Round 10 Richmond vs Essendon - Dreamtime at the 'G - Saturday May 27 7:25 - MCG

[LaHug]

Note that the 2 Richmond supporters who commented here believe it was a horrible decision and the 2 neutral posts thought it was the right decision.

For what it's worth, my Essendon friend at the game thought it was bullshower and my friends on Facebook also agree (so far).

But you're right that we've only got our goal kicking to blame for not being ahead.

[Mat0369]

I think the Mills one is the precedent. I thought Green was close enough but you can see he had other options. I probably wouldn't have called it.

[Jukes]

Kicking in danger can join dropping the ball and high fend off in the rules that don't affect Dusty

[LaHug]

Kicking in danger can join dropping the ball and high fend off in the rules that don't affect Dusty

Nobody gets called for in danger or dropping these days. I hate it. I'd rather Dusty get called once to set a precedent.

[Bill Manspeaker]

raining in Sunbury so I dunno if this is going the G's way or not. might see some rain

[LaHug]

Classic non deliberate call by the umps
Would've been called against us 10/10 times

[LaHug]

Is man in front not a thing anymore??

[Torpedo10]

Is man in front not a thing anymore??

Are you missing the fact Daniher touched it first?  :P

[Torpedo10]

Game changin decision there.

[LaHug]

Nank! Finally! Thank flower!

[LaHug]

Dusty 3, Ellis 2, Zaka 1

[Mat0369]

Nank! Finally! Thank flower!

I would have been happier if he stayed on 50 odd  :P

[Toga]

What an ugly game of football

[AaronKirk]

Dusty 3, Ellis 2, Zaka 1

Zaka butchered the ball. Goddard and Heppell both had better games.

My votes would be Dusty 3, Cotchin 2, Ellis 1.

Richmond should have won by 10+ goals. However the non high free kick to Stewart was the worst decision all night.

[Toga]

Richmond should have won by 10+ goals. However the non high free kick to Stewart was the worst decision all night.

Lol, would be competing with a list of about 20 rubbish decisions.