Player X vs. Player Y

[enzedder]

Billings vs Heeney

I'm going Billings. Heeney not doing a full preseason means I'll look to him as an upgrade target

Same.
As for some of the others recently discussed...
Gray - No, doughnut R10, see how he is being played and scoring after that.
Hanley - as above.
Barlow - as above.
Cripps is a powerhouse. If he stays on the park he will be one of the picks of the season IMO. Screams value.

[Mantis]

Can I get some opinions on

Dusty + Barlow + 102K Defensive rookie (Mirra)
vs
Beams + Gray + O'Shea

(Personally leaning towards the second option) Already have Danger, Titch, Fyfe with Bont, Cripps for some VC, C options

[js19]

Can I get some opinions on

Dusty + Barlow + 102K Defensive rookie (Mirra)
vs
Beams + Gray + O'Shea

(Personally leaning towards the second option) Already have Danger, Titch, Fyfe with Bont, Cripps for some VC, C options

Stacked mids. Probably #2 for me, but I'm avoiding Barlow and Gray due to the rd9 bye

[Ringo]

Can I get some opinions on

Dusty + Barlow + 102K Defensive rookie (Mirra)
vs
Beams + Gray + O'Shea

(Personally leaning towards the second option) Already have Danger, Titch, Fyfe with Bont, Cripps for some VC, C options

2nd option as well - If you go Dusty you 4 mid prems with the dreaded Rd 14 bye.  Ensure you have cover for Rd 10 though.

[SilverLion]

Can I get some opinions on

Dusty + Barlow + 102K Defensive rookie (Mirra)
vs
Beams + Gray + O'Shea

(Personally leaning towards the second option) Already have Danger, Titch, Fyfe with Bont, Cripps for some VC, C options

2nd option as well - If you go Dusty you 4 mid prems with the dreaded Rd 14 bye.  Ensure you have cover for Rd 10 though.

Agreed, would go Billings/Dahlhaus instead of Gray though.

[Corkascrew]

ok so tossing up between
option a: jake lloyd, coniglio, billings
option b: nathan wilson, hannebry, de goey
option c: hanley, pendelbury, lobb
leaning towards option a but like option b as more pod

[Dons]

ok so tossing up between
option a: jake lloyd, coniglio, billings
option b: nathan wilson, hannebry, de goey
option c: hanley, pendelbury, lobb
leaning towards option a but like option b as more pod

Hanners is currently injured, Wilson and JDG both speculative picks in my eyes, neither has averaged near premium level before. A then C for me, don't like B at all.

[shaker]

Probably option A for me , I was keen on Hanners myself till it come out this week he has done a calf

[enzedder]

We're all over a.

[Mantis]

Cheers for the replies, already got Billings but will consider Gray vs Dalhouse. Just worried how Maclean will affect Dal’s role. Guess same could be said with rocky and gray.

Re the last I prefer A clearly. 2 keepers with. Possible third and coniglio appears to be some value

[SilverLion]

We're all over a.

[Mantis]

Apologies if this has already been done

Beams
vs
Bont

Struggling with this one, Beams could go huge with a strong preseason behind him but obviously the injury concern. Feel like Bont will improve on last season. Can only fit 1 atm. Danger, Dusty, Titch, Fyfe, Cripps are my other mids.

[quinny88]

Apologies if this has already been done

Beams
vs
Bont

Struggling with this one, Beams could go huge with a strong preseason behind him but obviously the injury concern. Feel like Bont will improve on last season. Can only fit 1 atm. Danger, Dusty, Titch, Fyfe, Cripps are my other mids.

That is really tough. I like them both
Probably Beams with the runs on the board

[SilverLion]

Apologies if this has already been done

Beams
vs
Bont

Struggling with this one, Beams could go huge with a strong preseason behind him but obviously the injury concern. Feel like Bont will improve on last season. Can only fit 1 atm. Danger, Dusty, Titch, Fyfe, Cripps are my other mids.

Beams. Cheaper and I think higher ceiling. Does come with more injury risk though.

[tommy10]

We're all over a.