Kelly V's Martin

[quinny88]

Haha! I do see his mug everytime I'm hungover and get a Powerade.

I don't trust any of the Sydney mids though, they are all over the shop and there's too many of them, especially with Heeney and Mills on the rise. I rather wait and see which ones are performing and go after them

[meow meow]

What do you drink? Must be good shower if you see him on Powerade instead of Gatorade.

[shaker]

Well I drink neither hence having no clue who the flower the grape was ha ha  :P

[Peter]

Martin, based on 2017 scores. Look at how is SC scores were made during games. Champion Data love him

[eaglesman]

How is this a thread.

[SilverLion]

Martin, but Titch and Fyfe over both of them.

[Holz]

How is this a thread.

100 105 108 120

v

69 69 87 114

what looks more solid.

[GoLions]

How is this a thread.

100 105 108 120

v

69 69 87 114

what looks more solid.

The 2nd one surely

[enzedder]

How is this a thread.

100 105 108 120

v

69 69 87 114

what looks more solid.

The 2nd one surely

Yes Martin ... I agree... but in fairness those SC averages are both players' last four seasons and Kelly's only four seasons.
Martin's first 4 seasons were...

78 99 89 102

2017 was Martin's eighth season and the only one he's had where he has averaged more than the 114 average that Kelly achieved in his fourth.
That being said, how good will Kelly be in his 5th?

[Holz]

How is this a thread.

100 105 108 120

v

69 69 87 114

what looks more solid.

The 2nd one surely

Yes Martin ... I agree... but in fairness those SC averages are both players' last four seasons and Kelly's only four seasons.
Martin's first 4 seasons were...

78 99 89 102

2017 was Martin's eighth season and the only one he's had where he has averaged more than the 114 average that Kelly achieved in his fourth.
That being said, how good will Kelly be in his 5th?

Treloar 83 87 107 106 111 then 101
Bont 79 103 107 then 105
Zerrett 64 88 111 then 109
Heppell 84 84 91 106 then 104

long story short.

I expect 105-110 from Kelly which is would put him in the top 20 mids so solid enough but just too pricey.

the question is not Martin v Kelly

its Kelly v Titchell v Zorko v Crouch v Sloane etc..

Danger Dusty Fyfe my 3 locks.

[quinny88]

How is this a thread.

100 105 108 120

v

69 69 87 114

what looks more solid.

The 2nd one surely

Yes Martin ... I agree... but in fairness those SC averages are both players' last four seasons and Kelly's only four seasons.
Martin's first 4 seasons were...

78 99 89 102

2017 was Martin's eighth season and the only one he's had where he has averaged more than the 114 average that Kelly achieved in his fourth.
That being said, how good will Kelly be in his 5th?

Treloar 83 87 107 106 111 then 101
Bont 79 103 107 then 105
Zerrett 64 88 111 then 109
Heppell 84 84 91 106 then 104

long story short.

I expect 105-110 from Kelly which is would put him in the top 20 mids so solid enough but just too pricey.

the question is not Martin v Kelly

its Kelly v Titchell v Zorko v Crouch v Sloane etc..

Danger Dusty Fyfe my 3 locks.

Cant argue with those 3 locks however they do share the same bye so it probably rules out others such as Sloane, Crouch, any of the Sydney mids, Selwood etc until after their bye

[Money Shot]

I can't see why Kelly wouldn't back up last seasons efforts going 110+ again. He is only going to get better and GWS are going to be tougher and tougher to beat as they are hitting there prime now.

Although I see Martin being the better pick for what it is worth.

Danger, Fyfe, Mitchell, Martin and Kelly are my top 5 this season in that order.

[Peter]

I think Cripps will be close to Kelly as will be main mid in weaker team, rather than one if four in top side. Can always pick up later

[Grufflez]

I can't see why Kelly wouldn't back up last seasons efforts going 110+ again. He is only going to get better and GWS are going to be tougher and tougher to beat as they are hitting there prime now.

Although I see Martin being the better pick for what it is worth.

Danger, Fyfe, Mitchell, Martin and Kelly are my top 5 this season in that order.

Whitfield & hopper rising, Cognilio if fit all season.
Be rare for a breakout player not to go backwards a touch the year after anyway.

[Money Shot]

I can't see why Kelly wouldn't back up last seasons efforts going 110+ again. He is only going to get better and GWS are going to be tougher and tougher to beat as they are hitting there prime now.

Although I see Martin being the better pick for what it is worth.

Danger, Fyfe, Mitchell, Martin and Kelly are my top 5 this season in that order.

Whitfield & hopper rising, Cognilio if fit all season.
Be rare for a breakout player not to go backwards a touch the year after anyway.

Kelly averaged 123.7 when Coniglio played last season so I think him going 110+ is more than likely.

As for Whitfield and Hopper they can take Stevie J and Devon Smith's points.