Top 2/5 rucks, 2018 Thread

Started by Money Shot, January 11, 2018, 10:58:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

enzedder

Quote from: SilverLion on April 15, 2018, 12:50:00 PM
Atm I see the breakdown of the rucks like this:

Need at least one of:
Gawn
Grundy

Good R2s:
Martin
Nankervis
Naitanui
Witts

Solid R2s:
Sinclair
McEvoy
Jacobs
Goldstein
Sandilands
Kreuzer

English a great R3 for those that have him.

Jury still out on Lycett.

Need a couple of weeks from Ryder when he's back to know where he sits.
Atm that's probably about right SL but Grundy may well be a must have soon.
Those in the second tier might look second rate in about 3-5 weeks at Grundy's present form.
NN could be the exception as he builds fitness and if he plays more game time.

Torpedo10

Are we seriously looking at a bad match or two and making judgments off that?

The only reason I'd trade a proven premium is if there was an even priced player scoring significantly better, so unless you can afford the 100k, you're probably better waiting for the inevitable bad Grundy game, or the good run Goldy will have next month.  :P

tkringle

Goldy will dropp to ~$495K and falling given he will have a 57 and 76 in his rolling BE.

Will be $100K and change to swap to Grundy, so its now or might struggle to bring Grundy in later..

Tempted by the potential of Nic Nat as well, given how he is scoring with limited game time. Almost a straight swap for Goldy..




Bully

Quote from: tkringle on April 15, 2018, 01:12:27 PM
Goldy will dropp to ~$495K and falling given he will have a 57 and 76 in his rolling BE.

Will be $100K and change to swap to Grundy, so its now or might struggle to bring Grundy in later..

Tempted by the potential of Nic Nat as well, given how he is scoring with limited game time. Almost a straight swap for Goldy..

Goldy goneski, will get Grundy

AaronKirk

Quote from: Torpedo10 on April 15, 2018, 01:11:38 PM
Are we seriously looking at a bad match or two and making judgments off that?

The only reason I'd trade a proven premium is if there was an even priced player scoring significantly better, so unless you can afford the 100k, you're probably better waiting for the inevitable bad Grundy game, or the good run Goldy will have next month.  :P

Goldy looks cooked. Kreuz still massively struggling with his groins and Goldy only broke even in ruck contests in a game which North dominated.

He needs to improve dramatically or I'll be moving him on within in the next few weeks.

HoleMeal

Quote from: AaronKirk on April 15, 2018, 01:37:37 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on April 15, 2018, 01:11:38 PM
Are we seriously looking at a bad match or two and making judgments off that?

The only reason I'd trade a proven premium is if there was an even priced player scoring significantly better, so unless you can afford the 100k, you're probably better waiting for the inevitable bad Grundy game, or the good run Goldy will have next month.  :P

Goldy looks cooked. Kreuz still massively struggling with his groins and Goldy only broke even in ruck contests in a game which North dominated.

He needs to improve dramatically or I'll be moving him on within in the next few weeks.
Agree 110% I watched him closely as I have him at R2. Rucked most of the game and JUST broke even. Daw didn't even take any points from him.
Add to that Scott's negative comments and unfortunately it's a sideways to Grundy for me.

Adamant

But I thought Goldy was over his off-field struggles and would be back to his best this year?

Bully

Quote from: Adamant on April 15, 2018, 02:46:21 PM
But I thought Goldy was over his off-field struggles and would be back to his best this year?

Clearly not, on the bright side it provides an opportunity to get Grundy.

Torpedo10

Quote from: Adamant on April 15, 2018, 02:46:21 PM
But I thought Goldy was over his off-field struggles and would be back to his best this year?
I did too. :(

Holz

Just some advice.

I have dangerfield and goldy.

Goldy is averaging 5 points under his price and dangerfield is averaging 25+ points under his price.

The correct move is to drop danger right?

SilverLion

Quote from: Holz on April 15, 2018, 08:15:02 PM
Just some advice.

I have dangerfield and goldy.

Goldy is averaging 5 points under his price and dangerfield is averaging 25+ points under his price.

The correct move is to drop danger right?
That's certainly one way to look at it.

Bully

Quote from: Holz on April 15, 2018, 08:15:02 PM
Just some advice.

I have dangerfield and goldy.

Goldy is averaging 5 points under his price and dangerfield is averaging 25+ points under his price.

The correct move is to drop danger right?

Danger is averaging 111, price irrelevant as he will be a top 10 mid. Goldy no chance to be a top 2 ruck, looks a shadow of his former self.

Gavdroid

Quote from: Holz on April 15, 2018, 08:15:02 PM
Just some advice.

I have dangerfield and goldy.

Goldy is averaging 5 points under his price and dangerfield is averaging 25+ points under his price.

The correct move is to drop danger right?

That's just silly. Danger doesn't have two scores under 80 and a sub 100 average. Price makes no difference.

Goldy also has a clearly better option to replace him with, Dangerfield doesn't

Southstorm

Quote from: Bully on April 15, 2018, 08:26:41 PM
Quote from: Holz on April 15, 2018, 08:15:02 PM
Just some advice.

I have dangerfield and goldy.

Goldy is averaging 5 points under his price and dangerfield is averaging 25+ points under his price.

The correct move is to drop danger right?

Danger is averaging 111, price irrelevant as he will be a top 10 mid. Goldy no chance to be a top 2 ruck, looks a shadow of his former self.

Adamant

All I can say is Goldy owners are just lucky that Preuss hasn't been setting the world on fire in the 2s, otherwise his ass would be getting dropped.