Which players can average 120+ in 2018

[quinny88]

Not a chance in hell Gibbs could average 120+

Wouldn't be a bad pick but look at the players with that bye. Plus I keep hearing people saying he will spend a lot of time at half back. Think even Sam Jacobs mentioned it in his interview last week

[meow meow]

Not a chance in hell Gibbs could average 120+

Wouldn't be a bad pick but look at the players with that bye. Plus I keep hearing people saying he will spend a lot of time at half back. Think even Sam Jacobs mentioned it in his interview last week

Docherty did alright at half back. Gilbee averaged 118 there. Kornes 120.

[meow meow]

Not much love for Oliver around here. What he's done so far is amazing.

[shaker]

Not a chance in hell Gibbs could average 120+

Wouldn't be a bad pick but look at the players with that bye. Plus I keep hearing people saying he will spend a lot of time at half back. Think even Sam Jacobs mentioned it in his interview last week

Docherty did alright at half back. Gilbee averaged 118 there. Kornes 120.

Plus Gibbs has to come to grips with the Tex Walker power rangers stance before game no chance

[Peter]

Nathan Brown - far bigger chance than Logan Austin

[Gandalf123]

Grape is the only player who will go 120+ in 2018.

+1

[enzedder]

112.1 AFL fantasy average, and capable of monster scores like 208 in SC when he feels like it. Finally in a good team. Look out.

Rocky?

Rocky has never scored 208. His best is a pitiful 204.

Youve got me stumped then haha

Gibbs i assume :p

Logan Austin

Nathan Brown - far bigger chance than Logan Austin

Nathan Brown has been in a good team for a while. Finally, Logan Austin is too. Scored 208 pts one day in under 12s

[quinny88]

Not a chance in hell Gibbs could average 120+

Wouldn't be a bad pick but look at the players with that bye. Plus I keep hearing people saying he will spend a lot of time at half back. Think even Sam Jacobs mentioned it in his interview last week

Docherty did alright at half back. Gilbee averaged 118 there. Kornes 120.

So 1 player has? ever?
I don't see Gibbs being the 2nd to do it.
Sloane is the one at Adelaide that could. Would require him not to be tagged though

[Sabretooth Tigers]

 :)

G Ablett
P Dangerfield
D Martin
T Mitchell
N Fyfe
M Gawn   (ave 118 in 2016)

Wouldn't be surprised to see any of these ave 120

[Money Shot]

An interesting fact about Matt Crouch is he only had 77% time on ground (TOG) compared to the likes Danger, Dusty, Titch and Fyfe who all had 85% TOG.

If he ups his time on ground by 10% which wouldn't be unreasonable he could get an extra 3 possessions a game and therefore an extra 10 points bringing him to a 120 average.

Does anyone know why he had a lower time on ground than most of the elite supercoach midfielders? Would it be due to the fact he doesn't seem to be strong enough to rest forward where as those mentioned above can?

[Holz]

An interesting fact about Matt Crouch is he only had 77% time on ground (TOG) compared to the likes Danger, Dusty, Titch and Fyfe who all had 85% TOG.

If he ups his time on ground by 10% which wouldn't be unreasonable he could get an extra 3 possessions a game and therefore an extra 10 points bringing him to a 120 average.

Does anyone know why he had a lower time on ground than most of the elite supercoach midfielders? Would it be due to the fact he doesn't seem to be strong enough to rest forward where as those mentioned above can?

Just taking a guess but perhaps its the fact the crows have good small forwards already and he sits on the bench rather then resting up forward.

Matt Crouch: 77%
Brad Crouch: 75%
Sloane 80%
Greenwood 65%

based on that i wouldn't expect it to rise especially with Gibbs coming in.

All Matt needs to do is keep up close to his post bye form though and he will be a great pick, he doesnt need to increase his TOG as he put up 120+ already for half a year.

I dont think he keeps it up though and id punt on 105-110 but i could certainly be wrong.

Id bank none of the crows go 120 but i can see 2-3 going 110+

[Money Shot]

An interesting fact about Matt Crouch is he only had 77% time on ground (TOG) compared to the likes Danger, Dusty, Titch and Fyfe who all had 85% TOG.

If he ups his time on ground by 10% which wouldn't be unreasonable he could get an extra 3 possessions a game and therefore an extra 10 points bringing him to a 120 average.

Does anyone know why he had a lower time on ground than most of the elite supercoach midfielders? Would it be due to the fact he doesn't seem to be strong enough to rest forward where as those mentioned above can?

Just taking a guess but perhaps its the fact the crows have good small forwards already and he sits on the bench rather then resting up forward.

Matt Crouch: 77%
Brad Crouch: 75%
Sloane 80%
Greenwood 65%

based on that i wouldn't expect it to rise especially with Gibbs coming in.

All Matt needs to do is keep up close to his post bye form though and he will be a great pick, he doesnt need to increase his TOG as he put up 120+ already for half a year.

I dont think he keeps it up though and id punt on 105-110 but i could certainly be wrong.

Id bank none of the crows go 120 but i can see 2-3 going 110+

So you expect a 15-20 ppg drop off from his post bye average?

[Grufflez]

tbh 120 is the magic number in SC.
Not many guys reach it, if you had said 115 that's a different story and possible for the premo eilites in a good year.

Id say Danger with Fyfe & Ablett outside chances.

[crowls]

tbh 120 is the magic number in SC.
Not many guys reach it, if you had said 115 that's a different story and possible for the premo eilites in a good year.

Id say Danger with Fyfe & Ablett outside chances.

with you gruff.   not many get to 120 and few repeat it.     so danger, god and fyfe are my most likely.   bont as an outsider if he plays mid all season.

[Holz]

An interesting fact about Matt Crouch is he only had 77% time on ground (TOG) compared to the likes Danger, Dusty, Titch and Fyfe who all had 85% TOG.

If he ups his time on ground by 10% which wouldn't be unreasonable he could get an extra 3 possessions a game and therefore an extra 10 points bringing him to a 120 average.

Does anyone know why he had a lower time on ground than most of the elite supercoach midfielders? Would it be due to the fact he doesn't seem to be strong enough to rest forward where as those mentioned above can?

Just taking a guess but perhaps its the fact the crows have good small forwards already and he sits on the bench rather then resting up forward.

Matt Crouch: 77%
Brad Crouch: 75%
Sloane 80%
Greenwood 65%

based on that i wouldn't expect it to rise especially with Gibbs coming in.

All Matt needs to do is keep up close to his post bye form though and he will be a great pick, he doesnt need to increase his TOG as he put up 120+ already for half a year.

I dont think he keeps it up though and id punt on 105-110 but i could certainly be wrong.

Id bank none of the crows go 120 but i can see 2-3 going 110+

So you expect a 15-20 ppg drop off from his post bye average?

fair call ill change to 107-112