

I wouldn't be too worried. Accumulation isn't the issue, just his ball use. Would be more worried if it was the other way around.

He'll come good. Back to back 110 seasons, he's a seasoned performer. I'm heavily looking at him for around $510k next week.

Shhhh dont give it away. Ill look at him also for $500k. will be a ideal m8/m9 come season end. he will still average 105-110 from here

Makes absolutely no sense to bring in a guy that is scoring poorly. Unless their average is down due to injury then I don't see the reason for picking him up in the hope that he turns it around. Better to wait until he does pick up his scoring before even considering