Round 11 captain?

[crowls]

Taking this thread down another path.    What score is a pass mark during byes.   
year -  bye 1, bye 2, bye 3
2014 - 1809, 1865, 1531 
2015 - 1914, 1623, 1781
2016 - 1987, 1778, 1783


Was thinking 1750 is par, 1850 above average and will move you up in the rankings.

[LordSneeze]

Taking this thread down another path.    What score is a pass mark during byes.   
year -  bye 1, bye 2, bye 3
2014 - 1809, 1865, 1531 
2015 - 1914, 1623, 1781
2016 - 1987, 1778, 1783


Was thinking 1750 is par, 1850 above average and will move you up in the rankings.

This is a difficult question as this year doesn't have as many strong rookies which means it is likely people will be having to have 30-40s on field if not running with a few extra over the min 18 players.

Bye 1
I can see a lot of people scoring 1400, but I can also see others likely to go 1850+ given the large variance in the amount of players people have out. Most posters are ones who have planned well, but looking through leagues and I think that it is more likely most will have 16-19 with only 10-12 prems.

Bye 2
No one should have issues here and should be playing with 16-18 prems on field. I would expect 1900s

Bye 3
AFter bringing in Players from Bye 1 & 2 most should be fine to cover this by. Expect 15-16 prems on field and scores around the 1800 mark.

With that all said though, it is really dependant on how the rookies score & if many people go huge. If many are running with donuts or spud rookies scores the par scores will fall drastically.

[tommy10]

Sloane or Danger  :o

Surely Danger at home  :o

[GCSkiwi]

I'm a big fan of Titchfield normally but this round with Pendles against Freo, I agree that Danger into Pendles is far too tempting to pass up. As for what score I'll take, I don't see it being any different to usual, 120+ you take. Being greedy has burnt me more than it's ever worked out.

[crowls]

I'm a big fan of Titchfield normally but this round with Pendles against Freo, I agree that Danger into Pendles is far too tempting to pass up. As for what score I'll take, I don't see it being any different to usual, 120+ you take. Being greedy has burnt me more than it's ever worked out.

spot on,  have had sub 70 Captain scores chasing 5-10 extra points.

[GCSkiwi]

Yeeeeeah after saying that I totally forgot that it was a thursday game and still had Titch locked in as VC... showere. Now I have to decide between Danger or Pendles  :-[

[petefisker]

Yeeeeeah after saying that I totally forgot that it was a thursday game and still had Titch locked in as VC... showere. Now I have to decide between Danger or Pendles  :-[

Same.. left the VC on titch from mid week..
Will have to go Danger on his averages.

[Thewizz71]

Glad I took the earlier advice - Dangerbury for me.

[LordSneeze]

Mitchell had 70 in the first half, but then dropped off in the second.

[tkringle]

have not seen a captains thread for this round.

Is that because its a Danger into Pendles no-brainer type of weekend? anyone thinking that after two massive scores, Danger may through up a 100-110?

[Gigantor]

http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,109696.0.html

This is probably the unofficial thread, would be nice if people followed some basic thread naming conventions  ???

[tkringle]

Missed that thread, thanks Gigantor,

[Bluesalltheway]

have not seen a captains thread for this round.

Is that because its a Danger into Pendles no-brainer type of weekend? anyone thinking that after two massive scores, Danger may through up a 100-110?

Even if you do think he might go 100-110 it's not worth the risk going against him, because he could easily pull out another 150 and you'll be way behind everyone else

[GoLions]

Wouldn't mind Danger scoring 50 with my mate having him C after Tmitch didn't kill it as VC.

Then Pendles 150 on Sunday ;D

[Bully]

Wouldn't mind Danger scoring 50 with my mate having him C after Tmitch didn't kill it as VC.

Then Pendles 150 on Sunday ;D

Ditto