Mid priced madness, the not discussed that much edition

Started by Colty, March 08, 2018, 01:51:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Money Shot

Quote from: SilverLion on March 08, 2018, 07:51:43 PM
Quote from: Spite on March 08, 2018, 05:54:31 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 08, 2018, 05:47:50 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on March 08, 2018, 04:40:01 PM
There is a reason they are not being discussed.
Everyone doesn't want to give away their sneaky PODs?

Yeah I reckon it is pretty close minded of you MS. Probably would be more helpful if you give the reason as to WHY you think they are not being discussed.

See below;

Quote from: Spite on March 08, 2018, 03:45:39 PM
I'd like to see another good performance from Darcy Macpherson. He averaged over 110+ SC in the NEAFL (granted that it isn't too hard) and was a massive ball winner. If he puts in another 100+ next week then there is definitely a case for selection even with the dodgy JS.

The other picks don't have the scoring potential to outweigh the negatives imo

I'll have a crack  ;D

MacPherson: JS and scoring output
Bowes: Scoring output
Perryman: JS and scoring output
Aliir: JS

I think there are some mid pricers that are due for some discussion and are yet to though.

Dunkley and The Seed to name a couple.
SL nailed it on the head ;)

Colley Dogs

#16
Personally I’m taking a hybrid approach, with a combination of top-end Rookies and low-end mid-pricers.

In usual seasons you can patch together fourteen 123k Rookies to deliver 45 - 50 points a piece, and perhaps invest in a couple of 160k+ Rookies for a 70+ return. This season, however, I believe you need to pay a premium price for a handful of Rookies just to ensure you’re growing baseline money in all areas.

I’m not comfortable with it, but I’m currently running:

(Sicily)
Dunkley
Christensen

Coffield
Naughton
Brayshaw (Freo)
Brodie
Stephenson

I know it’s a lot for little return, but I have to trust my read. I believe those who choose to go thin on Rookies will start strong, but suffer on the backend.