OUT: Beams IN: Bont or Pendles?

Started by tor01doc, May 05, 2017, 01:11:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

tor01doc

Which of these guys do the Fanfooty hot polloi prefer?

    Am leading towards The Bont as his bye is better structurally for me

Edit: Am leaning towards Pendles as his bye is better structurally for me


(My how things change quickly)

Rusty00

I've gone Pendles. Can't really give you a specific reason why as I haven't really thought about. Probably because I was so annoyed at myself for not having Pendles to start the year >:(

shaker

I've gone Bont purely because I cant get anymore RD. 13 players in without causing a problem

batt

Whoever fits ya bye better.  Both good value.  Both have high enough BEs to bring in next week if you prefer.

MC

I'll be trading Broomhead and Beams to Bont and Black/Parsons at this stage. Avoiding a donut and praying my pre-season decision to start Treloar over Pendles starts paying dividends! 

batt

Quote from: MC on May 05, 2017, 01:31:35 PM
I'll be trading Broomhead and Beams to Bont and Black/Parsons at this stage. Avoiding a donut and praying my pre-season decision to start Treloar over Pendles starts paying dividends!
Note to 2018-self:  Sometimes picking a player can box you out of a super-premo due to byes.

I started Mitchell, Fyfe & Treloar and am way too scared of the bye to bring in Pendles too.

_wato

#6
Pendleberry. My question is, is it too much to have all of Adams, Pendlebury, Treloar and Howe?

crowls

Quote from: batt on May 05, 2017, 01:33:31 PM
Quote from: MC on May 05, 2017, 01:31:35 PM
I'll be trading Broomhead and Beams to Bont and Black/Parsons at this stage. Avoiding a donut and praying my pre-season decision to start Treloar over Pendles starts paying dividends!
Note to 2018-self:  Sometimes picking a player can box you out of a super-premo due to byes.

I started Mitchell, Fyfe & Treloar and am way too scared of the bye to bring in Pendles too.
Alternatively 4 rounds from now,  Having pendles will enable you to deal with the relevant recalcitrant player as necessary.   

tor01doc

Quote from: _wato on May 05, 2017, 01:56:06 PM
Pendleberry. My question is, is it too much to have all of Adams, Pendlebury, Treloar and Howe?

If you also have quite a few of Grundy, Laird, Sloane, Shaw, Mummy, Greene, Fyfe, Sandi, Neale, Titch, Heppell etc then would be a worry, otherwise nah

batt

Quote from: crowls on May 05, 2017, 02:00:56 PM
Quote from: batt on May 05, 2017, 01:33:31 PM
Quote from: MC on May 05, 2017, 01:31:35 PM
I'll be trading Broomhead and Beams to Bont and Black/Parsons at this stage. Avoiding a donut and praying my pre-season decision to start Treloar over Pendles starts paying dividends!
Note to 2018-self:  Sometimes picking a player can box you out of a super-premo due to byes.

I started Mitchell, Fyfe & Treloar and am way too scared of the bye to bring in Pendles too.
Alternatively 4 rounds from now,  Having pendles will enable you to deal with the relevant recalcitrant player as necessary.
Ooooh yes, this I hadn't really thought about.

There is a chance Treloar picks it up and you've already planned to trade him out in R13.  Tricky one.  Think I'll just get by without Pendles for now :)

jvalles69

Think you'll want both by seasons end so whichever suits your bye structure.

tor01doc

Quote from: jvalles69 on May 05, 2017, 04:12:16 PM
Think you'll want both by seasons end so whichever suits your bye structure.

Thank you

So Pendles now

Bont or Sloane 'ron

PowerBug

I'm doing Beams to Pendles because I already own Bont :P

But get Bont if you don't have Bont
Leader of the King Karl Amon fan club
Coach of WXV side Rio De Janeiro Jaguars
2023 SC: Rank 126

quinny88

Would of said Pendles every day of the week but Bont is too hard to ignore now. Gets 40 points for 3 possession quarters