Injured Players Thread 2018 Year

[AaronKirk]

Pearce Hanley has slid behind the goals  trying to touch a ball over the line and has dislocated his shoulder.

The Suns docs managed to pop it straight back in but he has gone off the field.

[Bully]

Pearce Hanley has slid behind the goals  trying to touch a ball over the line and has dislocated his shoulder.

The Suns docs managed to pop it straight back in but he has gone off the field.

Best to steer clear I think.

[tkringle]

Pearce Hanley has slid behind the goals  trying to touch a ball over the line and has dislocated his shoulder.

The Suns docs managed to pop it straight back in but he has gone off the field.

Best to steer clear I think.

[Ringo]

This one not really SC relevant with less than 1% ownership but hard luck for him and may open way for Sam Murray now to definitely start.

Tom Browne is reporting the Tyson Goldsack has ruptured his ACL and will miss the entire 2018 season. Best wishes to Tyson on his recovery!

[iZander]

This one not really SC relevant with less than 1% ownership but hard luck for him and may open way for Sam Murray now to definitely start.

Tom Browne is reporting the Tyson Goldsack has ruptured his ACL and will miss the entire 2018 season. Best wishes to Tyson on his recovery!

I was sure you were about to say scherenberg :/

Bad luck to goldsack, wasnt he playing forward though?

[RaisyDaisy]

This one not really SC relevant with less than 1% ownership but hard luck for him and may open way for Sam Murray now to definitely start.

Tom Browne is reporting the Tyson Goldsack has ruptured his ACL and will miss the entire 2018 season. Best wishes to Tyson on his recovery!

I was sure you were about to say scherenberg :/

Bad luck to goldsack, wasnt he playing forward though?

Money bags is their utility - they play him all over the ground really

[Nige]

This one not really SC relevant with less than 1% ownership but hard luck for him and may open way for Sam Murray now to definitely start.

Tom Browne is reporting the Tyson Goldsack has ruptured his ACL and will miss the entire 2018 season. Best wishes to Tyson on his recovery!

I was sure you were about to say scherenberg :/

Bad luck to goldsack, wasnt he playing forward though?

Money bags is their utility - they play him all over the ground really

Still basically opens a spot in the 22 for Murray, Mihocek and Stepho.

[quinny88]

That's bad luck for Goldsack. May not get back from that as someone that's about to turn 31

[Sabretooth Tigers]

 :-[

If Danger is unlikely  for 2 or more weeks I'd be tempted to leave him out for a further 2 plus  to play in to top form plus see if his price dropped. Let's say for arguments sake the above encompassed 5 to 6 weeks. What if I were to replace him with a reasonably low to mid- pricer that I was confident of raising quite substantially in price in said period. The idea being Danger's price drops, replacement players price rises, replacement player must be capable of scoring well, 100 at least, and I keep the price difference so that Danger can be restored at any time. Thinking of players such as Coniglio, Rockliff, Redden etc. Already have Coniglio and JOM but can't settle on a player. Really need a score-burst type who will clean up early but won't have much chance of being a keeper or someone like Rocky that has a sheissen hausen bye. Looking to make $100,000 plus to substantiate a Danger trade. Not keen on carrying him for a week or so then have him come in off injury and end up watching his price drop, also weary of the Ablett factor. Does any of the above make sense or am I speaking out of my darkest personal orifice. Cheers guys. PLEASE suggest as many players you think could fill the above requirement. Plus any thoughts you have for or against. I like this method because it enables Danger in to my side at any given time, no struggle to trade for money to get him in, and if he doesn't reach his normal lofty peaks or is effected by Gazza's inclusion I save a trade.

;)

[SilverLion]

:-[

If Danger is unlikely  for 2 or more weeks I'd be tempted to leave him out for a further 2 plus  to play in to top form plus see if his price dropped. Let's say for arguments sake the above encompassed 5 to 6 weeks. What if I were to replace him with a reasonably low to mid- pricer that I was confident of raising quite substantially in price in said period. The idea being Danger's price drops, replacement players price rises, replacement player must be capable of scoring well, 100 at least, and I keep the price difference so that Danger can be restored at any time. Thinking of players such as Coniglio, Rockliff, Redden etc. Already have Coniglio and JOM but can't settle on a player. Really need a score-burst type who will clean up early but won't have much chance of being a keeper or someone like Rocky that has a sheissen hausen bye. Looking to make $100,000 plus to substantiate a Danger trade. Not keen on carrying him for a week or so then have him come in off injury and end up watching his price drop, also weary of the Ablett factor. Does any of the above make sense or am I speaking out of my darkest personal orifice. Cheers guys. PLEASE suggest as many players you think could fill the above requirement.

