Player X vs. Player Y

Started by SilverLion, January 20, 2018, 10:20:34 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

SilverLion

Quote from: enzedder on January 22, 2018, 09:47:35 AM
Billings for mine as well. Having another great pre season apparently as opposed to Greene with his little toe issue. Throw in Greene's history of suspension and the difference of 19k in Billings' favour and we have a clear winner.
+1

Money Shot

Yeo v Laird v Hibberd... rank them.

enzedder


Gigantor

Quote from: enzedder on January 22, 2018, 11:56:15 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 11:31:38 AM
Yeo v Laird v Hibberd... rank them.
Laird > Hibberd > Yeo

I agree with this but I think Yeo has the highest risk/reward, could average anywhere from 85-105

Money Shot

Quote from: Gigantor on January 22, 2018, 12:04:07 PM
Quote from: enzedder on January 22, 2018, 11:56:15 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 11:31:38 AM
Yeo v Laird v Hibberd... rank them.
Laird > Hibberd > Yeo

I agree with this but I think Yeo has the highest risk/reward, could average anywhere from 85-105
Laird and Hibberd would both be decent chances of averaging 105 though wouldn't they?

Gigantor

Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 12:16:00 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 22, 2018, 12:04:07 PM
Quote from: enzedder on January 22, 2018, 11:56:15 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 11:31:38 AM
Yeo v Laird v Hibberd... rank them.
Laird > Hibberd > Yeo

I agree with this but I think Yeo has the highest risk/reward, could average anywhere from 85-105
Laird and Hibberd would both be decent chances of averaging 105 though wouldn't they?

Yeah they could, what I'm trying say is I think Yeo has the highest ceiling of the three but probably has the lowest floor as well

Money Shot

Quote from: Gigantor on January 22, 2018, 12:26:03 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 12:16:00 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 22, 2018, 12:04:07 PM
Quote from: enzedder on January 22, 2018, 11:56:15 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 11:31:38 AM
Yeo v Laird v Hibberd... rank them.
Laird > Hibberd > Yeo

I agree with this but I think Yeo has the highest risk/reward, could average anywhere from 85-105
Laird and Hibberd would both be decent chances of averaging 105 though wouldn't they?

Yeah they could, what I'm trying say is I think Yeo has the highest ceiling of the three but probably has the lowest floor as well
Yeah fair enough, I'm inclined to agree.

enzedder

Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 12:28:05 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 22, 2018, 12:26:03 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 12:16:00 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 22, 2018, 12:04:07 PM
Quote from: enzedder on January 22, 2018, 11:56:15 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 11:31:38 AM
Yeo v Laird v Hibberd... rank them.
Laird > Hibberd > Yeo

I agree with this but I think Yeo has the highest risk/reward, could average anywhere from 85-105
Laird and Hibberd would both be decent chances of averaging 105 though wouldn't they?

Yeah they could, what I'm trying say is I think Yeo has the highest ceiling of the three but probably has the lowest floor as well
Yeah fair enough, I'm inclined to agree.
Weigh in starting price as well and Yeo isn't as appealing.
Laird is the first picked defender for most I think.

Money Shot

Quote from: enzedder on January 22, 2018, 01:51:29 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 12:28:05 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 22, 2018, 12:26:03 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 12:16:00 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 22, 2018, 12:04:07 PM
Quote from: enzedder on January 22, 2018, 11:56:15 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 11:31:38 AM
Yeo v Laird v Hibberd... rank them.
Laird > Hibberd > Yeo

I agree with this but I think Yeo has the highest risk/reward, could average anywhere from 85-105
Laird and Hibberd would both be decent chances of averaging 105 though wouldn't they?

Yeah they could, what I'm trying say is I think Yeo has the highest ceiling of the three but probably has the lowest floor as well
Yeah fair enough, I'm inclined to agree.
Weigh in starting price as well and Yeo isn't as appealing.
Laird is the first picked defender for most I think.
Yeah my current team has $900 left over and although I have some decent priced rookies if i need money from somewhere Yeo is the first to go for Hibberd.

SilverLion

Quote from: Money Shot on January 22, 2018, 11:31:38 AM
Yeo v Laird v Hibberd... rank them.

Laird>>>Hibberd>Yeo
Reliable>Less reliable>Least reliable

Fid

My concern with Hibberd is the inclusion of Lever into the side

LordSneeze

I believe that Gibbs might impact Lairdf more than Lever impacts Hibberd. Both are pretty much solid choices as top 6 defenders.
Yeo should be too, but there is always the question mark over what his role will be.

SilverLion

Quote from: LordSneeze on January 23, 2018, 10:16:55 AM
I believe that Gibbs might impact Lairdf more than Lever impacts Hibberd. Both are pretty much solid choices as top 6 defenders.
Yeo should be too, but there is always the question mark over what his role will be.
Not so sure on the Gibbs impact tbh, no Smith/Lever this year so any points Gibbs get across HB will likely just come out of the points that they would have gotten, rather than Laird's.

LordSneeze

Quote from: SilverLion on January 23, 2018, 11:02:56 AM
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 23, 2018, 10:16:55 AM
I believe that Gibbs might impact Lairdf more than Lever impacts Hibberd. Both are pretty much solid choices as top 6 defenders.
Yeo should be too, but there is always the question mark over what his role will be.
Not so sure on the Gibbs impact tbh, no Smith/Lever this year so any points Gibbs get across HB will likely just come out of the points that they would have gotten, rather than Laird's.

The Crows were the highest PPG team in the league, by quite a margin. Neither Lever or Smith were prolific scorers so I really don't believe that is where Gibbs will get his points from.

Sabretooth Tigers

 ::)

Liberatore  V  Coniglio.