To Danger, or Not to Danger

[jvalles69]

Pretty certain I'll just start Ablett, and then as soon as he misses a game , make the switch to Danger

Reckon Ablett will come out firing and he is the only player in the comp who has the ability to go 125+ other than Danger (Excluding Fyfe that we all have anyway)

If Ablett plays!  I'm going next best option in Titch, and might use the extra cash to upgrade Libba to Cripps

[Money Shot]

I told my self I would keep Danger so I have too now.

Obviously missing out on 50 or so points from a rookie too Matty Crouch isn't ideal but Danger as a pod from next round onwards is going to be amazing.

If he was going to miss a game in round 10 you wouldn't trade him out so why do it now is my theory.

[Trindacut]

After all of my song and dance about Danger, I dropped him for Cripps and am keeping a few hundred K on the bench to make it a single trade for the first faltering mid of the year.

With a hamstring injury, and Danger's history of being a bit over dramatic with his injuries, and missing at least Round 1, it's just too likely that he'll drop in price too. It's worth risking a week or two of his return from the injury anyway.

[GoLions]

Locked.

[Bully]

Danger down to 19%, Dusty up to 54%. Reckon I'm gonna hold & go the double shot with Banfield & Holman. Worst case is I lose 80 points (140 - 60). For those who picked Zerrett it's a 40 loss, for those who picked Crouch only a 40 point gain. 

[Trindacut]

Danger down to 19%, Dusty up to 54%. Reckon I'm gonna hold & go the double shot with Banfield & Holman. Worst case is I lose 80 points (140 - 60). For those who picked Zerrett it's a 40 loss, for those who picked Crouch only a 40 point gain.

Those that picked Cripps..... 100 point gain :p

[Bully]

Danger down to 19%, Dusty up to 54%. Reckon I'm gonna hold & go the double shot with Banfield & Holman. Worst case is I lose 80 points (140 - 60). For those who picked Zerrett it's a 40 loss, for those who picked Crouch only a 40 point gain.

Those that picked Cripps..... 100 point gain :p

130 - 60 = 70 points

[Holz]

Danger down to 19%, Dusty up to 54%. Reckon I'm gonna hold & go the double shot with Banfield & Holman. Worst case is I lose 80 points (140 - 60). For those who picked Zerrett it's a 40 loss, for those who picked Crouch only a 40 point gain.

Your forgeting the points from the 150k. Unless people kept the cash in the bank to bring in danger next week which is silly.

[Ricochet]

Danger down to 19%, Dusty up to 54%. Reckon I'm gonna hold & go the double shot with Banfield & Holman. Worst case is I lose 80 points (140 - 60). For those who picked Zerrett it's a 40 loss, for those who picked Crouch only a 40 point gain.

Your forgeting the points from the 150k. Unless people kept the cash in the bank to bring in danger next week which is silly.

If you didn't keep cash to bring in Danger eventually then you'll struggle to bring him in any time soon

[RaisyDaisy]

Danger down to 19%, Dusty up to 54%. Reckon I'm gonna hold & go the double shot with Banfield & Holman. Worst case is I lose 80 points (140 - 60). For those who picked Zerrett it's a 40 loss, for those who picked Crouch only a 40 point gain.

Your forgeting the points from the 150k. Unless people kept the cash in the bank to bring in danger next week which is silly.

If you didn't keep cash to bring in Danger eventually then you'll struggle to bring him in any time soon

Pretty much the only reason I am starting Brayshaw and one of Bell/Bundy

Downgrade one of them to get the cash I need to get Danger

Costs me a trade, but worth it I think

[Woppa15]

Danger down to 19%, Dusty up to 54%. Reckon I'm gonna hold & go the double shot with Banfield & Holman. Worst case is I lose 80 points (140 - 60). For those who picked Zerrett it's a 40 loss, for those who picked Crouch only a 40 point gain.

Your forgeting the points from the 150k. Unless people kept the cash in the bank to bring in danger next week which is silly.

If you didn't keep cash to bring in Danger eventually then you'll struggle to bring him in any time soon

What if you aren’t running a non playing rookie at M11 so don’t have a ‘double bite’ at fielding the best rookie score? Would you still hold Danger on the bench for a week, possibly two?

[Ricochet]

Danger down to 19%, Dusty up to 54%. Reckon I'm gonna hold & go the double shot with Banfield & Holman. Worst case is I lose 80 points (140 - 60). For those who picked Zerrett it's a 40 loss, for those who picked Crouch only a 40 point gain.

Your forgeting the points from the 150k. Unless people kept the cash in the bank to bring in danger next week which is silly.

If you didn't keep cash to bring in Danger eventually then you'll struggle to bring him in any time soon

What if you aren’t running a non playing rookie at M11 so don’t have a ‘double bite’ at fielding the best rookie score? Would you still hold Danger on the bench for a week, possibly two?

I wouldn't but I'm not starting Danger.

[shaker]

Danger down to 19%, Dusty up to 54%. Reckon I'm gonna hold & go the double shot with Banfield & Holman. Worst case is I lose 80 points (140 - 60). For those who picked Zerrett it's a 40 loss, for those who picked Crouch only a 40 point gain.

Your forgeting the points from the 150k. Unless people kept the cash in the bank to bring in danger next week which is silly.

If you didn't keep cash to bring in Danger eventually then you'll struggle to bring him in any time soon

Pretty much the only reason I am starting Brayshaw and one of Bell/Bundy

Downgrade one of them to get the cash I need to get Danger

Costs me a trade, but worth it I think

I started Cripps instead and left the cash in the bank so I'm hoping someone like O'Meara has a good start and Danger has a quieter start currently with O'Meara's starting price and cash in bank just shy of 600K so one trade possible if all goes to plan if not and Danger comes out firing I will bite the bullet and get him anyway.

[Marstar]

If you are only interested in mini-League then keeping Danger will be a massive POD.

There are no head to head matches this week. So nothing is lost.

Add to that, if those without take him as the 1st upgrade target then that could be 6 weeks before they start banking his scores, otherwise it's a correction trade or 2 to bring him in earlier (trades that will be handy come finals).

[tommy10]

Danger down to 19%, Dusty up to 54%. Reckon I'm gonna hold & go the double shot with Banfield & Holman. Worst case is I lose 80 points (140 - 60). For those who picked Zerrett it's a 40 loss, for those who picked Crouch only a 40 point gain.

Your forgeting the points from the 150k. Unless people kept the cash in the bank to bring in danger next week which is silly.

If you didn't keep cash to bring in Danger eventually then you'll struggle to bring him in any time soon

What if you aren’t running a non playing rookie at M11 so don’t have a ‘double bite’ at fielding the best rookie score? Would you still hold Danger on the bench for a week, possibly two?

I wouldn't but I'm not starting Danger.

+1