;)

;)

Libba, Armitage and Parker are some that come to mind.

[Ringo]

:-[

If Danger is unlikely  for 2 or more weeks I'd be tempted to leave him out for a further 2 plus  to play in to top form plus see if his price dropped. Let's say for arguments sake the above encompassed 5 to 6 weeks. What if I were to replace him with a reasonably low to mid- pricer that I was confident of raising quite substantially in price in said period. The idea being Danger's price drops, replacement players price rises, replacement player must be capable of scoring well, 100 at least, and I keep the price difference so that Danger can be restored at any time. Thinking of players such as Coniglio, Rockliff, Redden etc. Already have Coniglio and JOM but can't settle on a player. Really need a score-burst type who will clean up early but won't have much chance of being a keeper or someone like Rocky that has a sheissen hausen bye. Looking to make $100,000 plus to substantiate a Danger trade. Not keen on carrying him for a week or so then have him come in off injury and end up watching his price drop, also weary of the Ablett factor. Does any of the above make sense or am I speaking out of my darkest personal orifice. Cheers guys. PLEASE suggest as many players you think could fill the above requirement.

;)

;)

Libba, Armitage and Parker are some that come to mind.

This is a head one to answer. Danger is $750k and even if he averages 110 over 4 weeks will drop only about $100k.  So you would still need to find about $100k to trade back in.
I am toying with 3 ideas at the moment for Danger as $750k is too much to sit on bench,
One is to start Selwood or Duncan and upgrade to Danger when he bottoms out as a straight trade.
Second is to start Dusty (I was only starting Danger and Titch) as he 99% will be in final team and working to upgrade others to Danger.
Third is one you alluded to but cooling is start Rocky and upgrade prior to Rd 10.

[shaker]

:-[

If Danger is unlikely  for 2 or more weeks I'd be tempted to leave him out for a further 2 plus  to play in to top form plus see if his price dropped. Let's say for arguments sake the above encompassed 5 to 6 weeks. What if I were to replace him with a reasonably low to mid- pricer that I was confident of raising quite substantially in price in said period. The idea being Danger's price drops, replacement players price rises, replacement player must be capable of scoring well, 100 at least, and I keep the price difference so that Danger can be restored at any time. Thinking of players such as Coniglio, Rockliff, Redden etc. Already have Coniglio and JOM but can't settle on a player. Really need a score-burst type who will clean up early but won't have much chance of being a keeper or someone like Rocky that has a sheissen hausen bye. Looking to make $100,000 plus to substantiate a Danger trade. Not keen on carrying him for a week or so then have him come in off injury and end up watching his price drop, also weary of the Ablett factor. Does any of the above make sense or am I speaking out of my darkest personal orifice. Cheers guys. PLEASE suggest as many players you think could fill the above requirement.

;)

;)

Libba, Armitage and Parker are some that come to mind.

This is a head one to answer. Danger is $750k and even if he averages 110 over 4 weeks will drop only about $100k.  So you would still need to find about $100k to trade back in.
I am toying with 3 ideas at the moment for Danger as $750k is too much to sit on bench,
One is to start Selwood or Duncan and upgrade to Danger when he bottoms out as a straight trade.
Second is to start Dusty (I was only starting Danger and Titch) as he 99% will be in final team and working to upgrade others to Danger.
Third is one you alluded to but cooling is start Rocky and upgrade prior to Rd 10.

If he does not start R1 750K is to much for the bench so I will pick a gun mid with a lower B/E Cripps if he is not named R1 or Parker if he is a late out but the extra cash needs to sit in bank so Danger can be brought back in with one trade

[_wato]

Hanley out 4-6 with dislocated shoulder

Read on twitter

[Bully]

Hanley out 4-6 with dislocated shoulder

Read on twitter

Diving into fences in a JLT game is dumb in the extreme.

[Huttabito]

Hanley out 4-6 with dislocated shoulder

Read on twitter

Diving into fences in a JLT game is dumb in the extreme.

He never made it to the fence, just landed awkwardly sliding to stop a goal.

Picked him up in draft last night at D2... Really didn't think it was going to be that bad...