Ownership Percentages

Started by RaisyDaisy, January 23, 2018, 01:40:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

frenzy


Ricochet

8 from RD's list. 3 being rooks

from Enzedder's list 3/3/2/2

frenzy

Dangerfield 24% and steadily dropping. Now  actually hoping he's not named Rnd 1, imagine Danger the POD.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: frenzy on March 16, 2018, 12:40:29 PM
Dangerfield 24% and steadily dropping. Now  actually hoping he's not named Rnd 1, imagine Danger the POD.

It's only dropping because people are playing around with their options without him

If he lines up Round 1 his ownership will soar back up

Nige

Quote from: SilverLion on January 28, 2018, 10:56:53 AM
Quote from: shaker on January 27, 2018, 02:00:09 PM
Quote from: GoLions on January 27, 2018, 01:56:00 PM
Quote from: shaker on January 27, 2018, 01:12:07 PM
Certainly a lot of very good players on low % ownership

C Ward  0.4
Z Smith  0.4
Duncan  0.5
Murphy  0.7
Heppell  0.9
D Shiel   1.0
T Adams 1.4
L Neale   1.6
JPK        2.5
Parker    2.6
Treloar   2.8
Jelwood  3.0
That's only up to 3% ownership there is plenty more PODS above that , might be the year of the POD  :)
Been considering Heppell tbh, think he could go 105-110, but hopefully 110 :p
Can't see any 2nd year players like Oliver this year so having some POD's seem the go
WitherGOAT
I like the way SilverLion thinks.

batt

Quote from: Nige on March 16, 2018, 01:27:20 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on January 28, 2018, 10:56:53 AM
WitherGOAT
I like the way SilverLion thinks.
When Dochers went down he transferred all his powers to WitherGOAT.

frenzy

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 16, 2018, 12:43:16 PM
Quote from: frenzy on March 16, 2018, 12:40:29 PM
Dangerfield 24% and steadily dropping. Now  actually hoping he's not named Rnd 1, imagine Danger the POD.

It's only dropping because people are playing around with their options without him

If he lines up Round 1 his ownership will soar back up

What do you think would be the better outcome in terms of having the biggest effect on his ownership, not named or late out?

I'll go not named, but the late out panick would hurt teams.

enzedder

Quote from: frenzy on March 16, 2018, 02:06:28 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 16, 2018, 12:43:16 PM
Quote from: frenzy on March 16, 2018, 12:40:29 PM
Dangerfield 24% and steadily dropping. Now  actually hoping he's not named Rnd 1, imagine Danger the POD.

It's only dropping because people are playing around with their options without him

If he lines up Round 1 his ownership will soar back up

What do you think would be the better outcome in terms of having the biggest effect on his ownership, not named or late out?

I'll go not named, but the late out panick would hurt teams.
He's in my team but if he's a late out he becomes Oliver. No panic. Already have a cunning plan.

Gigantor


dmac07

Treloar and Parker at under 3% are interesting. Both have that magic 'potential' to be 110+ players.

crowls

Quote from: dmac07 on March 16, 2018, 09:27:10 PM
Treloar and Parker at under 3% are interesting. Both have that magic 'potential' to be 110+ players.
Disagree,  Treloar lacks the finishing skills to increase past 110,   Parker I just have a bent against. See others as having higher ceilings, Bont, Oliver, Beams, Cripps etc

SilverLion

#41
Quote from: enzedder on January 29, 2018, 08:58:47 AM
$400k+ Players in their positions
Defenders
1. Laird 41.7             
2. Yeo 20.5               
3. Hibberd 19.3         
4. Hurley 13.7
5. Lloyd 10.9
6. Simpson 8.1
7. Hanley 7.2
8. Shaw 6.5
9. Touhy 5.6
10.Rance 5.5

Midfielders
1. Fyfe 42.2                       
2. Heeney 40.0 (FWD/MID)
3. Martin 37.9
4. Dangerfield 35.3
5. Mitchell 30.7                   
6. Cripps 25.2
7. Petracca 20.4 (FWD/MID)
8. Kelly 19.0                     
9. Dahlhaus 15.1 (FWD/MID)
10.Coniglio 15.1

Rucks
1. Gawn 55.1         
2. NicNat 50.4         
3. Ryder 6.4
4. Grundy 4.0
5. Kreuzer 3.8
6. Jacobs 3.8         
7. Nankervis 2.3
8. Martin 1.7
9. Goldstein 1.2
10.Pederson 1.1 (FWD/RUCK)

Forwards
1. Heeney 40.0 (MID/FWD)       
2. Petracca 20.4 (MID/FWD)     
3. Gray 17.0
4. Dahlhaus 15.1 (MID/FWD)   
5. Billings 14.0
6. Greene 13.6
7. Walters 10.1 (MID/FWD)
8. Franklin 9.7
9. Menegola 9.4 (MID/FWD)
10.Smith 7.1

According to the masses then the best or most popular premium players for each bye in their respective positions (ignoring Fwds available as Mids) are:

Round 12 - Yeo, Mitchell, NicNat, Dahlhaus
Round 13 - Hibberd, Kelly, Gawn, Petracca
Round 14 - Laird, Fyfe, Jacobs, Heeney

For Bye Balance this means that the safest picks in their respective positions are:

Defenders - Yeo, Hibberd and Laird. 
Midfielders - Mitchell, Kelly and Fyfe. 
Rucks - NicNat and Gawn.
Forwards - Dahlhaus, Petracca and Heeney.

Of the above 11 I will likely start only 5 or 6 of them: Hibberd, Laird, Mitchell, Fyfe, Gawn and possibly NicNat.

Thought I would just update NZ's list to see how things have changed as a result of the JLT. Unfortunately, I can only give exact %s, decimals aren't appearing for me. Sorry about that  :-[

Defenders
1. Laird 46%       
2. Hibberd 28%         
3. Sicily 17% (DEF/FWD)   
4. Yeo 16%
5. Lloyd 12%
6. Hurley 11%
7. Savage 9%
8. Rance 8%
9. Shaw 7%
10. Tuohy 7%

Saad @ 399,800 is at 7% also.

Midfielders
1. Fyfe 52%                     
2. Martin 49%
3. Mitchell 41%
4. Heeney 35% (MID/FWD)
5. Petracca 29% (MID/FWD)                 
6. Cripps 26%
7. Coniglio 21%
8. Dangerfield 21%                   
9. Kelly 21%
10. Bontempelli 12%

Rucks
1. Gawn 61%         
2. NicNat 18%         
3. Ryder 12%
4. Martin 10%
5. Nankervis 8%
6. Jacobs 7%       
7. Kreuzer 6%
8. Grundy 6%
9. Goldstein 5%
10. Sandilands 3%


Forwards
1. Heeney 35% (MID/FWD)       
2. Petracca 29% (MID/FWD)     
3. Smith 25%
4. Franklin 21%
5. Billings 20%
6. Sicily 17% (DEF/FWD)
7. Greene 15%
8. Dahlhaus 11% (MID/FWD)
9. Walters 11% (MID/FWD)
10. R. Gray 10% (Isn't he suspended rd. 1?)

Bully

Goldstein at 5% is staggering but I'll take it.  :)

frenzy

Quote from: Bully on March 17, 2018, 08:38:11 PM
Goldstein at 5% is staggering but I'll take it.  :)

The Preuss factor working a treat.   ;)

hawkers65