Point Of Difference Players

Started by jricey, February 03, 2018, 11:19:52 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ben_020285

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 20, 2018, 05:29:19 PM
Quote from: ben_020285 on March 20, 2018, 05:18:19 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on March 20, 2018, 05:16:29 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 20, 2018, 04:55:16 PM
matt crouch keeps finding his way into my team
Hasn't moved from my team since my first draft ;)

At 11% he ain't no POD though.

I think anyone over 600k at 11% is still pretty unique

11 in 100 teams have him, so that says most weeks he is a POD for you

Nah, don't think the 8th most picked premium mid could be considered a POD.

Bully

Quote from: meow meow on March 20, 2018, 05:26:32 PM
The combo of Wingard, Gray, Dixon, Watts, Boak, Rockliff and Ryder is my POD fix. Tarps will be difficult to beat and look like their gamelan is high possession control of the ball. Rocky will be all over that shiz.

Fingers crossed I play you in round 10.  ;D

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: ben_020285 on March 20, 2018, 05:40:20 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 20, 2018, 05:29:19 PM
Quote from: ben_020285 on March 20, 2018, 05:18:19 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on March 20, 2018, 05:16:29 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 20, 2018, 04:55:16 PM
matt crouch keeps finding his way into my team
Hasn't moved from my team since my first draft ;)

At 11% he ain't no POD though.

I think anyone over 600k at 11% is still pretty unique

11 in 100 teams have him, so that says most weeks he is a POD for you

Nah, don't think the 8th most picked premium mid could be considered a POD.

I don't think the ranking (8th) really counts for that much though - 11% is 11%

Oliver is only 7% and that ranks him 11th. Surely 7% is a POD, but 11th most picked means he is not?

Potato, Potato I guess  :D


ben_020285

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 20, 2018, 05:52:30 PM
Quote from: ben_020285 on March 20, 2018, 05:40:20 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 20, 2018, 05:29:19 PM
Quote from: ben_020285 on March 20, 2018, 05:18:19 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on March 20, 2018, 05:16:29 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 20, 2018, 04:55:16 PM
matt crouch keeps finding his way into my team
Hasn't moved from my team since my first draft ;)

At 11% he ain't no POD though.

I think anyone over 600k at 11% is still pretty unique

11 in 100 teams have him, so that says most weeks he is a POD for you

Nah, don't think the 8th most picked premium mid could be considered a POD.

I don't think the ranking (8th) really counts for that much though - 11% is 11%

Oliver is only 7% and that ranks him 11th. Surely 7% is a POD, but 11th most picked means he is not?

Potato, Potato I guess  :D

Rightly or wrongly, the widely understood description of a POD in SC circles is less than 10% ownership which sounds about right to me.


Ringo


RaisyDaisy

Quote from: ben_020285 on March 20, 2018, 06:00:24 PM
Rightly or wrongly, the widely understood description of a POD in SC circles is less than 10% ownership which sounds about right to me.

Absolutely agree, although I feel as though 10% is actually still low. I think the fact that it's double digits is why most of us have always used it as the benchmark


Ringo

Personally I count 15% as cut off for Pods meaning that if you do the maths only 2/3 teams in your league on average should have the same POD. Does not always work though as the % ownership may show 15% but amongst we knowledegable or unknowledheable experts with our thoughts the dame POD ownership amongst FF members could be 25% plus.

Hazza09

What’s everyone’s opinion on Taberner?
Is this just a pre season fluke or has his position changed during the JLT series?
Was he in the ruck?
His average pre season is astonishing and at 325k he is tempting

frenzy

Quote from: Hazza09 on March 20, 2018, 10:13:35 PM
What’s everyone’s opinion on Taberner?
Is this just a pre season fluke or has his position changed during the JLT series?
Was he in the ruck?
His average pre season is astonishing and at 325k he is tempting

Didn't have many hitouts for a backup ruckman, considering big Sandi only played 50% TOG. But I think he just roamed around like a mobile ruckman, picking up possies at will. Could also be the lack of quality opponent imo.

Hazza09

Quote from: frenzy on March 20, 2018, 10:33:33 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on March 20, 2018, 10:13:35 PM
What’s everyone’s opinion on Taberner?
Is this just a pre season fluke or has his position changed during the JLT series?
Was he in the ruck?
His average pre season is astonishing and at 325k he is tempting

Didn't have many hitouts for a backup ruckman, considering big Sandi only played 50% TOG. But I think he just roamed around like a mobile ruckman, picking up possies at will. Could also be the lack of quality opponent imo.

So basically don’t bother? Hmm didn’t know Sandi only played 50% of that game

elephants

Quote from: meow meow on March 20, 2018, 05:26:32 PM
The combo of Wingard, Gray, Dixon, Watts, Boak, Rockliff and Ryder is my POD fix. Tarps will be difficult to beat and look like their gamelan is high possession control of the ball. Rocky will be all over that shiz.

I cant tell if this is brutal sarcasm, I am going to assume it is given you've said Gray who is suspended and Dixon who is an inaccurate spud :p

billnats

Lewis Taylor is my POD.

Doesn’t waste the footy. If he kicks a couple goals a week as well, he would easily be 90+ and I’ll take that.

Ringo

Quote from: billnats on March 21, 2018, 09:29:35 AM
Lewis Taylor is my POD.

Doesn’t waste the footy. If he kicks a couple goals a week as well, he would easily be 90+ and I’ll take that.
Nice as a Lions supporter he is on my radar but just waiting to see how he gels with Charlie Cameron and only so many points to go around to be shared amongst the smaills Zorko will obviously pull quite a few and then Bundy, Cameron and Taylor to share others.

jfitty

A question for you Brisbane fans, how's Beams' preseason been? Has he been training fully?

Noticed he's only in 4% of teams. Currently have Zorko but can definitely use the extra 50k in the bank by grabbing Beams instead.