Mid-Season Poll Thread - Trade Period - AXVII SC Coaches only please

[Jukes]

So the first of our polls - a mid-season trading period, to be run over the multi-bye rounds (11, 12, 13). Teams can make as many trades as they want of players and picks, but with two limitations:
1) all trades must be equal in amounts of players/picks traded - 1 for 1, 2 for 2, 3 for 3, etc.
2) all teams must come out of the trade period with a first round selection (to avoid teams chucking it all in for the 2017 flag).

Basic yes or no answer will suffice!

[fanTCfool]

Isn't there an issue that non-Americas SC coaches can vote in this poll? Or is that the idea?

[Jukes]

Isn't there an issue that non-Americas SC coaches can vote in this poll? Or is that the idea?

I'm fairly certain nobody would be petty/stupid enough to come in and interrupt our polls aha

[SydneyRox]

so full picks and players..... hmm sounds interesting.... think it could be worth while

[nas]

so full picks and players..... hmm sounds interesting.... think it could be worth while

Yep, agree.

[Nige]

Sorry, but I'm not a fan. It's not that realistic in the alignment to actual AFL. I also think it's too easily abused in a variety of different ways, especially with the varying activity levels of coaches in this comp.

[kilbluff1985]

Sorry, but I'm not a fan. It's not that realistic in the alignment to actual AFL. I also think it's too easily abused in a variety of different ways, especially with the varying activity levels of coaches in this comp.

kind of why i like this comp not afraid to do things differently if it sounds better

[powersuperkents]

Isn't there an issue that non-Americas SC coaches can vote in this poll? Or is that the idea?

hahaha we will know if the amount of votes exceeds the number of coaches

[fanTCfool]

Isn't there an issue that non-Americas SC coaches can vote in this poll? Or is that the idea?

hahaha we will know if the amount of votes exceeds the number of coaches

But who's voted? Just because you have the right number of votes doesn't mean it is the right people.

[powersuperkents]

Isn't there an issue that non-Americas SC coaches can vote in this poll? Or is that the idea?

hahaha we will know if the amount of votes exceeds the number of coaches

But who's voted? Just because you have the right number of votes doesn't mean it is the right people.

First come, first served hahaha  :P

haha I'm sure that if a coach didn't vote and there were 12 votes they would raise the issue - I agree though, we should at least comment after voting

[nas]

Isn't there an issue that non-Americas SC coaches can vote in this poll? Or is that the idea?

hahaha we will know if the amount of votes exceeds the number of coaches

But who's voted? Just because you have the right number of votes doesn't mean it is the right people.

First come, first served hahaha  :P

haha I'm sure that if a coach didn't vote and there were 12 votes they would raise the issue - I agree though, we should at least comment after voting

Voted in both