To Ablett or not to Ablett

[Colty]

I downgraded Danger to Ablett - Whether he becomes Danger or not when Danger starts pumping out the scores remains to be sign.  Gazz also becomes a viable C option.

Really, if he produces vintage Gaz plus you've started Danger you are miles ahead of the curve imo.

[Nige]

Couldn't leave the great man out. Feels good to pick him with full confidence.

[Thewizz71]

Regardless of number of games played, what sort of scores should we realistically expect from the great man?

[GoLions]

As much as I want to bring him in...I just can't. Expecting him to be managed every now and then which will hurt coaches in the long run. Hope I'm wrong though!

[BB67th]

As much as I want to, I just can't bring myself to put him in my team. You can't be spending that much on a premium mid when you know in all likelihood they'll be playing under 18 games for the season.

[tkringle]

Hadn’t seen this article. Ablett saying he will be playing as a midfielder, not a forward

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/teams/geelong/gary-ablett-jnr-opens-up-on-his-goals-for-2018-and-wanting-his-father-back-at-the-cats/news-story/853f08156371c49b3b6c44d3471a9e9c

[RaisyDaisy]

Just a little LIFT to get things going

First one of the year lol

LIFT!

[smashbox]

Getting a lot of the ball now. Doing some nice things

[SilverLion]

If he gets 100+ I think his owners would be happy first off.

[Woppa15]

If he could lift his disposal efficiency a bit his score should lift easily. Only running at something like 47%

[AaronKirk]

If he could lift his disposal efficiency a bit his score should lift easily. Only running at something like 47%

Improved to 61% DE to end the game. 115 before scaling. I'm happy with that.

He copped a lot of attention as well and still had 39 touches. Get Danger back in the mids and he won't get as much.

[SilverLion]

If he could lift his disposal efficiency a bit his score should lift easily. Only running at something like 47%

Improved to 61% DE to end the game. 115 before scaling. I'm happy with that.

He copped a lot of attention as well and still had 39 touches. Get Danger back in the mids and he won't get as much.

As much attention? Or possessions? Or both?

[AaronKirk]

If he could lift his disposal efficiency a bit his score should lift easily. Only running at something like 47%

Improved to 61% DE to end the game. 115 before scaling. I'm happy with that.

He copped a lot of attention as well and still had 39 touches. Get Danger back in the mids and he won't get as much.

As much attention? Or possessions? Or both?

Maybe both but with Danger back he won't cop as much attention at stoppages IMO with Danger and Selwood both there along side him.

[Mongoose528]

If he could lift his disposal efficiency a bit his score should lift easily. Only running at something like 47%

Improved to 61% DE to end the game. 115 before scaling. I'm happy with that.

He copped a lot of attention as well and still had 39 touches. Get Danger back in the mids and he won't get as much.

8 clangers as well, could have been a monstrous score.

[Woppa15]

If he could lift his disposal efficiency a bit his score should lift easily. Only running at something like 47%

Improved to 61% DE to end the game. 115 before scaling. I'm happy with that.

He copped a lot of attention as well and still had 39 touches. Get Danger back in the mids and he won't get as much.

As much attention? Or possessions? Or both?

Maybe both but with Danger back he won't cop as much attention at stoppages IMO with Danger and Selwood both there along side him.

When Danger returns id expect slightly less possessions by resting forward but more goals.