WXV Rules Discussion 2017

[GoLions]

New idea for the 'price' of each player in the cap:

Whatever their average is, double it.

Take that new value, and multiply it by 5.

Now, divide that by their original average.

Finally, subtract 10 from this new value.

That is the new price of the player in question. Use this for all players, and then work out the new average, min, and max caps.

Ez.

Had to make a slight adjustment in case they don't play a game and thus avg is 0

https://jumpshare.com/v/rvdT4bZcwq4GOErHiVAQ

Column G fellas and fedettes

[GoLions]

That's how it's done btw Holz

[Holz]

That's how it's done btw Holz

I kinda think Danger should cost more then Aaron Black

[Purple 77]

Hahaha, I thought it was supposed to be zero or one each when I first glanced it, but thought otherwise when you wanted data :P

[Purple 77]

Kinda crazy I have 10 votes already.

Someone do another one so I can release a couple of results :P

[GoLions]

Kinda crazy I have 10 votes already.

Someone do another one so I can release a couple of results :P

I said I would when you send out another vote with my cap suggestion :P

[meow meow]

Holz can you show me how much Griffen will cost under all the caps?

[Holz]

Holz can you show me how much Griffen will cost under all the caps?

under Ossie Cap its 89
Under Holz Cap its a raw number of 85 then down to 80 because he will be 32 next year.

So essentially 89 under Ossie v 80 under Holz

considering he came out 52 77 then injured im happy my formula came out with an average 9 points under.

under both systems he would get the injury discount though.

[meow meow]

How the fluff will I be able to get over the cap if discounted Griff, Wells, Sandi and Waite cost flower all, and Dempster, Mitchell, Murphy, Petrie, Montagna and McVeigh retire? I'll be 8 million under.

[GoLions]

Holz can you show me how much Griffen will cost under all the caps?

under Ossie Cap its 89
Under Holz Cap its a raw number of 85 then down to 80 because he will be 32 next year.

So essentially 89 under Ossie v 80 under Holz

considering he came out 52 77 then injured im happy my formula came out with an average 9 points under.

under both systems he would get the injury discount though.

What about under Rico's?

[Holz]

How the fluff will I be able to get over the cap if discounted Griff, Wells, Sandi and Waite cost flower all, and Dempster, Mitchell, Murphy, Petrie, Montagna and McVeigh retire? I'll be 8 million under.

They dont cost nothing they cost closer to their true value.

its not hard at getting over the cap at all.

The minimum cap will likely fall and you will be over it regardless.

You will have guys who rise in cap too. Blakely is 80 in Ossie Cap but 89 in my cap so basically Griffen and Blakely balance each other out perfectly.

which proves the system is good

Ossie:
Blakely 80
Griffen 89

Holz
Blakely 89
Griffen 80

Blakely is >>>> Griffen.

[meow meow]

And that's why I voted for your cap.

[Holz]

And that's why I voted for your cap.

well thank you, most players arent really affected and basically all teams will have guys who go up and go down.

like Griffen Blakely

M.Crouch R.Gray etc..

[Ricochet]

And that's why I voted for your cap.

[Purple 77]

So with

Berlin
Pacific
PNL
Rio
Tokyo

to vote, we can say these votes have been decided:

1. Different cosmetic WXV score multiplier
Currently, WXV totals are divided by 10 to present an AFL-like scoreline.
A) Keep as is, don't really care
B) Divide by 15 instead, to make scores lower and more 'AFL-like'

With 12 votes to 1, A wins



7. Submitting a list lodgement where you are below the minimum cap (and started over it)
Penalties
A) Loss of 4 premiership points (will not benefit their future draft pick, i.e. if you finish 16th coz of penalty, but earned 14th, then you would get pick 5 and not pick 3) in the next year
B) Loss of first round draft pick in the next year
C) Both A & C

Although termination was floated as a valid option, I feel like it's kinda overkill, at least to begin with.

But with 10 votes to 1 & 2, C wins.



9. Trading Cap Space
A) Allow, will add strategy to the game (cap space will reset to normal in the following year)
B) Don't allow

With 12 votes to 1, B wins.