M.Crouch

[billnats]

Gibbs or Jelwood for me... just not sure who yet!

[RaisyDaisy]

Might sound crazy, but I'm going to consider holding him for one week

He won't lose cash, and I can use my 2 trades to make solid correctional trades this week and then look to trade Crouch the week after

[Bully]

Might sound crazy, but I'm going to consider holding him for one week

He won't lose cash, and I can use my 2 trades to make solid correctional trades this week and then look to trade Crouch the week after

Depends on who you want. Dusty will go up in price if he's the bloke you are targeting.

[billnats]

Might sound crazy, but I'm going to consider holding him for one week

He won't lose cash, and I can use my 2 trades to make solid correctional trades this week and then look to trade Crouch the week after

Thinking the same to be honest... already have Dusty, Danger, Titch, Fyfe. May as well hold Crouch and hope 3 rookies do a job for me. Kelly and Holman shown they can. Just need one other to step up.

[RaisyDaisy]

Might sound crazy, but I'm going to consider holding him for one week

He won't lose cash, and I can use my 2 trades to make solid correctional trades this week and then look to trade Crouch the week after

Depends on who you want. Dusty will go up in price if he's the bloke you are targeting.

Everyone I want will go up in price, so I guess it's a matter of prioritizing

Dusty seems like the obvious choice to replace Couch, but I also want to see how Danger goes and Oliver looks very good too so maybe giving them all another week and holding Crouch for one week might be alright. If Dusty/Oliver go up 20k or so then so be it

Getting rid of guys who will bleed cash like Hibberd might be more of a priority for next week

[Bully]

Might sound crazy, but I'm going to consider holding him for one week

He won't lose cash, and I can use my 2 trades to make solid correctional trades this week and then look to trade Crouch the week after

Depends on who you want. Dusty will go up in price if he's the bloke you are targeting.

Everyone I want will go up in price, so I guess it's a matter of prioritizing

Dusty seems like the obvious choice to replace Couch, but I also want to see how Danger goes and Oliver looks very good too so maybe giving them all another week and holding Crouch for one week might be alright. If Dusty/Oliver go up 20k or so then so be it

Getting rid of guys who will bleed cash like Hibberd might be more of a priority for next week

Agree with that, will need some funds to get Danger as well.

[igotworms]

I'm thinking straight trade to Gibbs. Already have Dusty and can't afford Danger...... as yet!!
Here are my reasons why. (Staying positive, so focusing on the pros as opposed to any cons there may be)

1. Had two great games so far, and has appeared to fit in seamlessly to the side.
2. Gets plenty of the pill and more importantly, is a great user of it.
3. Kicks goals.
4. Is extremely durable.
5. Used to play for Carlton, so I have a soft spot for him!
6. I don't see Brad Crouch coming back for some time with that groin injury, Matt Crouch I'm hazarding a guess at four weeks.
7. Ties in with my set up with the bye structure. (Crouch to Gibbs being both Adelaide)
8. The tag (if there is one other than Jacobs, Curnow) usually goes to Sloane.

Correct me if I'm wrong on the above, and enthral me with your acumen people. My other option would be Luke Parker if he steps up again this week. Josh Kelly would require extra funds meaning another trade to downgrade!
[/quote]
That Clayton fella at Melbourne goes alright too.
[/quote]

and suddenly it appears clear again........ Crouch to Oliver! Spot on SilverLion, he even punched out a tidy 146 to reinforce your comment! Imagine if he kicked the ball more!!! :o

[Dazzalenko]

confirmed out for 3 weeks, what are people doing? 3 weeks sounds like a lot at this stage..

[Colty]

confirmed out for 3 weeks, what are people doing? 3 weeks sounds like a lot at this stage..

Coniglio for Crouch....

[Holz]

confirmed out for 3 weeks, what are people doing? 3 weeks sounds like a lot at this stage..

Coniglio for Crouch....

yep has to go. conigs is on fire. He reminds me of murphy last year. Underpriced, but common and starts guns blazing. I dont think he is a top 8 mid but ill make 150k from crouch to conigs which is worth the trade.

It also means I have the cash to go Zorko to Danger which is a little silly but your never really that silly if your trading in a fit Danger.

[SilverLion]

confirmed out for 3 weeks, what are people doing? 3 weeks sounds like a lot at this stage..

In reality its only 2 weeks, did it last Thursday, will miss next two and in theory be available the following round.

Contemplating holding.

[SydneyRox]

has to go for me, have moved him up to selwood and naughton to bonner

[billnats]

Because i can’t pick between Jelwood, Gibbs, Parker and Coniglio... I may hold as well

[RaisyDaisy]

“It’s a pretty straightforward hammy, low-grade,” Hass said.

“We expect him to be out for about the 21-day period.”

There's a part of me that really wants to hold him

The loss in points by having to field a rookie is what worries me though, although I could use Crouch to loophole giving me two cracks at it each week

[billnats]

AT the same time, with scores of 105 and 50, he will be a brilliant upgrade to said rookies in 5-6 weeks.

I just can’t decide who comes in. I dislike Oliver as a footballer and just can’t  bring myself to getting him in. Jelwood, surely can’t  keep the points up with Ablett and Danger and Duncan to return. Parker feels so 2013.

Leave at me with Gibbs or Coniglio and that make sure me feel  :-\

May end up with just Kelly to be on the safe side