Round 11 progressive scores

[batt]

1459/14 if my maths makes sense.
Sandi, Treloar, Howe, Adams.

[enzedder]

1338/14 Treloar, Fyfe, Sandi, Pendles to go.
Looking at 1750-1800 and will take that with only 18 players this week.
Heaps of low scores have been disappointing to say the least.
Perryman 43, Myers 46, McGrath 55, Parsons 56, Laird 59, Higgins 62.
Glad I didn't bring in Bolton 44 for the sake of having a 19th player...as with Perryman I would've only got an extra point.

[Capper]

Sandi can eat a dick, only have 18 playing now and must take Otten's score

[_wato]

Sandi out, copping Otten's 36.

1165/12

Adams Pendles Treloar Fyfe Howe Ryan to go.

Need 1800 to be competitive and hopefully hold rank.

[King_Robbo]

1895 - Sandi out meant I copped Myers score but judging by most scores around the grounds it'll be enough be in the top few % this week and hopefully another rankings jump

[AaronKirk]

1829 for me.

Given I copped rubbish from Parsons, Scharenberg and Bolton and Myers in that score have to be pretty happy with that.

[batt]

1840.  Had 21 playing before Sandi out.  I think that was the difference.  Numbers mean everything when rookies are scoring so poorly.

Happy to be going back up after a month falling every week from 28th to 600ish.

[_wato]

1751 :(

Otten 36, Ryan 37, Parsons 56, Laird 59, Higgins 62 combining for 250 lol

[RaisyDaisy]

Can't catch a break at the moment

Started with 20 players and then Sandi went out and of course I pretty much have every pathetic rookie score possible

1741, no thanks to Laird 59, EVW 51, Parsons 56, Myers and Shaz 46 all being in my 18

Won my cash league so not all is bad, but overall I'll be going backwards again

[RaisyDaisy]

One guy in my cash league has a midfield of Danger, Jelwood, Dusty, Ablett, Kelly, Pendles, Treloar and Fyfe

Must be flowering nice. Just short of 2k he hit

[shaker]

1938 with a big thanks to Danger Selwood Kelly and Martin  :)

[enzedder]

1776 which looks about average to good across my leagues.
Happy with that considering I only had 18.
Should fare better in the next two bye rounds.

[BomberSam]

1740 for me. Looks pretty crap in here but it should be just good enough in the overall scheme of things.

[djbics]

1823 so probably around or just under par.  Best I've seen so far is a 2009

[Samsturmfels]

1776 which looks about average to good across my leagues.
Happy with that considering I only had 18.
Should fare better in the next two bye rounds.

Same score