Fyfe Rumours

[valkorum]

Our favourite reporter Kim HACKdorn has put this article to print today - but NO ONE ELSE has confirmed his story, including the Freo football club

http://www.watoday.com.au/afl/fremantle-dockers/fremantle-champion-nat-fyfe-ends-speculation-and-signs-new-dockers-deal-20170713-gxb2p6.html

[Gigantor]

Our favourite reporter Kim HACKdorn has put this article to print today - but NO ONE ELSE has confirmed his story, including the Freo football club

http://www.watoday.com.au/afl/fremantle-dockers/fremantle-champion-nat-fyfe-ends-speculation-and-signs-new-dockers-deal-20170713-gxb2p6.html

Didn't he win an award for breaking the Sam Mitchell to West Coast story?

[valkorum]

Didn't he win an award for breaking the Sam Mitchell to West Coast story?

No idea, but he generally has no clue when it comes to Fremantle.  He is plugged in to WC. 

[Vinny]

Oh so it wasn't legit.  :o

Fremantle board member Peter Bell has denied reports superstar Nat Fyfe has signed a new contract with the club.

But Bell remains confident the 25-year-old club captain will recommit to the Dockers in the near future.
Fairfax Media reported yesterday Fyfe had inked a new deal worth about $1.4million a season for three or four years.

“I read that with interest on Friday,” Bell said on Fox Sports’ Gameday Live this morning.
“Obviously, negotiations are ongoing.
“I’ve always been confident … that Nat Fyfe will be re-signing with Fremantle.
“But until his signature is on the dotted line, I’ll be a little bit nervous.
“But again, (I’m) confident.

“He hasn’t signed as yet, but hopefully it can happen before the end of the season and we can put that to bed.”
An official announcement on a new deal to keep the 2015 Brownlow medalist at the port is seemingly just a matter of time.

[valkorum]

Here is the article that Vinny posted from

https://thewest.com.au/sport/fremantle-dockers/peter-bell-denies-new-nat-fyfe-contract-ng-b88538023z

[Purple 77]

I don't know how it's acceptable for that journo who reported it (or any journo) to be free from being held accountable for what they publish.

They should get suspended IMO

[valkorum]

I don't know how it's acceptable for that journo who reported it (or any journo) to be free from being held accountable for what they publish.

They should get suspended IMO

He wont be suspended, but he has no credibility when it comes to Fremantle articles.  Why do you think I call him Kim HACKdorn (Hagdorn)