RATE MY TEAM. TOP 1% every year - Rate for Rate

[smashbox]

I'm still not sold on Hurley. I think Yeo with mid time is the safer bet

[smashbox]

Darcy Cameron to come in now with Naismith going down. Makes the Lycett choice a little bit safer now. Still very risky!

[Money Shot]

I'm still not sold on Hurley. I think Yeo with mid time is the safer bet

averaged 109 after his bye. enough said.

[fasttrack13]

I'm still not sold on Hurley. I think Yeo with mid time is the safer bet

averaged 109 after his bye. enough said.

I'd be picking Yeo over Hurley... Low possessions high impact. Intercepts and lots of contested possessions dramatically increases points per possession. Unless he accumulates a lot of clangers, his midfield time will help him eliminate a lot of his under 70 scores. Will go forward and hit the scoreboard at times too.

[smashbox]

Yep i'll be sticking with Yeo. Dont trust hurley with injury and being a KPP

[Bully]

I'm still not sold on Hurley. I think Yeo with mid time is the safer bet

averaged 109 after his bye. enough said.

I'd be picking Yeo over Hurley... Low possessions high impact. Intercepts and lots of contested possessions dramatically increases points per possession. Unless he accumulates a lot of clangers, his midfield time will help him eliminate a lot of his under 70 scores. Will go forward and hit the scoreboard at times too.

Hurley hasn't really been playing as a lockdown defender, he also has two seasons of premo scoring behind him. On top of that Yeo has been battling a hip injury and also tanked in the tail end of 2017. One ton in his last 11 matches tells me he's the one carrying the risk.

[smashbox]

I'm still not sold on Hurley. I think Yeo with mid time is the safer bet

averaged 109 after his bye. enough said.

I'd be picking Yeo over Hurley... Low possessions high impact. Intercepts and lots of contested possessions dramatically increases points per possession. Unless he accumulates a lot of clangers, his midfield time will help him eliminate a lot of his under 70 scores. Will go forward and hit the scoreboard at times too.

Hurley hasn't really been playing as a lockdown defender, he also has two seasons of premo scoring behind him. On top of that Yeo has been battling a hip injury and also tanked in the tail end of 2017. One ton in his last 11 matches tells me he's the one carrying the risk.

wow your convincing me!

[SilverLion]

I'm still not sold on Hurley. I think Yeo with mid time is the safer bet

averaged 109 after his bye. enough said.

I'd be picking Yeo over Hurley... Low possessions high impact. Intercepts and lots of contested possessions dramatically increases points per possession. Unless he accumulates a lot of clangers, his midfield time will help him eliminate a lot of his under 70 scores. Will go forward and hit the scoreboard at times too.

Hurley hasn't really been playing as a lockdown defender, he also has two seasons of premo scoring behind him. On top of that Yeo has been battling a hip injury and also tanked in the tail end of 2017. One ton in his last 11 matches tells me he's the one carrying the risk.

Agreed. Not sure why people are considering Yeo when we know what we're going to get from all of Laird, Hibberd and Hurley. Yeo the only ? mark, and IMO, the one thats best to leave out and pick up during the year once we know his role (and if he is scoring well :P)

[smashbox]

D4 is my biggest worry.

Just cant decide between Sicily, Lloyd, Shaw

[Samsturmfels]

D4 is my biggest worry.

Just cant decide between Sicily, Lloyd, Shaw

out of the three shaw is probably the safest pick in regards to knowing what role he will be playing in his particular team. Although for Sicily and Lloyd to perform at their max we need them to stay in their preferred roles, such as Sicily staying in the backline and not being moved to the forward line where he doesnt score as well. Also lloyd is very consistent  but he generally in the past hasnt seemed to score massively, which means you most likely will be able to pick him up for reasonable price later on.

For me, Im going Sicily. Although he may be the riskiest pick out of the three, I see alot of value in picking him due to his dpp, low price and friendly bye (forgot which round it was)

[smashbox]

They all have the benefits and flaws. One of the hardest decisions I'm making

[smashbox]

B: E. Yeo, R. Laird, M. Hibberd, A. Naughton, T. Doedee, J. Finlayson (S. Murray, L. Murphy)

C: P. Dangerfield, T. Mitchell, N. Fyfe, P. Cripps, S. Coniglio, J. O'mera, A. Brayshaw, T. Kelly (Z. Bailey, B. Banfield, N. Holman)

R. M. Gawn, T. Goldstein (D. Cameron)

F: I. Heeney, J. Billings, M. Walters, D. Smith, J. Garlett, B. Fritsch (D. Venables, Z. Giles Langdon)

[crowls]

Nice team,  good depth on each line by have weaker m5 in cogs.
Great forward line strong back premos though Yeo role is unclear and may drop price significantly. 
i see gawn, goldy and DC as the best ruck line available.
Heeney only a question mark due to preseason disruption and i have lobb over Dev. 


Would be very comfortable starting Rd1 with your team though.  Well done

[smashbox]

Thanks! Just still considering starting Lycett as he has good JS until the bye with vardy out. Still think R2 is uncertain and trading him to Ryder post port's bye is a good option.

[PowerBug]

Thanks! Just still considering starting Lycett as he has good JS until the bye with vardy out. Still think R2 is uncertain and trading him to Ryder post port's bye is a good option.

It just makes sense to me to pick Lycett I know the feels. But then I go to this page and scroll to his career fantasy stats and the Games column worries me. There's no out if he mucks up, it's a $277k hole that can't be fixed. If he makes it through 10 games then guaranteed he will be an amazing pick.

The first team I made (last week) had him in it. No one else above 250k from that original side has left except for him.